Music Banter

Music Banter (https://www.musicbanter.com/)
-   The Lounge (https://www.musicbanter.com/lounge/)
-   -   Urban's Top 100 'The Most Annoying & Over Rated Items In The World' Thread (https://www.musicbanter.com/lounge/49789-urbans-top-100-most-annoying-over-rated-items-world-thread.html)

Urban Hat€monger ? 06-07-2010 04:22 AM

Urban's Top 100 'The Most Annoying & Over Rated Items In The World' Thread
 
I almost feel incomplete when I'm not doing one of these.
Like the last one, this isn't in any order.

I'm going against all my working class roots here but this stuff is vile.
I've never liked beer, I've never even pretended to like beer.
I might have the occasional one to be social but that's more not to rock the boat and be difficult if someone else is buying a round then having any great love for it.
I can honestly say I have never ever seen the appeal of drinking beer at home. I just don't find it refreshing in the slightest and to be honest at least in a pub you can vomit on someone else's carpet rather than your own.
While everybody else in England watches the World Cup from their sofa with a huge case of beer in the fridge i'll be much happier with a fridge full of cold refreshing fruit juice.

The main reason I dislike beer isn't so much the taste aspect though. I mean I drink whiskey so I can't really use the taste as an excuse to include beer here.
It's more to do with the sheer amount of volume of the stuff you have to consume of it to have any effect on you.
Why the hell would I want to knock back pint after pint after pint of the stuff when instead I can get the same amount of drunkness from casually sipping on a Jack Daniels & Coke without all the sweating, belching, farting pissing & dribbling that comes with drinking several pints of beer.

It's a sartorial thing as well, I want to stand there sipping on a whiskey or a brandy looking cool & sophisticated just in case I attract the attention of any nice ladies that happen to be in the vicinity. And if you are a woman and your idea of coolness & sophistication is watching some bloke necking 5 pints & belching in your face then quite honestly I'm sure i'll manage without your attention.

And what the hell is America's obsession with 'Lite' beers?
Isn't that like drinking beer that's twice as pointless?

TheCunningStunt 06-07-2010 04:32 AM

I'm the same! I've always had people moan at me because I dislike lager, but I drink it just to be social. Although I prefer Cider even though that tastes like piss after a while. Lager really is shit. Spirits > Beer. Despite it not being 'blokey'.

Bulldog 06-07-2010 04:32 AM

Agreed on basically all counts. Also, if you're throwing a party and get a few crates of the stuff in, you're pretty much guaranteed to spend about half the day after picking up stray bottles and mopping up stains in the carpet from the stuff. That said, I do love going down the pub and trying out some of the local brews - tastes about a gazillion times better than any of the cheap shite in the supermarkets. And I dread to think what 'lite' beers taste like, probably a diluted form of Corona (which never really crossed my mind as being possible 'til now). Whiskey and gin over beer anyday for me.

Cool thread.

Mojo 06-07-2010 04:33 AM

Bah. I will happily be the guy necking 8 or 9 pints of beer and belching in the ladies face. Well, hopefully i wouldnt do the latter but i like beer. Infact im not much of a spirit drinker, i could get by on consuming only beers and lagers alcohol-wise for the rest of my life and not miss the alternatives.

Im looking forward to this thread. Here we go again...

Tea Supremacist 06-07-2010 04:38 AM

What about 'ladies' that drink beer? Give me a cold Stella over spirits any day. Apartfrom the rare occasions when I find a pub that sells Sailor Jerry's anyway...

TheCunningStunt 06-07-2010 04:40 AM

If I see a 'lady' in a bar and I quite like the look of her, if she's drinking lager it would probably put me off. Girls drinking lager = common.

Bulldog 06-07-2010 04:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheCunningStunt (Post 878300)
Girls drinking lager = freakish.

Fixed ;)

TheCunningStunt 06-07-2010 04:44 AM

Exactly. :D She'd have to be something special for me to still be interested after watching her neck lager.

Tea Supremacist 06-07-2010 04:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheCunningStunt (Post 878300)
If I see a 'lady' in a bar and I quite like the look of her, if she's drinking lager it would probably put me off. Girls drinking lager = common.

Does it make a difference if it's a pint or a bottle? I'm lady-like enough to insist on drinking bottles rather than swilling a pint everywhere...

There's an important distiction between bottle drinkers and pint drinkers!

Urban Hat€monger ? 06-07-2010 04:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tea Supremacist (Post 878298)
What about 'ladies' that drink beer? Give me a cold Stella over spirits any day. Apartfrom the rare occasions when I find a pub that sells Sailor Jerry's anyway...

Depends if it's from a bottle or not and how drunk she is.

TheCunningStunt 06-07-2010 04:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tea Supremacist (Post 878303)
Does it make a difference if it's a pint or a bottle? I'm lady-like enough to insist on drinking bottles rather than swilling a pint everywhere...

There's an important distiction between bottle drinkers and pint drinkers!

Hm, good question. I think a glass is actually more appealing than a can/bottle. I don't know other people's feelings on it, but I know more "ruff and ready" people and they're like "oooh just give me the can", I insist on having a glass.

So it's a tricky one, I don't think either would sway my decision. I'd probably avert my eyes to someone with a white wine spritzer.

Mojo 06-07-2010 04:49 AM

Actually im quite partial to lasses who drink pints. A lass who can attempt to drink me under the table if you park a case of Brown Ale infront of her is a lass after my own heart. :)

Urban Hat€monger ? 06-07-2010 04:56 AM


Yippie!!

Now I can check MusicBanter for updates any time any place any where on a screen the size of a postage stamp.
Hooray for technology

As far as I'm concerned no email is so important that it can't wait till I'm next on a computer rather than shell out a couple of hundred quid for one of these bloody things.

TheCunningStunt 06-07-2010 04:56 AM

To drink me under the table, she'd have to drink a fair bit... And I find nothing more unattractive than drunk slappers trying to manoeuvre themselves in their high heels whilst slurring their words.

Tea Supremacist 06-07-2010 04:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheCunningStunt (Post 878305)
Hm, good question. I think a glass is actually more appealing than a can/bottle. I don't know other people's feelings on it, but I know more "ruff and ready" people and they're like "oooh just give me the can", I insist on having a glass.

So it's a tricky one, I don't think either would sway my decision. I'd probably avert my eyes to someone with a white wine spritzer.

Ahh, see, now drinking out of cans is a different kettle of fish.
My (slightly skewed) logic for beer drinking ladies is that Pints look bad (and are far more easily spilt - nobody likes wastage of drink). Bottles look slightly more in scale in lady hands than a pint, but cans... Oh no. Not ever in public. Just wrong.

Bulldog 06-07-2010 05:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Urban Hatemonger (Post 878308)

Back of the net again sir :D

Totally pointless items. I've had my internet-less phone for two or three years now. As long as I can call people, send texts and play that mini golf game on it, I see absolutely no point in getting something new, nevermid one of those confusing as hell touchscreen ones.

Antonio 06-07-2010 05:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Urban Hatemonger (Post 878290)
I almost feel incomplete when I'm not doing one of these.
Like the last one, this isn't in any order.

I'm going against all my working class roots here but this stuff is vile.
I've never liked beer, I've never even pretended to like beer.
I might have the occasional one to be social but that's more not to rock the boat and be difficult if someone else is buying a round then having any great love for it.
I can honestly say I have never ever seen the appeal of drinking beer at home. I just don't find it refreshing in the slightest and to be honest at least in a pub you can vomit on someone else's carpet rather than your own.
While everybody else in England watches the World Cup from their sofa with a huge case of beer in the fridge i'll be much happier with a fridge full of cold refreshing fruit juice.

The main reason I dislike beer isn't so much the taste aspect though. I mean I drink whiskey so I can't really use the taste as an excuse to include beer here.
It's more to do with the sheer amount of volume of the stuff you have to consume of it to have any effect on you.
Why the hell would I want to knock back pint after pint after pint of the stuff when instead I can get the same amount of drunkness from casually sipping on a Jack Daniels & Coke without all the sweating, belching, farting pissing & dribbling that comes with drinking several pints of beer.

It's a sartorial thing as well, I want to stand there sipping on a whiskey or a brandy looking cool & sophisticated just in case I attract the attention of any nice ladies that happen to be in the vicinity. And if you are a woman and your idea of coolness & sophistication is watching some bloke necking 5 pints & belching in your face then quite honestly I'm sure i'll manage without your attention.

And what the hell is America's obsession with 'Lite' beers?
Isn't that like drinking beer that's twice as pointless?

wisdom.:clap:

TheCunningStunt 06-07-2010 05:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tea Supremacist (Post 878310)
Ahh, see, now drinking out of cans is a different kettle of fish.
My (slightly skewed) logic for beer drinking ladies is that Pints look bad (and are far more easily spilt - nobody likes wastage of drink). Bottles look slightly more in scale in lady hands than a pint, but cans... Oh no. Not ever in public. Just wrong.

If they can carry it well (not literally) but I mean if they don't look like common scum and don't get absolutely smashed then maybe I'd let it slide. ;)

Internet phones are pointless. You're never too far away from a computer really are you? The only time I might need one is when I start work. On the spot research but even then, I just need to be prepared with information. Internet phones are just used for people who spend all day on their computer on Facebook, they decide to go out for an adventure and whilst they're out, they decide to update their Facebook status telling us what they're doing. "**** is on the bus lol"

Tea Supremacist 06-07-2010 05:09 AM

I don't even know how to use the internet on my phone. It sends texts, it rings people and it plays music. I'm not quite sure what else I would need a phone for to be honest... Updating my Facebook status from "Gemma is on the bus" to "Gemma is now off the bus" to "Gemma is drinking tea in a cafe" holds no appeal for me...

Bulldog 06-07-2010 05:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tea Supremacist (Post 878316)
I don't even know how to use the internet on my phone. It sends texts, it rings people and it plays music. I'm not quite sure what else I would need a phone for to be honest... Updating my Facebook status from "Gemma is on the bus" to "Gemma is now off the bus" to "Gemma is drinking tea in a cafe" holds no appeal for me...

^ That as well.

Talking of which, I hope facebook's somewhere on this list...

TheCunningStunt 06-07-2010 05:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tea Supremacist (Post 878316)
I don't even know how to use the internet on my phone. It sends texts, it rings people and it plays music. I'm not quite sure what else I would need a phone for to be honest... Updating my Facebook status from "Gemma is on the bus" to "Gemma is now off the bus" to "Gemma is drinking tea in a cafe" holds no appeal for me...

I have people that do it, they feel the need to tell me they're on the bus and they're late for college.. Like I give a shit. My phone has unlimited texts and 800 minutes and that's all I need.

Janszoon 06-07-2010 05:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Urban Hatemonger (Post 878290)
And what the hell is America's obsession with 'Lite' beers?
Isn't that like drinking beer that's twice as pointless?

Actually, after your second paragraph I'm surprised that you don't see the the point of light beer. It has roughly the same percentage of alcohol as a lot of other beer (for example Bud Light is 4.2% alcohol while Guinness Daught is 4.0%) but by virtue of its being "light", it's much easier to drink a lot of it than it would be to drink a lot of a heavier beer. Also, in my personal opinion it tastes better but I know most people probably disagree with me on that.

Otherwise, though, I totally hear what you're saying about beer. I have it sometimes but my preferred beverage is bourbon.

Tea Supremacist 06-07-2010 05:34 AM

Saying that though, I did once use my friends phone to tell the Facebook world that I saw Rik Waller running away from a group of kids throwing pebbles at him. I think that sometimes there may be exceptional circumstances... Otherwise, yes, generally overrated as a whole.

TheCunningStunt 06-07-2010 05:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tea Supremacist (Post 878329)
Saying that though, I did once use my friends phone to tell the Facebook world that I saw Rik Waller running away from a group of kids throwing pebbles at him. I think that sometimes there may be exceptional circumstances... Otherwise, yes, generally overrated as a whole.

That kind of news just can't wait until you get home, so I will permit that. ;)

Urban Hat€monger ? 06-07-2010 05:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Janszoon (Post 878328)
Actually, after your second paragraph I'm surprised that you don't see the the point of light beer. It has roughly the same percentage of alcohol as a lot of other beer (for example Bud Light is 4.2% alcohol while Guinness Daught is 4.0%) but by virtue of its being "light", it's much easier to drink a lot of it than it would be to drink a lot of a heavier beer. Also, in my personal opinion it tastes better but I know most people probably disagree with me on that.

Otherwise, though, I totally hear what you're saying about beer. I have it sometimes but my preferred beverage is bourbon.

Ahh that'll be the source of my confusion then.

After reading up on it it would appear that Lite beers in the US means low calorie whereas in most parts of the world it means low alcohol (Under 3.5).

Forget I said anything

Janszoon 06-07-2010 06:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Urban Hatemonger (Post 878337)
Ahh that'll be the source of my confusion then.

After reading up on it it would appear that Lite beers in the US means low calorie whereas in most parts of the world it means low alcohol (Under 3.5).

Forget I said anything

That's interesting. And, yeah, that kind of light beer sounds pretty pointless to me too. Sort of like non-alcoholic beer, something I've never understood the point of either. Tastes worse than regular beer, won't get you drunk. Nice combination there.

NumberNineDream 06-07-2010 06:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheCunningStunt (Post 878309)
To drink me under the table, she'd have to drink a fair bit... And I find nothing more unattractive than drunk slappers trying to manoeuvre themselves in their high heels whilst slurring their words.

Speaking for the lasses that get drunk on beer, and beer alone, I'd like to assure you: we don't wear them high heels to the pub.

The high heels drinkers, come with martinis, margueritas, tequila and cosmopolitans.

TheCunningStunt 06-07-2010 06:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Janszoon (Post 878340)
That's interesting. And, yeah, that kind of light beer sounds pretty pointless to me too. Sort of like non-alcoholic beer, something I've never understood the point of either. Tastes worse than regular beer, won't get you drunk. Nice combination there.

Non-alcoholic beer, I've never understood the use of that. Unless it's for alcoholics who are trying to go cold turkey it seems pretty useless.

Urban Hat€monger ? 06-07-2010 06:34 AM

http://i94.photobucket.com/albums/l9...nH/beerwin.jpg
I wish i'd thought of doing this for the first entry pic earlier :(

Mojo 06-07-2010 07:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NumberNineDream (Post 878342)
Speaking for the lasses that get drunk on beer, and beer alone, I'd like to assure you: we don't wear them high heels to the pub.

The high heels drinkers, come with martinis, margueritas, tequila and cosmopolitans.

The girls ive known who drank pints werent the high heel types either. They were feminine enough to be attractive but not "too" girly. Theres nothing wrong with being "too" girly, thats just a personal preference but give me attractive and a beer drinker i can have a laugh and get wasted with like i would my mates over alot of the girls i see in the pub anyday.

FETCHER. 06-07-2010 09:18 AM

Er I wear high heels and often enjoy a nice bottle of beer. I'm a big vodka drinker, meaning if I go to asda I dont buy beer, but i do enjoy a good bottle every now and again :). and I dont get ratarsed to the point where I cant walk. I never do that.

edit: I love urbans rants.

Insane Guest 06-07-2010 09:45 AM

I have a feeling iPod's are going to be pretty high on the list.

duga 06-07-2010 11:37 AM

ipods? No way. I can't live without my ipod and I doubt anyone here could either (well...an mp3 player at least). I loved the days of CD's...but come on. Every album I own in one tiny place? How is that overrated?

TheCunningStunt 06-07-2010 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duga (Post 878472)
ipods? No way. I can't live without my ipod and I doubt anyone here could either (well...an mp3 player at least). I loved the days of CD's...but come on. Every album I own in one tiny place? How is that overrated?

The only problem with iPods are you can't fit all your music on. Especially since I bought a 30 gig in 2005, back then that was an unthinkable amount of GB.. now it's filled up, if I want to upgrade to one with a bigger memory, it will cost too much. Ipods aren't overrated, they're overpriced.

duga 06-07-2010 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheCunningStunt (Post 878478)
Ipods aren't overrated, they're overpriced.

I can definitely agree with this. I recently upgraded to a 160GB after my 60GB died on me...though it set me a back a few coins, I am definitely loving the space.

TheCunningStunt 06-07-2010 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duga (Post 878485)
I can definitely agree with this. I recently upgraded to a 160GB after my 60GB died on me...though it set me a back a few coins, I am definitely loving the space.

How much are 160GBs? That's what I really need, the space would be great. The thing about music, it's always gonna go up, never down. Unless you decide to trim some albums from your collection that you don't like. We all have them, the ones that are just sat there and you have no intention of listening to them.

RVCA 06-07-2010 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duga (Post 878485)
I can definitely agree with this. I recently upgraded to a 160GB after my 60GB died on me...though it set me a back a few coins, I am definitely loving the space.

I'm just about to do the same. Conveniently, about the same time I filled up my 2 year old 80gb it started having hardware problems, so I don't have much choice. 160gb it is.

Well, I lied. I do have a choice. I could get one of those silly iPod touches, but they're quite expensive and I would probably never use the other features. I could also get one of those tiny iPod Nanos, but I feel like I would lose or break it. Also, both the touch and nano don't come with enough memory, so I'd be cherrypicking from my library what I want to put on them.

gunnels 06-07-2010 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheCunningStunt (Post 878488)
How much are 160GBs?

I paid $270 USD for mine, which converts to (if the online converter is up-to-date) 186 British Pounds.
A pretty shiny penny.
EDIT: That included taxes.

TheCunningStunt 06-07-2010 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gunnels (Post 878494)
I paid $270 USD for mine, which converts to (if the online converter is up-to-date) 186 British Pounds.
A pretty shiny penny.

Hmm, I may have to invest in one soon. My current iPod is too small in capacity and really scratched and the screen only half works.. 5 years on and I have to part with it.

duga 06-07-2010 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheCunningStunt (Post 878488)
How much are 160GBs? That's what I really need, the space would be great. The thing about music, it's always gonna go up, never down. Unless you decide to trim some albums from your collection that you don't like. We all have them, the ones that are just sat there and you have no intention of listening to them.

It's around $250 American...looking at the UK site it looks like 193£. I didn't think it was too bad, but I am definitely worried for when I fill this thing up. I don't mind trimming albums here and there, but for the most part I like my whole collection regardless of how much I listen to something. Add the fact that I am now a bitrate whore and that space gets filled up quick. I also highly doubt apple will go much higher than 160GB. The only people that would need more are people like us here at MB and we represent a very very small portion of the population. Most people are happy with 5 GB (sad). Damn...


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:02 PM.


© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.