Music Banter

Music Banter (https://www.musicbanter.com/)
-   Members Journal (https://www.musicbanter.com/members-journal/)
-   -   A Nice Guy's Music Musings (https://www.musicbanter.com/members-journal/57607-nice-guys-music-musings.html)

TheNiceGuy 07-17-2011 04:37 AM

A Nice Guy's Music Musings
 
I thought I might have a go at doing some reviews, so I think this is a good place to start. For my ratings of albums I'm going to use George Starosin's system, which works pretty well imo. Here is a link if you wish to find out how it works The Ratings System. Please don't hesitate to comment if you wish! :thumb:

edit: Not using the actual band rating system he has but instead I'm just doing a straight score out of 15.
For a guide: 15=Best of the Best
13-14=Very Good/Excellent
10-12=Average-Good
7-9=Below Average-Fair
5-6=Poor
<5=Bad

Trollheart 07-17-2011 01:31 PM

Hmmm, he said. A bit overcomplicated if you ask me. I used to use a four or five-stage rating system too, but I would score each indivdual track out of a total of 100, then divide the albums up into things like Content, Writing Skill, Musical Expertise, Enjoyment and so forth, and score them all out of 20, add the two scores thus giving me an overall album score (you can see some of this at work on my website at Lestat's Asia Website), but even that was a little over-analysing things, I felt.

These days I don't give scores, just talk about the album and let people score it if they want to. After all, like yer man says, you could rate an album really highly whereas someone else would not do so. I do have one question about his system though: the "band rating" he talks about. Surely that means you need to have heard all or most of a band's output in order to rate them? There are many artistes of whose work I've only heard one or two albums, and some I would not wish to hear more. Does that system he uses then not mean you have to be either a) very very old to have heard all these bands' full catalogue, b) very very rich, to be able to buy all their albums (or find somewhere you can download them!) and c) have a hell of a lot of time to compare and make judgements?

I personally don't like his system --- where does he get off, saying the Eagles' best album was their first? --- but I will be interested to see how your own reviews go.

Welcome to the Music Journals anyway!

TH
:wave:

TheNiceGuy 07-18-2011 01:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trollheart (Post 1086030)
Hmmm, he said. A bit overcomplicated if you ask me. I used to use a four or five-stage rating system too, but I would score each indivdual track out of a total of 100, then divide the albums up into things like Content, Writing Skill, Musical Expertise, Enjoyment and so forth, and score them all out of 20, add the two scores thus giving me an overall album score (you can see some of this at work on my website at Lestat's Asia Website), but even that was a little over-analysing things, I felt.

These days I don't give scores, just talk about the album and let people score it if they want to. After all, like yer man says, you could rate an album really highly whereas someone else would not do so. I do have one question about his system though: the "band rating" he talks about. Surely that means you need to have heard all or most of a band's output in order to rate them? There are many artistes of whose work I've only heard one or two albums, and some I would not wish to hear more. Does that system he uses then not mean you have to be either a) very very old to have heard all these bands' full catalogue, b) very very rich, to be able to buy all their albums (or find somewhere you can download them!) and c) have a hell of a lot of time to compare and make judgements?

I personally don't like his system --- where does he get off, saying the Eagles' best album was their first? --- but I will be interested to see how your own reviews go.

Welcome to the Music Journals anyway!

TH
:wave:

Yeah he usually reviews a bands whole catalogue. I actually forgot about this when posting the thread. The system is quite complicated I agree but I don't think giving an album a rating out of 10 shows the true range of quality that we can get in the music, for example.

I think I'll scrap his band rating system for here but I'll take a leaf out of his book and make the ratings all out of 15. I think this gives a reasonable spectrum to show the music's quality, but it also allows me to not be too worried about doing every single album from a particular artist/band.

starrynight 07-18-2011 02:51 AM

I think you do need time to hear enough music to make judgements that are more than just liking or disliking a particular genre. I'm not sure you need to hear a group's whole discography though, just compare it to similar music from other people you have heard.

Trollheart 07-18-2011 01:10 PM

I agree with that sentiment. In fact, as I just proved with my review of It Bites' "Once around the world", sometimes just one album can be great and the rest either dross or just not of as high quality, so in some ways, going through a whole band's discog could in fact lessen your appreciation of them. Not always, of course, but it just proves there are after all no hard and fast rules when it comes to music.

That said, as a youngster many (many!) moons ago, once I discovered a new artist I usually (providing I liked them, of course!) went out and bought the rest of their catalogue. So it was with Bob Seger, Springsteen and Judie Tzuke, to name but a few.

Another good way to get an idea of an artiste, I always found, was to get a live album. These days of course, it's all Youtube and Myspace, wasn't like this in my day, had to work for a living, blah blah blahzzzzzzzzz...... :)

TheNiceGuy 07-18-2011 03:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by starrynight (Post 1086262)
I think you do need time to hear enough music to make judgements that are more than just liking or disliking a particular genre. I'm not sure you need to hear a group's whole discography though, just compare it to similar music from other people you have heard.

Yeah that does make sense. I don't think I could really get through a whole bands catalogue unless I really liked them.

TheNiceGuy 09-03-2011 03:26 AM

Finally got around to my first review!

The Smiths-The Queen is Dead

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/...500_AA300_.jpg

Track Listing: 1. The Queen is Dead (Take Me Back to Dear old Blighty) 2. Frankly Mr Shankly 3. I Know it's Over 4. Never Had No One Ever 5. Cemetry Gates 6. Bigmouth Strikes Again 7. The Boy With A Thorn in his Side 8. Vicar in a Tutu 9. There is a Light That Never Goes Out 10. Some Girls Are Bigger Than Others

Best Track: I Know It's Over or Cemetry Gates

Starting off with such a well regarded album was nice, but on first listen The Queen is Dead disappointed me a little. It seemed decent but at times muddled (Especially on the title track) indie pop/rock that seemed a bit bland as well. Everything seemed to be focused on Marr's guitarwork and it all seemed very one dimensional.

However on my second and later third listen the real quality shone through. Whilst the title track still felt very muddled and undefined in it's sound, the rest of the album started to pick up. The quaint but attractive melodies in Frankly and Cemetry Gates really caught my ear this time around. Perhaps it's that delicate sound that doesn't quite get picked up when your expecting a harder edged sound. Yes I'll admit never having never heard The Smiths before I had some preconceived ideas in my mind that they would rock a little harder, but it's all for the better that they didn't.

Morrissey really shows me why he's so well regarded for his beautiful and emotional singing delivery, as well as his sharp and witty but at the same time sombre lyrics. The best example is in I Know It's Over, with his depressed beauty shining through in his voice, and of course the lyrics (Oh Mother, I can feel the soil falling over my heaaaaddd....). His lovely vocal delivery is evident throughout, and he makes it all bond well with Marr's dominant yet again melodic guitar parts. Whilst the bass and drum influence feels more in the background, it's still solid enough I guess. To be honest with the excellent use of the guitar on, for example, Boy with a Thorn and Some Girls are Bigger Than Others it makes up for the lack of variation in the rhythm section.

If anything this album proves to me that multiple listens are needed before making judgements. With only two tracks that aren't superb (Title track and Vicar in a Tutu), it has to be a given a 13 or 14. I'll be generous and give it a low 14, really due to the dual strength of Morrissey and Marr.

EDIT: In hindsight 14 was a bit too good for the album, so I'm pulling it down a notch to a still respectable 13.

13/15

Trollheart 09-03-2011 05:29 PM

Interesting review. I often wish I could review albums that succinctly, but I tend to ramble on and run off at the mouth (or at least, the keyboard), so my reviews tend to be much longer. Often they're probably too long, but whaddya gonna do? Everyone has their own style, I guess.

Never been a fan of the Smiths. Just never been into that sort of music, but it's a good review. Just one suggestion: when I list the tracks on an album I always do them one under another, as that way you can see clearly the titles, whereas when they're in a line it may be a little hard to distinguish one from the other. Just an observation, that's all.

I'm also impressed by your contention that you need to listen to albums more than once to appreciate them. That's certainly true. I have albums here I've reviewed while listening to them for the first time, and I wonder if my opinion would change (on the ones I say I don't like) over time and repeated listenings? Thing is, I usually have just about enough time to listen to an album once, never mind several times, so unless I already know it well it may not get the review it perhaps deserves. Food for thought, indeed.

