What an original idea!

And in any case, an unarmed human (unless it's Arnold Schwarzenegger) isn't very dangerous compared to a lot of other animals.

I'll bet Jet Li, Mark Wahlberg and possibly Wesley snipes could survive it.
And the idea isn't too original. Last year in school I had a class assignment where we had to invent a relaity tv show and market it. My group came up with this idea. And some of the ideas we played around with were if instead of a president being voted into office, he had to fight his way into office via combating some of the world's mostd angerous predators and earnignt he right to office that way.
Some genuis made a mini video of Bush in action and he didn't survive. He lost his life to a meerkat and a rather hostile baboon

Hey Raine, I'm just wondering, have you got any volunteers for the role of human?;)

I was being sarcastic. There's already a movie about that featuring Arnold.

Was that the one called Running Man, where they stuck him in some rather disgusting looking lycra?

Indeed.

Arnie is harmless when given a good tickle!

How would Mark Wahlberg survive it? He'd bust some crunches, pull-ups, ****ty raps and every ****tier acting and the animals would run away?

Running Man pit Arnolrd against other beastly men not other animals.

Mark Wahlberg has a shot of surviving. Given the right incentive he could do it.
And you forgot to make reference to Mark's modeling career. Worse comes to worse he might be able to . . . resort to beastiality.
Although I doubt a siberian tiger will find him as attractive as I would. :laughing:

allright... I am a hunter and really enjoy hunting. I am very very against fox hunting or any other cruel form of hunting. I know a lot of you are one way or the other but there is a middle ground where many hunters stay. I believe, like most responsible hunters, that the object in hunting is to take down an animal as fast and as humanely as possible. Sure that may sound dumb to people because the animal is still being killed but it is better than fox hunting. I've been on several hunting trips where we will pass on deer if we can't get a clean shot. I would never shoot or kill an animal if it would cause the animal to suffer. Yes i know... i am still killing an animal even if it doesn't suffer. But I love meat, especially deer meat! Its much more tender and flavorful in my opinion. To me I'd rather eat something that I killed as humanely as possible rather than eating some processed piece of meat where a cow was electrified and was slit by the throat to bleed to death. Yes I know that some of you don't agree with killing animals period. But try and understand that many hunters like me do it for other resons than you may think. We like meat and we will eat meat regardless if you think its terribly wrong. So... would you rather us kill a deer with one swift shot making the death of the animal as painless and instant as possible, or would you rather us eat cows that are brutally slaughtered? I know you don't agree with either but please tell me that you would pick responsible hunting over a sluaghter house. And I do think that the methods of fox hunting are wrong.

hmm.

To my knowledge cows aren't elctrified inside slaughter houses. Just killed, and then hung up so someone can cut down the parts. It's the calves that have it bad. They're tortured so their body can be just the right kind of tender.
But I don't eat beef so that's one less person after a cow. :)

And I like your style. Killing what is absolutely necessary for you to survive and not hunting for sport. Muy bueno.