Why does there seem to be a stigma attached to advocate for Men's Rights? - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > Community Center > The Lounge
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-14-2017, 04:29 PM   #1 (permalink)
SOPHIE FOREVER
 
Frownland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East of the Southern North American West
Posts: 35,541
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Batlord View Post
My safeword was "No, mommy!"
Mine was Uncle because I always felt more comfortable getting spanked when he was watching.
__________________
Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth.

Frownland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2017, 04:06 PM   #2 (permalink)
Zum Henker Defätist!!
 
The Batlord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Beating GNR at DDR and keying Axl's new car
Posts: 48,199
Default

__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.R.R. Tolkien
There is only one bright spot and that is the growing habit of disgruntled men of dynamiting factories and power-stations; I hope that, encouraged now as ‘patriotism’, may remain a habit! But it won’t do any good, if it is not universal.
The Batlord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2017, 06:38 PM   #3 (permalink)
Mord
 
Zhanteimi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 4,873
Default

.
__________________
Zhanteimi

LetsTalkMusic

Last edited by Zhanteimi; 05-01-2018 at 04:39 PM.
Zhanteimi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2017, 09:08 PM   #4 (permalink)
Toasted Poster
 
Chula Vista's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: SoCal by way of Boston
Posts: 11,332
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mord View Post
ITT: Chula vs. MB

Thanks, guys, for always entertaining!
__________________

“The fact that we live at the bottom of a deep gravity well,
on the surface of a gas covered planet going around a nuclear fireball 90 million miles away
and think this to be normal is obviously some indication of how skewed our perspective tends to be.”
Chula Vista is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2017, 08:23 PM   #5 (permalink)
Dragon
 
Wpnfire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Kansas, United States
Posts: 2,744
Default

Safewords are for wimps.
Wpnfire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2017, 09:41 PM   #6 (permalink)
Cuter Than Post Malone.
 
Lucem Ferre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 4,978
Default

Ahhh, a bunch of people who have never had kid telling a parent how to parent. An older one at that.



Not to beat a dead horse, but I'm going to do it anyways, I thought about how uncomfortable I would be doing feminine things as a male. Then I thought about what if I woke up and I all of a sudden had female genitals rather than my male genitals. I would feel extremely uncomfortable in that identity despite my physical form. Though, I have been born and raised as a male with a male body and can't quite get why somebody who was born and raised as one gender could feel like a different gender, I think I understand maybe a little more about gender identity through that.

Now, on the topic of redefining words to fit an agenda, how do people feel about some college campuses telling students that racism is defined as systematic oppression towards a race rather than bigotry towards a race thus pushing the idea that bigotry towards white people is more tolerated because it isn't racism because white people aren't systematically oppressed?
__________________
Quote:
Lucem, you're right, it's silly to talk about what I would or wouldn't do IRL. Glad you brought it up. Maybe you should write an instrumental about it. I recommend a piano paired with a clarinet. With ambient sounds of you hanging from your shower curtain you ****ing failure.

Art Is Dead. Buy My ****.
Lucem Ferre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2017, 04:09 AM   #7 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: The Black Country
Posts: 8,827
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucem Ferre View Post
Now, on the topic of redefining words to fit an agenda, how do people feel about some college campuses telling students that racism is defined as systematic oppression towards a race rather than bigotry towards a race thus pushing the idea that bigotry towards white people is more tolerated because it isn't racism because white people aren't systematically oppressed?
It's not defined as that.

Of course you can be racist to whites.
Cuthbert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2017, 10:06 PM   #8 (permalink)
SOPHIE FOREVER
 
Frownland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East of the Southern North American West
Posts: 35,541
Default

The intelligent people in the class fight critical race theory with critical theory and tell the professor about how that concept of race is an unnecessary social construct of academia when we have modifying words like systematic racism and interpersonal racism to catch all forms of the word.
__________________
Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth.

Frownland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2017, 10:27 PM   #9 (permalink)
Cuter Than Post Malone.
 
Lucem Ferre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 4,978
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frownland View Post
The intelligent people in the class fight critical race theory with critical theory and tell the professor about how that concept of race is an unnecessary social construct of academia when we have modifying words like systematic racism and interpersonal racism to catch all forms of the word.
Not enough intelligent people in those classes I guess.

Edit: What they seem to be doing is trying to say that racism towards whites is justifiable. I had one of the stereotypical liberals from my main forum tell me that racism towards whites doesn't count as racism because of it. Then another person informed me that even though they disagree, it's what is being taught on college campuses.
__________________
Quote:
Lucem, you're right, it's silly to talk about what I would or wouldn't do IRL. Glad you brought it up. Maybe you should write an instrumental about it. I recommend a piano paired with a clarinet. With ambient sounds of you hanging from your shower curtain you ****ing failure.

Art Is Dead. Buy My ****.
Lucem Ferre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2017, 12:20 AM   #10 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Paedantic Basterd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 5,184
Default

How racism is defined academically differs from field to field and from professor to professor. I was confused by the idea that "you can't be racist towards white people" until I probed deep enough into the issue to learn that under some working definitions, "racism" refers not to prejudice or discrimination alone, but to participation in or benefit from a societal or institutionalized system that racism is a product of.

The idea being that because white people are always in some way benefiting from such a system whereas people of colour have less equal, more mixed (usually worse) experiences in the same system, it's not possible to be racist towards white people--because that involves setting up a society and institution in which their whiteness results in their oppression, which describes probably no society currently in existence.

Not an expert by any means, but this is my understanding of what people mean when they say you can't be racist to whites. It's not because those people are libtards, it's just that they have a different working understanding of the term "racism" that is much more nuanced than the word the common public knows and engages with.
Paedantic Basterd is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.