Good first effort. I'll be watching for your next review eagerly.
Keep it up!
Trollheart

TheNiceGuy 09-05-2011 04:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trollheart (Post 1100744)
Interesting review. I often wish I could review albums that succinctly, but I tend to ramble on and run off at the mouth (or at least, the keyboard), so my reviews tend to be much longer. Often they're probably too long, but whaddya gonna do? Everyone has their own style, I guess.

Never been a fan of the Smiths. Just never been into that sort of music, but it's a good review. Just one suggestion: when I list the tracks on an album I always do them one under another, as that way you can see clearly the titles, whereas when they're in a line it may be a little hard to distinguish one from the other. Just an observation, that's all.

I'm also impressed by your contention that you need to listen to albums more than once to appreciate them. That's certainly true. I have albums here I've reviewed while listening to them for the first time, and I wonder if my opinion would change (on the ones I say I don't like) over time and repeated listenings? Thing is, I usually have just about enough time to listen to an album once, never mind several times, so unless I already know it well it may not get the review it perhaps deserves. Food for thought, indeed.

Good first effort. I'll be watching for your next review eagerly.
Keep it up!
Trollheart

Thanks! I actually rushed this review a little but to be honest it's not a huge album really so it didn't really have to be to long. As for the track listing I'll try your way for the next review to see how it turns out.

I've often found that certain albums (generally quieter, mellower ones) really don't stand out that much on first listen compared to more upfront sounding albums. Anyway I usually give at least 2 listens to an album, unless of course it's absolute bollocks when I won't bother with the 2nd listen or on the other hand if I really enjoy it then I'll probably give it a few more listens.

Edit: 100 posts!

TheNiceGuy 09-17-2011 11:08 PM

Pink Floyd-A Momentary Lapse of Reason

http://www.progarchives.com/progress...3151082009.jpg

Track Listing:
1. Signs of Life
2. Learning to Fly
3. The Dogs of War
4. One Slip
5. On the Turning Away
6. Yet Another Movie
7. A New Machine pt. 1
8. Terminal Frost
9. A New Machine pt. 2
10. Sorrow

Best Track: Learning to Fly

Well it's no Dark Side but it doesn't deserve it's bad rep either...

Pink Floyd seemed finished after the effectively Waters solo record that was The Final Cut, but instead Gilmour, Mason and to an extent Wright restarted Floyd to make Momentary Lapse. Considered by many Floyd fans to be horrid and an insult to the great Pink Floyd catalogue, this album tends to get a pretty bad wrap. But to be honest does it really deserve this criticism?

The first song is the instrumental Signs of Life. It opens with the flowing water at the start which then leads on to an ambient-ish synth part before ending in a subdued Gilmour guitar part. Quite a pleasant song, but probably not the best to open an album with. It's just a bit too unremarkable. Ideally you'd want the next song, Learning to Fly, to start off proceedings. Learning immediately hits with it's soaring slashes of guitar, which add to the effective and strong lyrics.

One thing about Momentary Lapse is that the record has energy with it. Even though The Dogs of War and One Slip aren't the best songs here at least they don't get bogged down. Dogs of War shows Gilmour trying to be all angry and demonstrative but really only Waters was ever good at that. On the Turning Away is another anthem like Learning to Fly, but it lacks the guitar slashes that predominate latter. It instead relies on effective backing vocals which background Gilmours airy voice beautifully.

The worst songs on the album are the double whammy of A New Machine pt 1 and 2. The sound is harsh, too sudden and ugly, with the empty gaps between Gilmour's shrieks awkward and pretty useless. I'm not sure whether Gilmour and co. trying to revive the gritty atmosphere of Animals here but if they were they failed dramatically. And then just to rub salt into the wound (or ears rather?) they decide to just repeat about 40 seconds of it a second time. Not smart, not smart at all...

Mind you in between the two abominations there is the (second) lovely instrumental, Terminal Frost. Starting off with a nice piano line, assumedly from Wright, and a bit more soaring guitar from Gilmour, the instrumental then morphs into a superb saxophone solo. Truly brilliant, the sax solo is moving but not wanky like you sometimes get with solo's from this instrument. It's very close to best track here, which is rare as generally I consider most instrumentals filler to the vocal tracks (unles of course the artist goes by the name of Brian Eno ;))

So certainly by no means a bad album. Granted there a few poor tracks and only one two true good ones but there really is no real problems here. It gave back Pink Floyd energy in their music as well as a bit more positivity after three generally dark albums. Certainly if you enjoyed stuff before Waters became too dominant then you shouldn't find this a bad album.

11/15

Trollheart 09-18-2011 09:57 AM

Hey, nice to see you review an album I can appreciate!
I almost did this myself, but ended up going with "The division bell" instead.
I actually like this album. I agree "Final cut" was more "Roger Waters and Pink Floyd" than an actual Floyd album, but this doesn't have any Waters influences on it at all really, and yet still stands (to me) as a good Floyd album.

I would disagree about your impressions of "A new machine". I think it's chilling and scary, different and stands out from the rest of the album, and I love the idea of someone "living behind your eyes" and never being able to live themselves. Not entirely sure what it's about, of course, but I do like it.

I also think "Dogs of war" is a great track, but I would put "On the turning away" more in the bracket of "The tide is turning" or "Two suns in the sunset" than "Learning to fly". I like the opening theme too, the idea of someone rowing out to, or in from, somewhere, and the funny little radio-like noises over everything. I also think "Yet another movie" is a great track.

There was always going to be some controversy about the first album sans Waters, as there was with Marillion after Fish left, Genesis after Gabriel, or any other band where the main creative driving force leaves. But I think Floyd pulled it out of the bag with this one. Not by any means a fantastic album, but they didn't collapse without Waters to lean on. I thought "Division bell" showed them really maturing without him, coming out of his shadow as it were, and Gilmour was able, on both albums, to show what a fine singer he is, in addition to the superb guitarist we know him to be.

Good review!
:thumb:

TheNiceGuy 10-06-2011 02:39 AM

The Jam-All Mod Cons

http://www.games-engine.com/upfiles/mp3/P231_1.jpg

Track Listing:
1. All Mod Cons
2. To Be Someone (Didn't We Have a Nice Time?)
3. Mr. Clean
4. David Watts
5. English Rose
6. In The Crowd
7. Billy Hunt
8. It's Too Bad
9. Fly
10. The Place I Love
11. 'A' Bomb In Wardour Street
12. Down In The Tube Station At Midnight

Best Track: It's Too Bad

My Generation,circa 1978?



I'd never heard of The Jam until two weeks ago, when I decided to take the plunge on them when I saw one of their cds. This was All Mod Cons, which is a superb if a little derivative art-punk album.

The sound on this album is pretty standard for the Punk era; being guitar, bass and drums but that doesn't stop the individual tracks from being quality. The title track opener sets the scene for the majority of the album with it's gritty yet melodic guitar riffs, it's effective bass lines and Paul Weller's harsh and heavily accented vocals. I really do like Weller's vocal style, as it has that punk angryness in it but yet it also conveys a very attractive essence to it, which I find uncommon for vocalists of this era.

This album seems to have taken a lot of cues from The Who's My Generation. Certainly it combines the art punk style of My Gen whilst it also has srtikingly similar vocal harmonies. It's Too Bad sounds beautiful because of these harmonies, which seem to have been inspired by The Kids Are Alright. Down In The Tube Station also uses these harmonies to good use, but the real good stuff here is on the smart guitar riffs that blend in so well with Weller's literal and immediate lyrics that he sings in a quick and decisive style. Add a few typical "Tube" sounds and you get the best description of a late night bashing that you'll ever get.

Just too balance out the general feel of the album there is the touching English Rose. One would think it's acoustic guitar and quite sweet love lyrics would make the song stick out like a sore thumb, but the song is sung with a sincere enough feel to keep it tasteful. Certainly it feels like an island of tranquility in the sea of kitchen sink style (not quality ;)) lyrics and a largely non acoustic sound. David Watts is a nice Kinks cover that continues the My Generation era feel that parallels the more modern punk elements that are also present in the music. And The Jam certainly manage to combine the two rather nicely with no obvious real faults. Perhaps Weller's vocals can get a touch too gritty in songs like To Be Someone, but other than that there's not much wrong here.

The Jam have made a brilliant album that manages to combine the musical spirit of two eras, which is certainly a step up from most other punk albums in the era (even though this wasn't straight out punk). Certainly one to lend your ear to.

14/15

Trollheart 10-06-2011 02:07 PM

Not a band I ever was into (my brother was), I'm still surprised you've never even HEARD of the Jam up to now? No "Town called malice?" No "Going underground?" No "Start"? Weird. You must be very young (or in residence under a rock) :) not to have heard of them, as they were pretty huge in the late 70s/early 80s, and of course Weller went on to fashion his own solo career with the Style Counsel.

FYI, the Jam weren't thought of as punk at the time of their success, they were known mostly as a "mod" band, and in fact pretty much carried the mod scene.

Good review again; nice to see you expanding your musical horizons (says he, preparing to enter the dark and murky world of boybands --- brrr!) :bringit:

TheNiceGuy 10-07-2011 12:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trollheart (Post 1109349)
Not a band I ever was into (my brother was), I'm still surprised you've never even HEARD of the Jam up to now? No "Town called malice?" No "Going underground?" No "Start"? Weird. You must be very young (or in residence under a rock) :) not to have heard of them, as they were pretty huge in the late 70s/early 80s, and of course Weller went on to fashion his own solo career with the Style Counsel.

FYI, the Jam weren't thought of as punk at the time of their success, they were known mostly as a "mod" band, and in fact pretty much carried the mod scene.

Good review again; nice to see you expanding your musical horizons (says he, preparing to enter the dark and murky world of boybands --- brrr!) :bringit:

Well I'm not too young... ;)

I'm in Australia and there are a number of British bands that don't get a hell of a lot of exposure here. Mind you I have heard of The Style Council before but that was only because of one of my friend's owning a Greatest Hits album of them.

As for the Mod vs. Punk image you're quite right in retrospect. Certainly it makes a lot of sense considering the similarities to My Generation, which showed The Who at the peak of their mod style. I guess the punk tag is more from a time period point of view rather than an accurate description of their sound.

And you're a brave person to be tackling boy bands that's for sure!

TheNiceGuy 11-13-2011 02:53 AM

Peter Gabriel-Peter Gabriel 3-Melt (1980)

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-OIPc9Ybb9e...er_Gabriel.jpg

Track List:
1. Intruder
2. No Self Control
3. Start
4. I Don't Remember
5. Family Snapshot
6. And Through The Wire
7. Games Without Frontiers
8. Not One of Us
9. Lead A Normal Life
10. Biko

Best Track: And Through The Wire

****ed up and disturbing...But I like it!

Peter Gabriel is one of the most gifted Art Rockers around because he can combine his arty experimentation with a sound that is appealing to the mainstream. (At least pre-1986) With PG 3 or Melt as I like to call it he manages to combine the two beautifully.

Intruder sets the scene of the album from the start. A disturbing synth background gives Gabriel plenty of room to sing in a very awkward and approiate style, which fits in brilliantly. The lyrics perfectly describe what happens in the head of an intruder, and it just comes out so nicely. It's not what I'd call immediately accessible but it's a strong starter. No Self Control continues to touch on the mentally unstable feel of the album, but Start is a massive left turn. Lovely luscious sax dominated instrumentals? Is this Roxy Music's Avalon? This is definitely a very distinct song from the other tracks and it does represent a nice breather from the heavier (in lyrics and feel) songs around it.

The next few songs feel a touch more listenable for the more mainstream person. I Don't Remember has a strong and heavy vocal hook which interchanges nicely the guitar there, whilst Family Snapshot touches on the heartstrings with Gabriel incorporating a childish touch to his voice at the end when he's singing to stop his parents fighting. The character impersonating stuff is a throwback to his Genesis years but it certainly sounds a lot more emotional and serious here. Which in a sense is a good description of the whole album.

And Through The Wire is next, and it shows Gabriel uses voice to good extent again, with a nice very 80's sounding but also quite good guitar riff dominating around it. This combination makes it my favourite song here. The hit single Games Without Frontiers has strong anti-war lyrical content but isn't quite as atmospheric as the other tracks. Not One of Us is similar in musical style to I Don't Remember without quite as strong a hook. Lead A Normal Life has a very thick and effective atmosphere, with nice piano work just floating to the surface over it. It almost has an ambient feel at times, except towards the end where there is a flood of distortion again returning to the mentally unstable style again. Biko is another political song (about some South African anti-apartheid campaigner I believe?) with excellent use of African drums and choir. Gabriel is a big campaigner for World music and it is represented nicely here, even if it kind of sticks out from the majority of the album. It is still a quality song.

From the striking album cover to the striking songs Melt represents art rock at it's finest. Rarely had Gabriel ever reached this kind of brilliance, in or out of Genesis, and so it certainly deserves praise.


14/15

Trollheart 11-13-2011 12:25 PM

Oh yes, another one I can comment on! Lovely! So many of the guys around here review albums I wouldn't have a clue about, with band names like Panthers Drowning In Jam or My Second Bicycle, that it's nice to see someone else getting involved with the music I appreciate.

Been a Gabriel fan since Genesis days, and although this album is one of his better ones, I personally rate "Ovo" as him reaching his creative peak --- although I'm shortly about to listen to "New blood", and by all accounts that takes things to a new level: Gabriel and orchestra? Sounds like a match made in Heaven! I'll let you (and everyone else) know what I think once I've had time to absorb it.

As far as this one goes, I agree with about everything you say, other than the choice of favourite track. Not sure what mine would be, maybe "Lead a normal life", if only for its total simplicity and yet deep symbolism: come on! A song with all that music and only ONE lyrical passage? A few lines? What a classic!

"Family snapshot" I always took to be about Lee Harvey Oswald, tracing back his youth and the troubles that (are seen to) assail him and cause him to assassinate President Kennedy. Like where he says "The governor's car is not far behind/ He's not the one I have in mind/ Cos there he is, the man of the hour..." I love also the way it starts so slow, builds to a ferocious intensity, drops off a cliff via piano and then comes back full circle.

"Biko" is indeed about a South African legend, Steven Biko. Watch the movie "Cry freedom" if you want to know more about this guy. I also love "Not one of us" for its frenetic style, as well as "No self control", the way it goes, well, out of control near the end. I see it, "Lead a normal life" and maybe "I don't remember" as being kind of a trilogy, tracing the progression of a man's madness, his treatment and perhaps release after that treatment. Probably totally wrong, wouldn't be the first time!

It's true though: from the unsettling drum intro of "Intruder" to the fading, plaintive African chant of "Biko", this is an album with no flaws. His last "real" album, "Up", was a huge disappointment to me, so I'm expecting big things from "New blood".

Great review, but I would have included a few YouTubes? Like these




And you need to get your [font] brackets sorted. Pedant, pedant, I know...

;)

TheNiceGuy 11-14-2011 12:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trollheart (Post 1119129)
Oh yes, another one I can comment on! Lovely! So many of the guys around here review albums I wouldn't have a clue about, with band names like Panthers Drowning In Jam or My Second Bicycle, that it's nice to see someone else getting involved with the music I appreciate.

Been a Gabriel fan since Genesis days, and although this album is one of his better ones, I personally rate "Ovo" as him reaching his creative peak --- although I'm shortly about to listen to "New blood", and by all accounts that takes things to a new level: Gabriel and orchestra? Sounds like a match made in Heaven! I'll let you (and everyone else) know what I think once I've had time to absorb it.

As far as this one goes, I agree with about everything you say, other than the choice of favourite track. Not sure what mine would be, maybe "Lead a normal life", if only for its total simplicity and yet deep symbolism: come on! A song with all that music and only ONE lyrical passage? A few lines? What a classic!

"Family snapshot" I always took to be about Lee Harvey Oswald, tracing back his youth and the troubles that (are seen to) assail him and cause him to assassinate President Kennedy. Like where he says "The governor's car is not far behind/ He's not the one I have in mind/ Cos there he is, the man of the hour..." I love also the way it starts so slow, builds to a ferocious intensity, drops off a cliff via piano and then comes back full circle.

"Biko" is indeed about a South African legend, Steven Biko. Watch the movie "Cry freedom" if you want to know more about this guy. I also love "Not one of us" for its frenetic style, as well as "No self control", the way it goes, well, out of control near the end. I see it, "Lead a normal life" and maybe "I don't remember" as being kind of a trilogy, tracing the progression of a man's madness, his treatment and perhaps release after that treatment. Probably totally wrong, wouldn't be the first time!

It's true though: from the unsettling drum intro of "Intruder" to the fading, plaintive African chant of "Biko", this is an album with no flaws. His last "real" album, "Up", was a huge disappointment to me, so I'm expecting big things from "New blood".

Great review, but I would have included a few YouTubes? Like these




And you need to get your [font] brackets sorted. Pedant, pedant, I know...

;)

As for the font sizes I always seem to forget what size I had my previous ones on! I probably need to focus a little on the editing afterwards with the reviews.

As for the Family Snapshot interpretation I must admit I never thought of it that way! Guess Pete's snuck in another little political song here under my nose... :)

TheNiceGuy 11-23-2011 01:21 AM

Radiohead-Pablo Honey

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-mX_vq6MVmH...ablo-honey.jpg

Track Listing:
1. You
2. Creep
3. How Do You?
4. Stop Whispering
5. Thinking About You
6. Anyone Can Play Guitar
7. Ripcord
8. Vegetable
9. Prove Yourself
10. I Can't
11. Lurgee
12. Blow Out

Best Track: Creep

Anyone can play guitar apparently, but can THEY play it well...

It's very easy to look at Radiohead's debut album through modern (2011) eyes and think it looks pretty unremakable. Obviously Pablo Honey lacks the arty-experimental rock of the later albums but Thom Yorke and co. do produce quite a decent debut.

You starts off proceedings in a honest fashion, with some slightly heavy but not too heavy guitar-work dominating. Yorke's vocals blend in alright with this playing. Radiohead's first hit Creep is one of the highlights on the album, with the self loathing lyrics really biting down hard. The swearing fits in well with that idea, without coming out as just braindead songwriting ala The Sex Pistols. There is a grungey feel here as well with the quiet-ish verses before the harder chorus. And then appears that falsetto in the middle which, while not as good as what Yorke will do on later albums, is still quite effective. It forms a nice contrast to his singing earlier in the song. How Do You feels very punk (Maybe they were like The Sex Pistols...) but has a slightly depressed note to it at the same time. The start is good but the heavy distortion at the end seems a bit of a pointless and not very pleasing way to end proceedings.

Stop Whispering is weird for the band in that it has a lyrics that make you want to stand up for yourself, instead of wallowing in depression. The drumming here from Selway is quite good as it provides a nice framework for Yorke to deliver a strong hook (Stop whispeeerriinngg...) and the three guitar attack to riff hard. Thinking About You is a very Smiths-like semi acoustic love song, whilst Anyone Can Play Guitar echoes The Smith's melancholic style without Morrissey's emotional delivery. Yorke has a good crack but the hooks here aren't quite as well delivered as the earlier songs. Ripcord again displays Selways good drumrolls but the vocals get drowned out by the just slightly too heavy guitars. And there doesn't seem to be that quiet-loud grungey dynamics that there were on Creep and Stop Whispering. Vegetable addresses this deficiency and has a nice twisted distortion guitar sound over quite strong lyrics that aren't referring to your regular garden greens.

Grungey distorted guitars continue to be the word of the day with Prove Yourself, and I Can't features an attractive slightly choppy guitar based melody that hang around a more subdued but still strong rhythm section. I Can't also taps into that well trodden teen insecuritys/angst theme to a good effect. It's probably a minute too long but that doesn't ruin the song. Lurgee is a touch unremarkable but not horrid. The finale Blow Out goes against the flow of the whole album with it's quite mellow overtones, before entering a siren like section that seems to point towards the sonic exploration of their early 2000's albums. The thumping drums underneath keep it from total white noise though.

Mixing The Smiths with the in style (Grunge) at the time is interesting, but the fact is Radiohead were never a band to hang around with only the limitations of Grunge, and every album after Pablo confirms this. However if you like you're Radiohead distorted guitar-heavy and angsty with a grungey flavour then Pablo fulfills that need. If you've just entered the world of Radiohead through this album however you've still got a long and throughly enjoyable ride to go. And yes, these guy's do know how to play guitar. ;)

11/15

TheNiceGuy 12-01-2011 05:00 PM

David Bowie-The Rise and Fall of Ziggy Stardust and The Spiders from Mars

http://rockoclock.files.wordpress.co...pg?w=300&h=300




Track Listing:

1. Five Years
2. Soul Love
3. Moonage Daydream
4. Starman
5. It Ain't Easy
6. Lady Stardust
7. Star
8. Hang on to Yourself
9. Ziggy Stardust
10. Suffragette City
11. Rock & Roll Suicide


Best Track: Ziggy Stardust, perhaps Starman



Glam Rock's only meaningful gift to society


Many consider this album to be Bowie's piece de resistance; honestly almost everyone does. At least everyone who only owns this and maybe a Bowie greatest hit collection, but the point still stands that this album represents Bowie's best quality album on the more commercial side of things. And commercial Bowie isn't bad at all, pre-1983 that is.

But Ziggy is certainly a very weird album. Which is bascially what you expect from Bowie. Anyway Five Years kicks things off, with a solid drumbeat and heavy piano chords backing through it. It's quite a lumbering song but Bowie's vocal style keeps it interesting. The story in this song and the whole album in general is a bit hard to follow at times, but it doesn't really matter too much. Everyone gets the general gist of it being the story of an alien rockstar who lives his famous life to the full (as in sex, drugs and rock'n'roll) and eventually dies a rockstar death at the end. Was Bowie trying to parody rockers like Hendrix and Jim Morrison? I'm not sure this was the original plan but hey it fits in.

Back to the songs; Soul Love is a nice acoustic twanger that gets a bit harder as it goes on. Moonage Daydream brings in some nice flute parts which gives the song a folky feel which harkens back to Bowie's 60's material. Starman is the big hit with it's flowing acoustic guitar melodies and a slightly funky bassline behind it in the verses, before hitting the string and hook filled chorus and then he hammers that down with a lovely electric guitar solo with more string backing. All this over Bowie's slightly quivering vocal stylings. Quality for you.

It Ain't Easy is a Led Zeppelin-esque rocker that doesn't quite hit the mark as Bowie lacks Robert Plant's vocal shriek. Lady Stardust makes up for it though; it's a lovely soulful piano ballad that is a lot more suited to Bowie. Star and Hang On To Yourself are both your a-typical glam rock songs but they are both listenable and catchy. It keeps the concept of the album going as it portrays Ziggy turning into that rockstar that he always was meant to be. Neither are that memorable though, but that's more to do with the excellent songs surrounding them rather than these two being bad.

Ziggy Stardust on the other hand is an album, hell, career highlight. The start sets the scene beautifully, with a heavy "sex, drugs and rock'n'roll" guitar riff before entering a chunky bassline that sets a base for Bowie's alien singing delivery. Like the song says this is Ziggy making love with his ego, and that boozy and sex-filled style bursts throughout the music and lyrics here. It almost seems like Ziggy is real! If only...

Suffragette City is a funky stomper that continues Ziggy's spiral into rock excess. His swansong, Rock & Roll Suicide, ends his life in a more settled and less uncontrollable style from the songs before it, and yet that makes it all the better. The "Your not alone" screeching (Assumedly from Ziggy to Lady Stardust but don't quote me on that) really closes up the emotional journey of his life strongly yet a touch poignantly at the same time. Bowie sure knew how to make this guy seem real, that's for sure.

Although the Musical Chameleon would move on from the glam era within only two albums or so, Ziggy Stardust still holds up as strong as ever. Certainly, Bowie would never be able to match the theatricality of this record for the rest of his career, and that just makes this album all the better.


14/15

Trollheart 12-02-2011 05:28 AM

Another great review guy! I actually covered this as part of my "70s week" a while back. To be honest, while I loved the album and always have, I too was at sea with the storyline, so I turned to my trusty friend Wiki, who filled in the blanks. Even then, it's a weird plot.

Interesting thing about this album (as mentioned in my review) is that for a long time Bowie got so caught up in the Ziggy character and lifestyle that at times he didn't know whether it was Bowie playing Ziggy or Ziggy playing Bowie, and it nearly destroyed him.

Wiki's always good for research, I find. Made my review of the album much more informative, both for me and the reader. Great review though considering you didn't resort to "the Oracle" for your information...

TH

TheNiceGuy 12-03-2011 03:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trollheart (Post 1126878)
Another great review guy! I actually covered this as part of my "70s week" a while back. To be honest, while I loved the album and always have, I too was at sea with the storyline, so I turned to my trusty friend Wiki, who filled in the blanks. Even then, it's a weird plot.

Interesting thing about this album (as mentioned in my review) is that for a long time Bowie got so caught up in the Ziggy character and lifestyle that at times he didn't know whether it was Bowie playing Ziggy or Ziggy playing Bowie, and it nearly destroyed him.

Wiki's always good for research, I find. Made my review of the album much more informative, both for me and the reader. Great review though considering you didn't resort to "the Oracle" for your information...

TH

I believe drugs may have played a part in that.

Salami 12-03-2011 01:07 PM

This is turning into a very good journal!

I think you were right in saying that "Games Without Frontiers" wasn't as atmospheric as the other tracks: the song was ruined by Kate Bush in my opinion. In fact I remember having a big argument with Il Duce over this. I also think that Peter Gabriel is a fantastic singer, and produces some intimate and personal songs. Sorry to bring it up again, but "Solsbury Hill" is a beautiful song, and definitely his best in my opinion.

Concerning "Pablo Honey", it is very easy to either succumb to the temptation of saying that it is great just because it is a Radiohead album (I would have!), or slate it because it sounds boring and unambitious. I think you walked the middle line very well.

Keep up the good work, I think that this is turning into an excellent set of reviews.

starrynight 12-03-2011 03:38 PM

I love Games without Fronties and the video for it is brilliant imo, brings out all the atmosphere and strangeness. Solsbury Hill is just a different kind of song, still excellent.

TheNiceGuy 12-04-2011 04:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mighty Salami (Post 1127390)
This is turning into a very good journal!

I think you were right in saying that "Games Without Frontiers" wasn't as atmospheric as the other tracks: the song was ruined by Kate Bush in my opinion. In fact I remember having a big argument with Il Duce over this. I also think that Peter Gabriel is a fantastic singer, and produces some intimate and personal songs. Sorry to bring it up again, but "Solsbury Hill" is a beautiful song, and definitely his best in my opinion.

Concerning "Pablo Honey", it is very easy to either succumb to the temptation of saying that it is great just because it is a Radiohead album (I would have!), or slate it because it sounds boring and unambitious. I think you walked the middle line very well.

Keep up the good work, I think that this is turning into an excellent set of reviews.

Solsbury Hill is certainly right up there in PG's catalogue.

TheNiceGuy 12-08-2011 04:37 AM

Blur-Modern Life is Rubbish (1993)

http://www.technodisco.net/img/track...is-rubbish.jpg

Track Listing:
1. For Tomorrow
2. Advert
3. Colin Zeal
4. Pressure on Julian
5. Star Shaped
6. Blue Jeans
7. Chemical World
8. Intermission
9. Sunday Sunday
10. Oily Water
11. Miss America
12. Villa Rosie
13. Coping
14. Turn It Up
15. Popscene
16. Resigned
17. Commercial Break
18. When The Cows Come Home
19. Peach


Best Track: For Tomorrow


90's Life is Rubbish more like...



The "Britpop" scene of the 90's almost felt like a backlash to the Grunge explosion at the start of that decade, and certainly revisiting the style of The Beatles (in the case of Oasis) and The Kinks/Jam (in the case of Blur) felt like a welcome contrast to the musical movement going on across the Atlantic. Modern Life is Rubbish really feels like the vanguard of the Britpop explosion, paving the way for both Blur and Oasis to release even huger albums.


Modern Life is undoubtably a subtle tip of the hat to The Kinks, especially their album The Village Green Preservation Society. Blur also added a touch of The Jam's attitude and blended it all into a 90's pop atmosphere. This mixture provides the album opener For Tomorrow with it's guitar pop buzz and it's chorus that's reminscent of the 60's. It's incredibly simple but it's also very addictive; who thought singing la-la-lala-la could make the centerpoint of a great song? Not me for one, but Albarn, Coxon, James and Rowntree certainly had the right idea.


Advert is punk meets The Kinks (ahem...The Jam?) and Colin Zeal is a slightly annoying but plausible attempt at creating a song like David Watts or Mr Clean. Pressure on Julian is a small improvement on that format with a nice swirling vocal hook from Albarn. (Pressure on Julliiiaaaaannn...) The stronger drumbeat on Star Shaped bangs down under Albarn's high pitched harmonies providing a solid combo that carries the song well. Blue Jeans has that very mellow 90's dreampop effect around it with something that sounds like an organ echoing below an easy and sweet acoustic guitar sound.


Chemical World describes the not-quite-perfect English suburban dream that Britpop was always so fond of. (The landlord said she's out in a week/What a shame she was just getting comfy) And then Coxon provides a guitar swirl that sounds like it's been chemically affected or something. Perhaps this is just a another subtle nod to their 60's influences (this one being psychedelia), but this feels original and fitting. Intermission is a bit of pointless filler that is still listenable with it's light piano before heading into a distorted guitar and bass cloud. Sunday Sunday has a pumping brassy funk about it while Oily Water has a choppy guitar and fuzzy bass interplay that gives me images of The Bends-era Radiohead, two years before they even released it! The whole song isn't completely satisfying; distorting Albarn's vocals doesn't come out very well and the guitar/bass interplay becomes a little bit tired as the song wears on. But it's not offensive in any way, which is kind of a signature sign of Britpop I guess. (And also one of it's greatest strengths)


The mellow, dreamy sound of Blue Jeans is touched on again in the song Miss America. The Blur boys seem to be giving across this high/stoned vibe with the lazy guitar flushes and light percussion, which works despite it kind of going agianst the theme of the album. Think of it as another tribute to the psychedelia of Barrett-era Pink Floyd and the like. In fact this song might have worked alright with Syd singing come to think of it... Villa Rosie has nice guitar spirals that turn into stronger riffing leading into Albarn's so English 'singalong' vocals. Coping has a punk throwback intro before moving into better suited guitar pop-rock. The shuddering synths provide a nice diversion to the guitar dominated sound, without totally blocking out the guitars. This time however, the "la la la la" outro trick isn't quite as melodic and attractive.


Turn It Up continues the Britpop formula, but it's a less memorable version compared to earlier tracks. Horns and grungey guitars are combined on Popscene to decent effect, but the horns feel wanky and overblown. They block out a nice keyboard melody below them which is a pity. Toning down the horns may have been the way to go, but you can't fault these guys to much for wanting to add a little diversity. Resigned is a laidback album closer that keeps the style of the album right to the end. And then of course there is the guitar workout of Commercial Break that probably should have been cut off from the album. The version that I have also includes the easy going English countryside funk of When The Cows Come Home and a peach of song, interestingly also called Peach! A relaxing 'early evening' synthy background surrounds Coxon's lassez faire guitar fuzz. To be honest, Peach is quite an excellent album finisher as well. It could of and should have easily found a spot on the album proper over the Commercial Break and Intermission ditties.


It's a bit too long, a bit too repetitive and a bit too British (That's not a bad thing) but ultimately Modern Life fills it's brief well. It's a pity that not many bands can make pop-rock like they did nowadays.


12/15

TheNiceGuy 12-16-2011 03:21 AM

Genesis-Invisible Touch (1986)

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_4Clghcrhrk...bleTouch86.jpg

Track Listing:
1. Invisible Touch
2. Tonight, Tonight, Tonight
3. Land of Confusion
4. In Too Deep
5. Anything She Does
6. Domino
7. Throwing It All Away
8. The Brazilian

Best Track: In Too Deep

Well it was "good" for 1986 at least...

Like most of the original wave of early 70's Prog bands Genesis started to change their sound to a more commercial and pop-rock orientated style as the 1980's went on. Although generally by doing this they become more commercially successful they also tended to make poorer quality records. Occasionaly one of these pop records would turn out alright (Yes with 90125 and Genesis itself with Genesis), but most of the time these albums turned out below average. Invisible Touch is one of these albums.

Good old Phil Collins, the once legendary drummer turned vocalist who recently started having a "successful" solo career pens the first track Invisible Touch. This isn't a highlight for Phil; calypso style synths over an oh so boring drumbeat make things bad to start with, but then the vocals come in and it turns to ****. Phil can sing but here his voice has a very sharp feel that doesn't sit well. Certainly the cheesy lyrics didn't help, but he wrote them so he has no real excuse. Tonight, Tonight, Tonight has a computer like synth bleeping that keeps on coming back and Phil's vocals are once again poor. Rutherford delivers a decent guitar riff towards the end but that's too little too late on a pop song that goes for 9 minutes.

Land of Confusion turns the tables quite well though. Here Rutherford gets plenty of work with more riffing over a beat like synth line from Banks that actually works. And Phil's vocals actually fit in well with the political anti-Thatcher-Gorbachev-Reagan theme. A far cry from the veiled metaphor dominated social commentary of Selling England By The Pound but they don't have Peter Gabriel now so I guess this is alright. In Too Deep shows some vocal subtlety from Phil which is pretty shocking compared to the first couple of songs. The atmospheric keys and subtle guitar ripples blend in well with the romantic feel. That lovely keyboard passage about 3 and half minutes can melt many a'stony heart or mind. It's an achievement at least, and it's the piece de resistance of the album.

Funky brass in Anything She Does breaks that subtle feel of the last song though. The brass almost reminds me of Sledgehammer from Peter Gabriel's 1986 album So, but Phil lacks Pete's ability to change pitch quickly. It's a pity that Pete had to leave Genesis; certainly putting him as vocalist and lyricist and letting Phil focus on his drumming would work well. Maybe sack Banks too; his synthy shrieks are can be really grating on the ears.

Domino is a 10 minute song that almost seems like a throwback to the Prog years on first glance, but in reality it's just another long synth dominated pop-rock meddle. Not all of it's bad; the part where Phil cooly recites his vocals through a synth cloud feels quite deep, but then the shrieky farts return and Phil loses his vocal calmness. This repeats a few times thoughout the song, with not a lot of variation which really make me lose interest in this song, despite the fact it isn't that bad. Throwing It Away is quite a nice pop ditty that comes out in quite a sincere manner from Phil. Rutherford does have a knack of writing quite lovely pop love ballads that aren't too saccharine ala Your Own Special Way, and this is another example of that school. Even Phil's cooing comes out well, which is a good thing I guess. You'd reckon that would be enough, but instead an ugly sounding instrumental called The Brazilian is tagged on at the end. The main synth melody of the song has a steamy (Brazilian?) style about it but most of the other synth parts are messy jerk offs that are really just poor quality padding. A pop-rock band doing instrumentals? Or an old Prog band trying to reconnect itself somewhat with it's glory days where mainstream success wasn't be all and end all?

The main saving grace of Invisible Touch is that despite the muddled synths and badly applied vocals on some of the tracks all of them are least listenable to an extent. There's nothing truly horrendous here, but Genesis would change that in the next few albums. And at least there are a smattering of good songs here. After all these guys still had some talent left after all didn't they?

8/15

Trollheart 12-16-2011 08:36 AM

"Invisible touch" is not one of my favourite Genesis albums, in fact sometimes I dub it "Invisible talent"! There are some good songs on it, but you're right in that it's really a continuation of the annoying pop sound they inflicted on us with the shocking "Abacab", which was so bad and such a shock to the system that I almost went entirely off Genesis. Luckily the follow up was miles better, and in fairness I was pleasantly surprised by "We can't dance", but then "Calling all stations" hammered in the nail into the coffin. Well, to be accurate about it, if I'm honest, "Abacab" pushed Genesis into the coffin, "Genesis" was their desperate attempt to get out of the box -- "We're not dead! Really we're not!" --- "Invisible touch" pushed them back down, hammered in some nails, "We can't dance had them banging on the inside of the lid (but no-one really heard them) and of course "Calling all stations" knocked in the final nails and allowed them to be lowered into the ground. You're dead now, guys!

For me, the last great Genesis album was "and then there were three", though "Duke" is a fine album too, but you could see the slow leanings towards pop with songs like "Misunderstanding" and "Turn it on again", not surprisingly the biggest hits on that album, and some of Genesis' biggest recent hit singles too.

I hated the pop sound of IT with a few exceptions: I like "Tonight, tonight, tonight" and "Domino/The last domino", and indeed "In too deep" is a great ballad, probably a result of Collins' by then successful solo career. But I must take issue with you over Tony Banks' keyboard style: sack him? Well, pointless now of course, but the guy virtually held the band together imo and he's a keyboard genius! Listen to his solo albums "A curious feeling" or "Seven: a suite for orchestra" and see if you disagree. Now Collins --- there's a man who almost single-handedly plotted (if subconsciously) and eventually achieved the fall of one of the mightiest prog bands the world has ever seen...

starrynight 12-16-2011 09:08 AM

I doubt I would like much of the Invisible touch album either, certainly from the songs I remember hearing. But it sounds like your preference is definitely progressive over pop. Some earlier solo songs he did I really quite liked: Against All Odds, One More Night, Take Me Home. Some progressive groups did become more pop over time, so did some punk groups, but it could be to memorable effect sometimes I think. By 85 quite a few British acts also seemed to want to get a bigger and more streamlined production sound to appeal to mainstream American radio even more. Often I don't think this worked out too well, OMD's later music for instance.

TheNiceGuy 12-16-2011 04:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trollheart (Post 1133294)
"Invisible touch" is not one of my favourite Genesis albums, in fact sometimes I dub it "Invisible talent"! There are some good songs on it, but you're right in that it's really a continuation of the annoying pop sound they inflicted on us with the shocking "Abacab", which was so bad and such a shock to the system that I almost went entirely off Genesis. Luckily the follow up was miles better, and in fairness I was pleasantly surprised by "We can't dance", but then "Calling all stations" hammered in the nail into the coffin. Well, to be accurate about it, if I'm honest, "Abacab" pushed Genesis into the coffin, "Genesis" was their desperate attempt to get out of the box -- "We're not dead! Really we're not!" --- "Invisible touch" pushed them back down, hammered in some nails, "We can't dance had them banging on the inside of the lid (but no-one really heard them) and of course "Calling all stations" knocked in the final nails and allowed them to be lowered into the ground. You're dead now, guys!

For me, the last great Genesis album was "and then there were three", though "Duke" is a fine album too, but you could see the slow leanings towards pop with songs like "Misunderstanding" and "Turn it on again", not surprisingly the biggest hits on that album, and some of Genesis' biggest recent hit singles too.

I hated the pop sound of IT with a few exceptions: I like "Tonight, tonight, tonight" and "Domino/The last domino", and indeed "In too deep" is a great ballad, probably a result of Collins' by then successful solo career. But I must take issue with you over Tony Banks' keyboard style: sack him? Well, pointless now of course, but the guy virtually held the band together imo and he's a keyboard genius! Listen to his solo albums "A curious feeling" or "Seven: a suite for orchestra" and see if you disagree. Now Collins --- there's a man who almost single-handedly plotted (if subconsciously) and eventually achieved the fall of one of the mightiest prog bands the world has ever seen...

I agree that Banks was quite a good keyboardist technically and certainly in the prog days he was a good songwriter as well. However a lot of that keyboard playing nous is wasted in the late Genesis albums as a lot of his synth work comes out badly. He was more of a prog keyboardist then a pop keyboardist in other words. Mind you his prog playing wasn't always great either; ala Wind and Wuthering.

I have nothing major against Phil honestly; he did a pretty good job as vocalist for what 16 years? And his drumming has always been to a high standard pre-1986. However my only real gripe with him at times is his songwriting which certainly strays a bit too far in to that 'adult contemporary' style which was a hallmark of his solo career. Sometimes it works (In Too Deep, Against All Odds) but this isn't often. BUT Phil isn't only to blame for the poor pop that came out at times for '80s Genesis. Banks was the dominant instrumentalist and he deserves some of the blame for it as well.

TheNiceGuy 12-16-2011 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by starrynight (Post 1133308)
I doubt I would like much of the Invisible touch album either, certainly from the songs I remember hearing. But it sounds like your preference is definitely progressive over pop. Some earlier solo songs he did I really quite liked: Against All Odds, One More Night, Take Me Home. Some progressive groups did become more pop over time, so did some punk groups, but it could be to memorable effect sometimes I think. By 85 quite a few British acts also seemed to want to get a bigger and more streamlined production sound to appeal to mainstream American radio even more. Often I don't think this worked out too well, OMD's later music for instance.

