Zelda

https://camo.githubusercontent.com/9...6e6b312e6a7067

I completed Gat out of Hell a couple years back and I'd say it's barely worth the few hours it takes. Pretty lazy story campaign and not much else to do. You fight the same big boss fight 3-4 times, then a lame fight against Satan. No noteworthy missions in between - just lazy filler missions with the same objective over and over. Blah.

tru tru. i think i logged the most hours on SR2 but IV was just so ****ing fun that it might be the one I have the fondest memories of.

Yossarian and Dale Cooper shaped me.

3 & 4 are the most fun, but 2 is still ridiculously fun. Basically all 4 games are amazing.

you're not wrong

SR in general >>> GTA

ok now you're wrong

when the GTA games are good (San Andreas, IV, Vice, V) they're amongst the best games to play.

nah **** it sr is def better than gta now that gta decided that it wanted to be a tv show. sr 2 was better than gta 4, and after that sr just ran away with being massively better.

it's just everything stupid and fun that san andreas promised to be and failed to deliver on with 4.

sr=skyrim right

SR = Deadly Premonition

i'm convinced you didn't play 4 or 5 cause they two incredibly engrossing storylines. i think SR has obviously distanced itself from GTA since 2 though, they're not trying to be competition. they're trying to be an entirely different game. and that's why 3 & 4 are the best for me.

Cheyenne Bodie[Clint Walker-1955-63]quiet adventurer who just went from place to place taking jobs as he found them,but always on the side of right..my favorite western series with a killer theme song.

I have not played 5 cause I really have not given the slightest **** after the disappointment of 4, but 4 was a game that left all the fun of San Andreas behind to try to be a cheap Sopranos knockoff that left all the amazing, tongue-in-cheek open world **** in the toilet in the failed idea that it was a game with a story line that would be interesting past the first time you played it. It felt like a game for people who cared about reviewing the game rather than playing it. SR2 and beyond took the actual fun gameplay elements from GTA and actually did what the **** I wanted.

Chris Redfield.

Nah, Jill Valentine >

I don't want to mate with Jill, though.

Well, I may consider it.

Human or beefcake?

Obviously beefcake. Why would anyone want the Chris that can't punch boulders into a volcano?

The real question: beret Jill or ponytail Jill?

Beret Jill > lesser Jills

That's nostalgia talking. Jill absolutely rocks a ponytail.

RE: Nemesis Jill > Ponytail Jill

RE4 boob spider Jill > RE: Nemesis Jill

You mean RE5?

Silent Hill > Resident Evil

Crapcom > Fuckonami

Rim me > Blow me

Except for with Silent Hill being better than Resident Evil.

Edit: Actually, Kojima > both.

Silent Hill as a series is pretty shit. The first three are great, the rest are purile. RE has four solid old school survival horror games, two insanely fun action horror games, and a reboot that wasn't so abominable that the company that owned the license decided that making the series into a pachinko fuckfest would be better than beating the dead horse any further.

Yeah I don't understand why RE 5 and 6 get **** on. They do exactly what they're trying to do very well and just so happen to be associated with games from a mostly different genre.

Cause Silent Hill at it's best was better than any Resident Evil. Mostly because of Kojima though. I've never played through any of those games though. Wait, no, I've played RE 0, 4 and 5.

works for me

That's exactly why though. People didn't want action games fro RE they wanted horror games. Maybe if they were just spin offs it'd be fine, but imagine if the next Mortal Kombat acted more like Super Smash Bros. Could be a good game, but would probably piss most people off for not being an arcade style fighter like they want from MK.

I think RE 5 and 6 are pretty weak as pure action games too. Compare them to old RE games and they're not very good. Compare them to games like Gears of War and they're not very good either. I'm not even really a fan of the older RE games, but RE6 was a disaster in my eyes. RE Revelation was somewhat better, but still had more crappy stages than good ones.

I never played 6 but I got enjoyment out of 5. Mostly from co-op though.

How did this thread turn into a conversation about video games?

Video games typically have fictional characters.

Are they the only medium which contains fictional characters?

Yes.