Tore explained in his above post that the foreskin retracts when you get an erection. So I guess if it goes back a lot, you'll look circumcised.

It can look like that if the skin is "stuck" after being retracted during erection, but I think you should be able to pull the skin over the head when it's flaccid. :\

@ Addidas, yes I'm certain. lol.
Like I said, as a younger kid, it was fully over the head at all times. It just seems as though the skin didn't really grow along with the rest of the penis, so when flacid, the opening stays behind the rim of the head. It's impossible for me to stretch it back over even half way. This is in terms of length of skin. When erect, the skin is stretched to the point where there's no bunching up and it looks cut, except for the under-side where you have the thin strip of skin attached to the bottom part of the head.

Like 333 is saying, it's probably normal but not exactly standard.

You're a freak, freak I tell you! ;)

Personally, I don't see the danger in exposure to pictures of genitalia, but I know other people do so I won't post the pictures here, but .. The wikipedia article on circumcision has some pictures showing non-erect and erect penises, cut and uncut.

Circumcision - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The picture there describes pretty much my own penile situation as far as foreskins go. It covers the head of the penis unless I'm erect, then the foreskin pulls back. While I do remember the glans was much more sensitive when I was a kid, it's still more sensitive than the other parts of the penis, in contrast with what Freebase Dali wrote. To me, it seems reasonable to assume that constant exposure of the head will desensitize it somewhat.

It's also consistent with me and FD's experiences. ;)

From what I'm told of my mates dad who was a hippy in the sixties and got himself circumcised to improve sexual pleasure. Make of it what you will. Asking somebody to rank pleasure sensation out of ten is always a risky business.

Yea, see... mine looks as though it has been circumcised, even though it has not, whether soft or hard.
So, those pictures in the wiki, the top ones are more representative of my foreskin situation, although when flacid, there's a little more of a bulge of extra skin that stays behind the head, but there's nowhere near enough to cover it even half way... so it just remains behind the head.

I'm kind of glad too...
Because uncircumcised penises look more gross than circumcised ones.

Really? I don't agree, but perhaps we could get someone elses opinions. :p:


Could those who like guys say what they prefer - cut or uncut penises? If you need something to look at before you can decide, here are some pictures (hosted on Wikipedia) :

Normal Schlong
Circumcised Schlong

Let's figure this out once and for all!

There needs to be more penises. lol...
Just to average out factors such as oddly shaped ones, etc.

I'm not going on that hunt though.

I agree, but then yeah .. I agree. :p: