The Batlord |
02-04-2012 12:44 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atrocious
(Post 1150071)
All I have to say to any of that angry bs is this: the police are not in place to protect people. They are there to uphold the law.
|
Um...okay. This statement is supposed to prove what exactly?
Quote:
Besides, I bet if there was some ******* going crazy on me in the park while I'm walking my dog and I had my .45 they'd rather I shot him than sic my bulldog on 'em. In fact they'd most likely make me put the dog down if it did.
|
I have no idea whatsoever why you would think that. If you have no real argument to make, just admit it and quit spouting pointless bull****.
Quote:
They have a gun, a tazer, club, cuffs, maglight, and dog. Which seriously makes more sense to take somebody down with?:bonkhead:
|
The non-lethal one which offers the least amount of risk. The tazer may be a better choice depending on the situation, but I don't see how the dog was an unreasonable choice in this case.
Quote:
You cry about the cop being at risk they signed up for the ****!! What about putting the dog at risk? The cop is wearing body armor and knows what a gun is-the dog is naked and knows what his ass taste like. The man gets paid, the dog gets a biscut.
|
So are you saying that you're a vegan now? I'm all for animal rights, but I still value a human (or for that matter a sentient extraterrestrial or artificial intelligence) life more than a dog's life the same way I'd value a dog's life over an earthworm's. I'm sure you do too, so I don't know why you're using this argument.
Quote:
Top it off, as far as I'm concerned not being able to catch him ain't an excuse for anything but going to the gym.
|
Please. It looks to me like you just hate cops and look for any excuse to bitch about them.
|