| DontRunMeOver |
02-08-2007 05:30 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by ArtistInTheAmbulance
(Post 333868)
ive a question.
is it the person behind the camera or the camera itself which makes the biggest difference?
|
It depends on what level you're talking about. Most nonces can take the occasional really great photograph if they are using a really good camera. They'll also have a load of crappy photographs with very nice resolution. A brilliant photographer using a rubbish camera will be limited to taking a load of very good, but never great, photographs. Give them a middle-of the range SLR though and a good photographer should be able to pull some magic.
I'd argue that you can't actually become a good photographer (by my definition of good) unless you've got a good camera with the necessary lenses and lighting equipment anyway. Getting the angles and composition right for the photo is only part of the job, focussing and lighting are just as important and a lot of the skill comes from being able to adjust all of that properly.
|