I do prefer the Prog Genesis days but I do like parts of their pop era as well.

Trollheart 12-16-2011 05:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheNiceGuy (Post 1133448)
He was more of a prog keyboardist then a pop keyboardist in other words. Mind you his prog playing wasn't always great either; ala Wind and Wuthering.

Oh no no no my friend! Wind and wuthering? The sublime keyboard passages in "Eleventh earl of Mar", not to mention the unbelievable solo and gentle piano intro in "One for the vine"? Surely you are thinking of another album? W&W features, in my opinion, some of Tony Banks' best and most thoughtful music. And I haven't even mentioned "Unquiet slumbers ... for the sleepers in that quiet earth". Well, now I have...


TheNiceGuy 12-17-2011 02:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trollheart (Post 1133489)
Oh no no no my friend! Wind and wuthering? The sublime keyboard passages in "Eleventh earl of Mar", not to mention the unbelievable solo and gentle piano intro in "One for the vine"? Surely you are thinking of another album? W&W features, in my opinion, some of Tony Banks' best and most thoughtful music. And I haven't even mentioned "Unquiet slumbers ... for the sleepers in that quiet earth". Well, now I have...


This is one of his better moments on the album; but to be honest Phils shaky sweet vocals are the highlight in One for the Vine for me!

His playing wasn't bad on Wind and Wuthering but in my eyes he did better with the earlier prog albums like Selling England and Foxtrot. Perhaps I was a little harsh on him but W&W isn't his best.

TheNiceGuy 12-20-2011 09:44 PM

Brian Eno-Another Green World (1975)

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_N0TSGcQUzg...en_World_b.jpg


Track Listing:
1. Sky Saw
2. Over Fire Island
3. St. Elmo's Fire
4. In Dark Trees
5. The Big Ship
6. I'll Come Running
7. Another Green World
8. Sombre Reptiles
9. Little Fishes
10. Golden Hours
11. Becalmed
12. Zawinul/Lava
13. Everything Merges With The Night
14. Spirits Drifting

Best Track: St Elmo's Fire

Ambient doesn't always have to be soporific


The one and only synth God Brian Eno shed a lot of his art/glam rock history with arguably the first ever ambient album. And for good measure he keeps enough pop-rock sensibility in it to keep the album interesting, as you shall see.

The opener Sky Saw is an enjoyable synth workout with an 'in you face' swinging synth immediately slashing against the listeners ears. As the song goes on more quieter synth melodies fizz beneath the main slashing but it combines nicely. This track isn't ambeint but it's a nice throwback to Eno's synth experimentation with Roxy Music. And of course he does more as this album goes on. Over Fire Island clunks along with a minimalist bass line that holds Eno's mad shaky synths from falling out of the song. St Elmo's Fire is in another league though, with Eno singing in a poetic and fairy tale like style that is so damn attractive to the ears (In the bluuuuueeee August mooooooon...) And then Eno's old pal Mr Robert Fripp delivers a flowing guitar solo that is so easy and relaxed contrasting with the rhythmic synths and gentle percussion like colours in a painting.

The percussion is used again on In Dark Trees, which is the first real exploration into the ambient style. But despite it's simplicity it is still rather interesting and not at all boring either. The Big Ship continues to proves that point, with an almost harsh organ like background underpinning the slow build of the song to a higher synth melody that just ripples over that organ. Eno reverts back to a nice pop ditty in I'll Come Running to change the atmosphere a little. The lyrics are also fairy tale like; not making a lot of sense but at the same time being very addictive and sweet sounding. Fripp delivers his second brilliant solo which rides nicely on Eno's piano wave. And then Eno harmonises his own voice in a lovely echoey "ohohohohohoh" over a poetic "I'll come running to tie your shoes" a number of times. Pop mastery in a nutshell.

Another Green World has a deceiving guitar like synth fuzz over it that keeps it interesting, whilst Sombre Reptiles has a scaley buzzing percussion that certainly fits that reptile theme. And who would have guessed it, it has a sombre tone. Not obvious at all, but the fact is it combines the relaxing elements of ambient music with enough interesting musical artiness to keep the listener on their toes. Little Fishes is yet another example of this with little synth swirls and an almost flute like synth wash behind the swirls. Golden Hours features Eno's echoey vocal harmonies again that gives it an almost creepy "late night" effect. Some more weird but so memorable lyrics (Perhaaappsss my brain has turned to sand.../Perhaps my brains are old and scrambled...) dominate before Fripp delivers a third sonic gift to us. A plucky piece of guitar noodling that sounds electronically treated becomes his third great solo. And then a little viola outro gets us on our way to the next song. Smart lad this Eno was.

Becalmed is the most "ambient" and purely calming track on the album (I wonder why...). This could put someone to sleep, but no not from boredom. Eno wouldn't allow that. No, he prefers lullabying people to sleep with his soothing synths that sound like they could have been strings but instead have drowned in a sea of electronic beauty. Some limpid piano I believe softly coo's the song to end. Zawinul/Lava's skinny intro of a slow piano melody and later synth droplets keep the listener close to falling asleep but a few delicate percussion flicks and soft synth wails keep the listener from totally losing conciousness. Everything Merges With The Night is the last pop rock song on the album presenting Eno singing in a reflective and almost mournful style. But it doesn't feel sad at all, no the sparkling synth and piano interplay keeps it in a reasonably calm but postive atmosphere. More synth waves keep coming with a few bass bumps keeping it from floating away on it's cloudlike lightness. Spirit's Drifting ends the album appropriately. This is the type of album where a low key and stylish ending is needed, and the song delivers with a slightly throbbing synth soundscape. Quiet but pleasant, the song casually fades way into Eno's synth night, ending the album well.

In terms of pure synth innovation this album would easily be highly rated. Add to the fact that it effectively started the whole ambient genre and that it had a small collection of synthy pop rock songs to boot, it's really hard not to give this album the highest rating. The only reason it gets a 14 is the fact that it could have done with one or two more of those pop songs like St Elmo's Fire and Golden Hours, which are the highlights of the album. The more ambient leaning material here is still quality though, and certainly this is a great album to start with when listening to Eno's solo records.

14/15 (God how many water comparisons did I make in that review...) ;)

starrynight 12-21-2011 01:13 PM

I'm sure there is some ambient sounding music (even in popular music) before Eno, but I suppose he popularised it. Best Eno album that I've heard is Before and After Science, though the uptempo tracks I liked less so I wouldn't say it was a classic.

TheNiceGuy 12-21-2011 06:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by starrynight (Post 1135458)
I'm sure there is some ambient sounding music (even in popular music) before Eno, but I suppose he popularised it. Best Eno album that I've heard is Before and After Science, though the uptempo tracks I liked less so I wouldn't say it was a classic.

I don't know a lot of ambient history but Eno seems to be the main father of the genre, even though some others had used ambient-esque sonic textures prior to his work.

TheNiceGuy 12-29-2011 05:49 AM

Roxy Music-Stranded (1973)

Moderator cut: image removed

Track List:

1. Street Life
2. Just Like You
3. Amazona
4. Psalm
5. Serenade
6. A Song For Europe
7. Mother of Pearl
8. Sunset


Best Track: A Song For Europe



Pure unadulterated style and class.


The departure of keyboardist and all round synth maestro Brian Eno from Roxy Music after their second album didn't affect the quality of the group too much. Bryan Ferry was always the leader and songwriter of the band and so Roxy Music only really lost some of Eno's chilly electronics from their future work however. This departure allowed Bryan to stretch his legs a bit more, and so the more stylish and cleaner album Stranded emerged.


The opener Street Life is the song that is the most similar to Roxy's previous two albums. It re-creates the spirit of Do The Strand and Re-make/Re-model with it's storm of harsh synth and strong guitar riffing from Phil Manzenera. The second track Just Like You changes the atmosphere completely and immediately. The lush piano ballad nature and Ferry's sweet vocal falsetto blend together seamlessly with it's slightly regretful themed lyrics. This is the best example of the quieter more pop-rock oriented side of Roxy.


