Terrible retort. Try harder next time.

Pardon me for incorporating a little bit of humour into my posts. I doubt you'll take your fingers out of your ears and try to understand this, but my post was in response to this statement in particular, which seems to suggest that cosmetics are more important than ethics.

If I'm off the mark, specifically tell me how. Please. I would genuinely love to have a reasoned debate with you instead of a cranky ****storm.

Everything you're posting has been countered already multiple times by me and other posters so we're pissing in the wind going over the same things again.

You ignored my earlier post though.

Porn is a terrible source for sexual education and does not promote a healthy body image. What dicks are considered suitable for porn should be of no importance to the rest of us. Your porn argument is akin to saying "I wonder why 99% of the breasts you see in porn have plastic implans? Because natural boobs are ugly". Therefore, everyone should get impants.

Besides, uncircumsized dicks aren't considered ugly over here - frankly, I was surprised when I first heard that male circumsizion was widespread in the US. Very few people are circumsized in Norway, apart from certain religious minorities.

Listen guys, I don't come to this place as if I'm stepping into a high school debate contest. I'm not looking for "points" in an effort to win anything. I say my piece, you say yours. No-one's minds are going to get changed.

- I happen to know someone who had to get it done for medical purposes.
- I happen to know he suffered pretty bad afterwards.
- I'm happy my parents chose to have me done when I was a newborn.
- I noted that the vast majority of pro dicks are snipped.
- I noted that over 80% of US males are snipped.
- I noted that it's done to females purely to limit their sexuality.

Let me know if you disagree with any of these points.

Having a dick snipped as a newborn = get implants as a teenager or 20-something? :rofl:

If a girl is born with huge beef curtains can we trim them to prevent infections and because they don't look pretty?

Edit: I noted a lot of things and you haven't addressed a single one of them.

- I happen to know someone who had to get it done for medical purposes.

That's a shame. I know somebody who got hit by a car.

- I happen to know he suffered pretty bad afterwards.

Funnily enough he also suffered badly, them cars hurt.

- I'm happy my parents chose to have me done when I was a newborn.

Did you have the same medical problem as your friend in an alternative timeline?

- I noted that the vast majority of pro dicks are snipped.

See below. And also vanity.

- I noted that over 80% of US males are snipped.

Not an argument.

- I noted that it's done to females purely to limit their sexuality.

And it would be unethical to perform FGM.

Also, anyone object to me copying the relevant posts over to the Men's Rights thread?

Why don't you just move this entire discussion there since it's gone way off the OP.

That's what I meant. I'll do it.