The Spam Thread: Channel Your Need to Spam Here Only

[Cuthbert]

Stop making your spam so bloody spammy

[Urban Hat€monger ?]

Originally Posted by alfred

agreed 100%. Also... nice dubs.

Originally Posted by the batlord

dude, who cares? It's one stupid, pointless thread that exists for the sole purpose of being stupid and pointless. It's not like it's really harming anything or clogging the forum. Applying rules to it just for the sake of applying rules to it just seems pedantic and arbitrary.

Originally Posted by ki

i don't know, i just think it's odd to use the same rules for spam in a thread that was made for the sole use of spam. Plus like i said, one person shouldn't be a reason for closing a thread. Also, when vanilla made this thread, it was asked of the mods whether it's a good idea or not, and evidently people thought it was a good idea, so it was left open.

I don't really have any issue with it being closed, but it just seems weird to close it with the basis that you're referring to.

Look it's still open !!!!

[Burning Down]

Originally Posted by Urban Hat€monger ?

Look it's still open !!!!

WOW! NO WAY!!!!

caps

[Bloozcrooz]

Dude wtf? He didn't close the thread so who cares?

[Scarlett O'Hara]

Originally Posted by Bloozcrooz

Dude wtf? He didn't close the thread so who cares?

He did. I reopened it and warned Franco. But he's right, there comes to a point that if someone is spamming maliciously it can warrant a warning/infraction/ban. The repetitive pictures were becoming a bit ridiculous, even for a spam thread.

[Frownland]

Wolves In Sheepskin | Facebook

My band. Spam it, piss on it, just like it first. You'll probably like it.

[Key]

Originally Posted by Vanilla

He did. I reopened it and warned Franco. But he's right, there comes to a point that if someone is spamming maliciously it can warrant a warning/infraction/ban. The repetitive pictures were becoming a bit ridiculous, even for a spam thread.

As I said, one person shouldn't be the reason for closing a thread. An infraction works just as well. And I know that's what you did, I was just referencing my original point.

[Urban Hat€monger ?]

I don't quite know why Franco is getting blamed for it, yes he spammed this thread up with crap and was banned for it but I was closing it for the resulting 20 or 30 pages of crap that followed it after he was banned.

[The Batlord]

Originally Posted by wiggums

You're right, this is a pointless spammy thread, so who cares if someone's posts get deleted?

Because deleting someone's posts in a spam thread is pointless and applies unnecessary restrictions.

Originally Posted by Vanilla

He did. I reopened it and warned Franco. But he's right, there comes to a point that if someone is spamming maliciously it can warrant a warning/infraction/ban. The repetitive pictures were becoming a bit ridiculous, even for a spam thread.

I understand about him spamming for his forum, but why should his pictures matter? It's a spam thread. It's not like he was posting porn and so far as I know, it's not like he was posting twenty posts in a row.

[Franco Pepe Kalle]