Sex Offender in MY Neighbourhood (quote, Inci, hands) - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > Community Center > The Lounge
Register Blogging Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-03-2007, 01:47 AM   #41 (permalink)
#1 Schuldinist.
 
Voice_of_the_Soul12,13,01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 420
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crowquill View Post
Its nice to know you have the same sense of decency as most murderers and rapists.
Well, it's not like I'd do this to someone who didn't deserve it. That's what separates me from them; while they hurt others to satisfy themselves, I would hurt them to achieve a universal balance. Karmic justice.

Should we have spared people like Hitler, Mussolini, or Saddam just to uphold some moral standard? Or what about some people who weren't as significant as these dictators, like Tsutomu Miyazaki (The otaku killer), Seung-Hui Cho, or Nathan Gale? Should all of them been spared for the sake of being "civilized?"
__________________
I don't mean to dwell
But I can't help myself
When I feel the vibe
And taste a memory
Of a time in life
When years seemed to stand still
Voice_of_the_Soul12,13,01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2007, 01:52 AM   #42 (permalink)
isfckingdead
 
sleepy jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 18,967
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Voice_of_the_Soul12,13,01 View Post
Well, it's not like I'd do this to someone who didn't deserve it. That's what separates me from them; while they hurt others to satisfy themselves, I would hurt them to achieve a universal balance. Karmic justice.

Should we have spared people like Hitler, Mussolini, or Saddam just to uphold some moral standard? Or what about some people who weren't as significant as these dictators, like Tsutomu Miyazaki (The otaku killer), Seung-Hui Cho, or Nathan Gale? Should all of them been spared for the sake of being "civilized?"
You're making it sound like I propose we tell them that was bad and then let them go back into society, thats not what i'm saying at all. Karmic justice is bullshit, actual justice is better.

Its not justice to cruelly torture someone for their crimes, besides who decides how deserving a crime is? If you steal do we cut your hand off? If you rape do you proceed to cut off your genitals and then leave you to be publically stoned? Or leave you to the dogs? Is it going to be you to decide who deserves what punishment? That sounds like a fantastic form a goverment.

I would have added more, but I feel like talking to my girlfriend so i'm going to split.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by METALLICA89 View Post
Ive seen you on muiltipul forums saying Metallica and slayer are the worst **** you kid go suck your **** while you listen to your ****ing emo **** I bet you do listen to emo music
sleepy jack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2007, 02:10 AM   #43 (permalink)
lift ya skirt
 
dirt mcgirt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: brooklyn zoo, what?
Posts: 194
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Voice_of_the_Soul12,13,01 View Post
I would hurt them to achieve a universal balance. Karmic justice
**** son, its like you a fascist an a hippie an the same time.

good luck wif dat.
dirt mcgirt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2007, 06:26 AM   #44 (permalink)
They call me Tundra Boy
 
DontRunMeOver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: In your linen cupboard.
Posts: 1,166
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Voice_of_the_Soul12,13,01 View Post
Should we have spared people like Hitler, Mussolini, or Saddam just to uphold some moral standard? Or what about some people who weren't as significant as these dictators, like Tsutomu Miyazaki (The otaku killer), Seung-Hui Cho, or Nathan Gale? Should all of them been spared for the sake of being "civilized?"
But why would you want these people killed unless they have done anything directly to you? And if you did really want them killed then why didn't you go and kill them yourself?

And can somebody please explain to me what Mussolini actually did that was so evil, because I'm yet to hear a proper explanation. Yes he fought on the same side as Hitler, but the US and UK fought on the same side as Stalin who was possible worse.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katyppfan View Post
When Pete plays it is 100% live , your music if that's what you call it doesn't sound so good either? so you can't really critercize can you ?
DontRunMeOver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2007, 12:06 PM   #45 (permalink)
#1 Schuldinist.
 
Voice_of_the_Soul12,13,01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 420
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crowquill View Post
You're making it sound like I propose we tell them that was bad and then let them go back into society, thats not what i'm saying at all. Karmic justice is bullshit, actual justice is better.

Its not justice to cruelly torture someone for their crimes, besides who decides how deserving a crime is? If you steal do we cut your hand off? If you rape do you proceed to cut off your genitals and then leave you to be publically stoned? Or leave you to the dogs? Is it going to be you to decide who deserves what punishment? That sounds like a fantastic form a goverment.

I would have added more, but I feel like talking to my girlfriend so i'm going to split.
I never said it should be me who decides these things. This is what I believe. If I WERE in a position of power and was allowed to pass a sentence on these people, you better believe I'd send them to the same hell they caused.

You and me have two different ideas of what justice is. I think of it as an eye for an eye.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dirt mcgirt View Post
**** son, its like you a fascist an a hippie an the same time.

good luck wif dat.
I dunno how to respond to this bastardized use of the English language, but I'll try.

...... nope, I can't.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DontRunMeOver View Post
But why would you want these people killed unless they have done anything directly to you? And if you did really want them killed then why didn't you go and kill them yourself?
You're right. Maybe I should be the one to have killed these people. I should have just got in my truck and drove all the way from Missouri to Virginia Tech and confronted the killer. Granted, I have no weapon nor the liscense to have one, and have no experience with guns, but HEY! I play mother****ing GTA, bitch, I can bust a cap wit da best of them!

I'm not in a position of power to decide what should happen to them. That's why.



I'd rather have a fascist judicial system that doesn't give rapist a chance to taste life again than a democracy where a lawyer can find some little loophole to exploit to keep a rapist from serving a few years in prison. And I'm pretty sure the victims of said rapists would want the same thing.
__________________
I don't mean to dwell
But I can't help myself
When I feel the vibe
And taste a memory
Of a time in life
When years seemed to stand still
Voice_of_the_Soul12,13,01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2007, 12:10 PM   #46 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Methville
Posts: 2,116
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Voice_of_the_Soul12,13,01 View Post
Should we have spared people like Hitler, Mussolini, or Saddam just to uphold some moral standard? Or what about some people who weren't as significant as these dictators, like Tsutomu Miyazaki (The otaku killer), Seung-Hui Cho, or Nathan Gale? Should all of them been spared for the sake of being "civilized?"
The problem I have with this post is that all of those people were immediate threats and therefore treated as so. The reason Nathan Gale was shot was for immediate safety. Had the circumstances been different he would have been apprehended in a less violent fashion and probably be faced with time in prison and possibly a correctional facility. Same goes for pretty much everyone you listed. Had we managed to catch Hitler in a safe and timely manner he would've had a fair trial to determine his penalty. Thats how the system works.
The Unfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2007, 12:15 PM   #47 (permalink)
down the rabbit hole
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: the mountain called monkey
Posts: 764
Default

this thread is nuts.

i agree you cant fight hate with hate...

however this is a circular argument that really is based on your morals.
joyboyo53 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2007, 12:22 PM   #48 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Methville
Posts: 2,116
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jgd85 View Post
however this is a circular argument that really is based on your morals.
It does not matter what is morally appropriate, rather what is functionally correct.
The Unfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2007, 02:13 PM   #49 (permalink)
Dr. Prunk
 
boo boo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Where the buffalo roam.
Posts: 12,137
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crowquill View Post
You call that true justice? Thats just barbarism.
And I guess rape is just natural selection.

If you're attractive and vulnerable, you had it coming, right?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crowquill View Post
Its not justice to cruelly torture someone for their crimes, besides who decides how deserving a crime is? If you steal do we cut your hand off? If you rape do you proceed to cut off your genitals and then leave you to be publically stoned? Or leave you to the dogs? Is it going to be you to decide who deserves what punishment? That sounds like a fantastic form a goverment.
Its the same kinda goverment Iraq had under Saddam Hussein. You know, the guy who we shouldn't have done anything about because Iraq was doing just fine?
__________________
It's only knock n' knowall, but I like it

http://www.last.fm/user/kingboobs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Strummer521
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crowquill View Post
I only listen to Santana when I feel like being annoyed.
I only listen to you talk when I want to hear Emo performed acapella.

Last edited by boo boo; 07-03-2007 at 02:39 PM.
boo boo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2007, 02:31 PM   #50 (permalink)
Dr. Prunk
 
boo boo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Where the buffalo roam.
Posts: 12,137
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Unfan View Post
The problem I have with this post is that all of those people were immediate threats and therefore treated as so. The reason Nathan Gale was shot was for immediate safety.
And theres no safety issues when it comes to rapists?

I'm gonna tell you the truth, I'm not a big conservative, especially when it comes to capital punishment. But rapists and child mollestors are the biggest scum of the earth, my position on that is pretty personal. A simple tap on the rist aint gonna cut it.

I dont believe in the death penalty, but I believe in a hard punishment for people who commit the worst of crimes, rape and murder. One problem with America is that we've become way too soft. We think we can rehabilitate people who simply can't be rehabilitated, you can't rehabilitate someone with pedophiliac desires just like you cant rehabilitate someone with homosexual desires or any other sexual preference they have, if its there its there forever. We've given a lot of child rapists a free ride, especially in Vermont.

So yeah, I'm all for Jessicas Law.
__________________
It's only knock n' knowall, but I like it

http://www.last.fm/user/kingboobs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Strummer521
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crowquill View Post
I only listen to Santana when I feel like being annoyed.
I only listen to you talk when I want to hear Emo performed acapella.

Last edited by boo boo; 07-03-2007 at 02:36 PM.
boo boo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.