:)

Too bad you're not still with LiL. Then I could butt**** her behind your back and then wipe my dick on your mouse pad.

Damn, do you talk to all your first dates with such class?

My first dates are usually non-verbal.

Looks like i'm definitely gonna have to make it to comic con in 2017

https://scontent.fsnc1-1.fna.fbcdn.n...27&oe=58957925

Putting responses here as I felt it might be too off-topic for the computer help thread. Feel free to move it back if you deem necessary.

Yes, although the event itself was awesome, the photo was dogshyt as it was taken with my cell phone. Then again, if I was a professional photographer, I would have an expensive DSLR. But I'm not, so I don't. Although I appreciate your kind words nonetheless.

There is nothing to be stubborn about. There are no hiccups in my process, so you're adding things to a situation that aren't there.

Let's do some examples from my journal:

I took this single-shot photo, and there isn't anything I would change about it. Well, maybe I could've gotten more of the CDs in the shot, but oh well. I think it came out well done. The Walmart Photocenter thought so, too, because they refused to print copies of it because they thought it was taken by a professional. In a twist of irony, the bookshelf that the materials sit on is from Walmart, and the fake plant is from a dollar store.


Took this one, too. The place I used to live in had perfect natural lighting, in the kitchen, no less (the place I'm in now does not). It was taken in my freaking kitchen. I love the fact that the USB robot's head is in the slot, yet his helmet being attached to his arms adds a different perspective. Then you have his legs straight out. Also taken with a cell phone. I think I have a better shot of this as well, but I'm not going to go digging for it right now.

The thing that would improve these is a better camera with depth of perception and a clearer lens. Yet again, although I have creative juices, I don't spend enough time on them, or don't have enough time, to justify trying out a myriad of programs to do whatever, so I either get the shot right, or I move on.

Are you on some new allergy medication



That's the best thing I've ever heard

when the tree is dank

https://scontent-sjc2-1.xx.fbcdn.net...22&oe=5891E575

https://web.archive.org/web/20040204...sicbanter.com/

https://web.archive.org/web/20041231...sicbanter.com/

https://web.archive.org/web/20050721...sicbanter.com/

https://web.archive.org/web/20061116...sicbanter.com/

https://web.archive.org/web/20060111...sicbanter.com/

I was gonna post this here but I wanted to get my preorder in before I did that.

You just validated my point, which is that you'll keep using Excel for image editing.

If I went into a job interview for graphic design and told them I use Excel for image editing, I'd be laughed out of the building.

The end.

Very much so. Excel is such a silly program.

You're a silly program.

You're a silly dad.

You're a silly kid.

You're a silly mod.

You're a silly non-mod.

*lifts shirt to reveal shiny Ban Hammer*

****! Its....it's beautiful.

.

You just remember that Ki was your mod one time you ungrateful... sir.

Nope.

.

lol when did you add that bottom link to your sig, Frown?

http://i.imgur.com/smAJ8cs.png

**** yeah, top of the leaderboard for team deathmatch. We lost, but still. This game is ****ing amazing.

15 Creative Halloween Costumes You Can Make At Home For Free - TheRichest

#15 is cat and I'm pretty sure that's evidence of Ki having zero contact with any women his age, because come Halloween, 90% of the girls that dress up will be cats. Not very creative at all.

I'm unsure what you mean when the article is strictly to point out costumes you can do for free. I don't control whether the editor puts "creative" in the title or not. That's not what the original title was when I wrote it.

Also, before you point it out, for some reason the mummy section was cut off, and that wasn't done on my part. I emailed my editor about it already.

I like this one. Almost avant garde.

http://therichest.imgix.net/2016/10/...h=390&fit=crop

Tell your editor to suck a fat dick.

I'm a tad bit peeved at it as well because it's a pretty misleading title that I wasn't really looking to provide. Not to mention I proofread the article time and time again, and the mistake still went through.

Oh well.

They can't all be zingers, but I think you're taking that phrase too literally by going for zero zingers total.

Well no, but it seems rather pointless to proofread my articles when mistakes get through anyway. That's more what I'm getting at.

You gotta work on your reading skills man.

Excel is a well-oiled machine. No WD-40 required.

Pretty sure there are more jobs than graphic design that require knowledge of Excel and its advanced features (not just photo imaging). I already made that point to you. You made an issue of this benign situation from the beginning, not me, so I was just explaining it to you as a courtesy.

Excel has certainly allowed Aux-In Airlines the breadth, depth and freedom to be on autopilot (after manual entries) in multiple facets of life. It is Washington's John Adams, no matter the coordinates or the destination. No matter the relevancy of Chenopodium quinoa or that of the Oryza glaberrima. No matter the flow from the bursting riverbanks of Macular Degeneration, or that of the shuttered rigs of exploration from the deepest of seas.

Excel is the treasure trove. It is the GPS. It is the protector. It is the lamp on at night.

Edit: ****!!!

What do you mean?

If you proofread something a bunch of times and there are still mistakes, you ain't no proofreader boy.

I read it over time and time again and the section in question was not the way it shows up on the finished product. I know that for a fact because I have the saved text backed up and it's without error.