I check all the threads I've posted in if they pop up when I click "Today's Posts". I didn't even intend to become a troll on the European Football Thread but I posted in it once and so I kept checking it out for no reason and one thing lead to another.

You're the only one posting dissertations about comedians to respond to, really. Most of us are just posting clips. That's because REAL comedy fans don't try to deconstruct comedians because it tends to lessen the humour in the process.

https://i.imgur.com/getq5Pa.jpg

Then I'll explain: vindictiveness drove the content of his jokes that he meant to be funny. Two non-conflicting concepts existing in harmony.

Your original statement was "Ja being childishly vindictive in the face of barely any criticism is hilarious."

This suggests the primary goal was being vindictive not funny.

Now you're saying it's both. Quit back peddling.

*not winning argument*

*scours previous posts for weakness*

Let me refer you to one of the first posts that I made the first time we chased this dog tail

The only reason you think this is backpedaling is because of the false dilemma that you proposed.

nigga pls

I explained what I found brilliant about his special cause I felt like it and cause I actually like the special

If you have nothing but clips to add then do you... I mean that's REAL

once again we're back where we started

No, vindictiveness (defined by Google as as strong or unreasoning need for revenge) didn't drive those jokes at all

To the extent that he "responded" to the backlash it was by not deciding to avoid certain topics altogether to avoid controversy. He said nothing hateful, nothing mean spirited, nothing bent on revenge

uhh.. wasn't that from the argument we had months ago, before you said anything about him being vindictive?

actually I since that was just tonight I remembered that one off the top

"You're breaking internet argument rules so I'm right by default."

Christ..