What's The Latest Film You Have Seen? - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > Community Center > Media
Register Blogging Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-03-2012, 08:15 PM   #12191 (permalink)
Still sends his reguards.
 
bob.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Trying to get out of the cat town....
Posts: 5,039
Default

....you made me snort coffee

Sorry it's for God Bless America
bob. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2012, 03:56 AM   #12192 (permalink)
art is sold for money
 
Scissorman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Belgrade, Serbia
Posts: 730
Default



The Cabin In The Woods

My rating 0/10. This is one of the worst movies I have ever seen. I'm not really sure what they were trying to accomplish with it, but whatever it was, they have failed miserably. My only reaction to this was facepalm.
Scissorman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2012, 06:28 AM   #12193 (permalink)
Juicious Maximus III
 
Guybrush's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Scabb Island
Posts: 6,525
Default

You can't have seen many bad movies, Scissorman
__________________
Something Completely Different
Guybrush is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2012, 06:34 AM   #12194 (permalink)
Live by the Sword
 
Howard the Duck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Posts: 9,075
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scissorman View Post
The Cabin In The Woods

My rating 0/10. This is one of the worst movies I have ever seen. I'm not really sure what they were trying to accomplish with it, but whatever it was, they have failed miserably. My only reaction to this was facepalm.
no big deal if I haven't seen it yet then
__________________


Malaise is THE dominant human predilection.

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Virgin View Post
what? i don't understand you. farming is for vegetables, not for meat. if ou disagree with a farming practice, you disagree on a vegetable. unless you have a different definition of farming.
Howard the Duck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2012, 06:46 AM   #12195 (permalink)
art is sold for money
 
Scissorman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Belgrade, Serbia
Posts: 730
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tore View Post
You can't have seen many bad movies, Scissorman
I was promised this mind-blowing, completely new and original approach to the complete horror genre, but I ended up checking on imdb if it was the right movie. Sadly, it was.
Scissorman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2012, 07:12 AM   #12196 (permalink)
Yac
Super Moderator
 
Yac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: It's a secret too.
Posts: 1,363
Default


Attack the Block
This movie was a big surprise. Something that I thought would be stupid enough to entertain but not dumb enough for your brain to hurt wasn't that stupid at all.
In fact, it's a great movie! Surprisingly well written characters, good dialogue , good enough special effects, several very funny moments.
I wasn't bored at all.
7.5/10
Yac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2012, 07:19 AM   #12197 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
moserw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 154
Default



The Bourne Legacy - A reboot without Jason Bourne. Fast, furious action... usual CIA scums at work. Pretty Rachel Weisz plays a doctor!
__________________
Last.FM

For me, the backdrop of half the experiences of life includes music - Amy Grant
moserw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2012, 07:31 AM   #12198 (permalink)
Juicious Maximus III
 
Guybrush's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Scabb Island
Posts: 6,525
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scissorman View Post
I was promised this mind-blowing, completely new and original approach to the complete horror genre, but I ended up checking on imdb if it was the right movie. Sadly, it was.
That does seem a bit exaggerated. I wouldn't call it a completely original approach as I think it uses all those tired clichès. It just does it in a very self-conscious and somewhat parodic way.

It's like calling Shaun of the Dead a completely original approach to the zombie genre. I don't think so - again all the clichès were there, it was just refreshingly humorous.

I can see how it could only disappoint if those were your expectations.


edit :

The Woman in Black

On a different note, I've seen the new Woman in Black starring Daniel Radcliffe or however his name is spelled. I'm already quite fond of the made-for-TV movie from 1989 which was both spooky and engaging and so of course I can't help compare the two. What the new one has is that modern big budget polish and all the scary things are definitely spooky. I feel sorry for the little kids who saw this because their favorite Harry Potter actor is in it because it has some very effective scares. However, that's about it, I think. Compared to the old film, this is very one dimensional. The soundtrack and general mood is always dark and spooky, even when there's nothing wrong going on. There's just no light here to deepen the shadows and that sort of one dimensionality feels fake in a way. The world is not like that. Neither is the old movie which feels more real as a result.

I also felt that the dramaturgy worked much better in the old film. There are a couple of things I can point out that I think were better in the old, but I guess I should do so in spoilers :

Spoiler for The Woman in Black, old and new:
In this new version, protagonist Arthur Kipps is a widower and the movie starts with him contemplating suicide. The old Arthur Kidd (slight namechange) was a struggling family man, married with children. He was not suicidal. The new Arthur Kipps has less to lose - so what if he dies? He's already suicidal. Overall, I worried more about what would happen to the old Arthur Kidd.

Another thing I like a lot about the old is that while working in the haunted house, the old Arthur Kidd records the story of his work on wax tubes which was an early recording medium. The film is made so that he himself becomes the narrator of his own horror story, sharing his terror with the viewer. This worked very well and was highly effective, but for some strange reason, it seems they didn't want to do that in the new movie.

Finally, in the old film, Arthur does make it back to London and tries to get back to his old life while hoping for his dear life that all the horrors are behind him. Of course they aren't. That terrible sense of overhanging doom is gone from the remake as Arthur never makes it back to London.

Add to it more unbelievable stuff like a very exaggerated psychic character and it was a worse movie overall. Still, it was entertaining and worth watching for horror movie buffs.


This one-dimensionality (as I call it) is a real plague in horror films these days. I get tired from people wanting me to be scared all the time. It's like if there's a children's birthday in a horror film these days, they set the mood in such a way that you'll think there's a killer clown hiding in the cake. Personally, I just get tired of it. A movie is more vibrant and believable if happy occasions are presented as happy and spooky as spooky and sad as sad, etc.
__________________
Something Completely Different

Last edited by Guybrush; 09-04-2012 at 07:51 AM.
Guybrush is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2012, 07:35 AM   #12199 (permalink)
Mate, Spawn & Die
 
Janszoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Rapping Community
Posts: 24,593
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scissorman View Post
I was promised this mind-blowing, completely new and original approach to the complete horror genre, but I ended up checking on imdb if it was the right movie. Sadly, it was.
I thought it was overrated too, I still liked it though. Definitely far from of a 0/10 for me, maybe a 6/10 or 7/10.
Janszoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2012, 07:49 AM   #12200 (permalink)
art is sold for money
 
Scissorman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Belgrade, Serbia
Posts: 730
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tore View Post
That does seem a bit exaggerated. I wouldn't call it a completely original approach as I think it uses all those tired clichès. It just does it in a very self-conscious and somewhat parodic way.

It's like calling Shaun of the Dead a completely original approach to the zombie genre. I don't think so - again all the clichès were there, it was just refreshingly humorous.

I can see how it could only disappoint if those were your expectations.
I'm not really sure if they were going for humorous... I couldn't tell if they were seriously trying to make a horror or it was a parody. Didn't feel like a parody.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Janszoon View Post
I thought it was overrated too, I still liked it though. Definitely far from of a 0/10 for me, maybe a 6/10 or 7/10.
I guess I just had really high expectations.
Scissorman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.