Amazona decides to throw that out the door; Ferry swaps sweet for steamy in a another inspired example of his delicious vocal croon. The squelchy synths complete that Brazilian rainforest altmosphere, before Manzanera chucks in a searing squealing solo. Psalm keeps the eclectic nature of the record going with the song being of a religious nature. It is more or less a psalm, funnily enough. Now who could've guessed that? The song's mostly a vocal workout for Ferry but Eddie Jobson relays Eno's work as he creates a nice synth fuzz after one of Ferry's wails. A decent rocker comes after as the song Serenade, with Andy Mackay backing the heavier guitars and drums with his saxophone blurts.


The magnum opus of the album is the mournful A Song For Europe. The tone is downbeat and melancholic, echoing the work of Lou Reed's Berlin released a few months prior. But Ferry is a much better singer than Reed and it shows here; Ferry manages to croon in both English and French I believe in this song, keeping true to the song's European flavour. The piano work here is astounding and Mackay delivers another of his signature sax solo's to superb effect. Ferry's outro whistling seals the deal, a trick he would use again in a few years with the song Jealous Guy.


Mother of Pearl is a dangerous multi segmented song, beginning with a minute and a half of hard edged insane art rock, with Ferry literally going wild with him imitating a person's conscience at a party. Manzanera's answers with a quick and blistering solo before the song quickly takes a left turn, becoming a "post party" style piano ballad. Assumedly the "Mother of Pearl" is a prostitute, which makes Ferry's fading outro of "oh mother of pearl/I wouldn't trade you for another girl" all the more ironic considering his taste in women. (Just look at the album cover!) The final song Sunset is an effective song for letting off all the tension built up by the emotional extremes of the album. It's a touch mellow and a bit bland but it more or less fills it's brief of ending the album on a more subtle note.


With so much consistency throughout this record and of course it's stylish art rock leanings it would be hard to not give this a 15. In fact it probably would get one if Sunset and Psalm were perhaps two minutes shorter each, so that these two songs remained completely interesting throughout. But the fact is there are no bad songs here, and so Ferry, Manzenera, Mackay and co. will get themselves a high 14. And this isn't even Roxy's best album!


14/15

TheNiceGuy 01-06-2012 03:02 AM

The Kaiser Chiefs-Employment (2005)


http://lostinthelibrary.files.wordpr...employment.jpg



Track Listing:
1. Everyday I Love You Less and Less
2. I Predict a Riot
3. Modern Way
4. Na Na Na Naa
5. You Can Have It All
6. Oh My God
7. Born To Be Dancer
8. Saturday Night
9. What Did I Ever Give You?
10. Time Honoured Tradition
11. Caroline, Yes

Best Track: You Can Have It All


Oh my God, yet another British pop-rock group!


The Kaiser Chiefs represented an interesting combination when they appeared on the music scene in 2005. Their musical style was one of quite different styles; one part representing the tongue-in-cheek hook filled Britpop of Blur, another coming across as a throwback to the early punk days with aggressive fast songs with a third being the synth drenched New Wave of the early '80's. Combining these three styles into a cohesive record would not be easy, but neither impossible.

The threeway combo is immediately manifested in the jumpy opener Everyday I Love You Less And Less, with a synth riff hammering through a hook laden song that is easy to get caught replaying in your head over and over. The formula is repeated again in I Predict A Riot, with vocalist Ricky Wilson shouting out "I Predict a Riot" in a heady British drawl. Add a pint of typical English tongue-in-cheek humour and some great flicky drumming and you get an even more catchy song. Modern Way has lyrics that are a brilliant throwback to Blur's Modern Life is Rubbish with lyrics about escaping modern life and how it's affecting people's brains. This isn't an original lyrical idea, as of course they were emulating Blur who in turn emulated The Kinks, but the point still stands that the lyrics are well crafted and contain a solid balance of realist views on our comtemporary scene and a touch of dark humour. Sounds like a British sitcom to me!

Na Na Na Naa bursts out as a ball of pure musical fun. Firstly how could you not love that hook? So simple and easy but yet very addictive. Pump in a quick and loud solo from Andrew White and some flashy drums and you end up with something that the charts and the critics will love. You Can Have It All has a sweet synth opening from Baines who seems to be channeling his inner Yes (specifically their virtuoso keyboardist Rick Wakeman). The song has a happy rolling nature that counterpoints the more wild songs before it, with lovely Beatle-esque harmonies and soft chainsaw guitars. Their first single Oh My God is another humourous take on modern life with nice chorus with the bass, guitar and vocals all linking together perfectly to make a heavy almost metal like hook. The last chorus is great really fits this view, doing so in a way that is memorable and can also be headbanged to. Even for the non metalheads like myself!

Born To Be A Dancer is a poorer attempt at Everyday, with the hook being a bit cluttered and the guitar parts being a bit average. However it does have a nice synth line. Saturday Night is a disappointing attempt trying to be an American Pop-punk group. The verses are horrid, and the chorus isn't too much better. The guitar solo works nicely but it only goes for a short time meaning that it can't save the song. What Did I Ever Give You has a cool creepy keyboard riff that complements Wilson's vocals that remind me of Roger Waters during the verses for some strange reason. The pre chorus uses some echoey harmonies effectively which leads into the typical catchy pop rock chorus. And there's even a little organ flourish before the last chorus for any Ray Manzerak lovers out there. (Including me of course)

Time Honoured Tradition has an old fashioned music hall verse with a chorus being nothing but a collection of "oh ohs" and weird shrieks latching on to some good rhythm guitar playing and percussion. Caroline, Yes is a cheeky little Beach Boys reference but the song is still very British. Boozy synths and vocals that remind me of tired men at the pub (that have great harmonies.) A clashing keyboard and guitar musical standoff is the peak of the song, but the "wooo owooo owooo ooo" outro is a pretty touch to finish the song.

In short it's to hard to find many faults on Employment but occasionaly the punkier elements can get grating on the ears and ruin the song. All the same this album remains a funny and danceable indie pop-rock keeper that has enough melodies and hooks to keep you interested for ages.


13/15

TheNiceGuy 01-21-2012 03:02 AM

Mumford and Sons-Sigh No More (2009)

http://cdn.beatsperminute.com/wp-con...gh-No-More.jpg



Track Listing:
1. Sigh No More
2. The Cave
3. Winter Winds
4. Roll Away Your Stone
5. White Blank Page
6. I Gave You All
7. Little Lion Man
8. Timshel
9. Thistle & Weeds
10. Awake My Soul
11. Dust Bowl Dance
12. After The Storm


Best Track: The Cave


Folky insights blended with pop nous

Folk pop/rock has never really been my strongpoint in musical terms. Not because I dislike it as such more because I've never had that much time for it. The only real folk album in my collection is Van Morrison's Astral Weeks, which is considered to be one of the very best ever folk rock albums and to be honest I was a little underwhelmed by it. And so when all the hype about Mumford and Sons started picking up recently I was a little wary. Which is mostly why I've waited until now to review it.


The album opener and title track was a real splash of cold water in the face, if you'll excuse the metaphor. The song slowly builds up nicely with lead vocalist Marcus Mumford giving a nice roaring finish to the song. Starting off strong is good in my books, and The Cave continues this with a quiet acoustic guitar melody that counterpoints the rather strong uplifting lyrics, before the twangy banjo hits in to keep up that folk image. How could anyone not feel inspired and strong after that powerful final chorus, by the way? The Cave represents a good balance between the calm and the storm in musical terms. Winter Winds has a nice rolling banjo sound and a heavy and yet steady drumbeat, before the song peaks with a rollicking trumpet lead final chorus. It's enough to melt even the coldest hearted metalhead to enjoy this rural folk sound, and even the pop sensibilities of this record wouldn't put many people off as it has a very down to earth and rootsy style.


Roll Away Your Stone is your par-for-course folk-pop song, but White Blank Page starts off as a slow ballad with Mumford opting for an almost whiny tone to an ex lover, before the song starts to rise into a faster tempo interspaced with a Celtic sounding violin solo that reminds me of The Corrs. I Gave You All is quite a personal acoustic strummer that gives it an intimate style. The wonderful bass rolls of Little Lion Man underpin some great lyrics which uses swearing in a glamorous style that goes against the normal feeling of swearing in a song. The next song Timshel reminds me a lot of some of those later Pink Floyd acoustic ballads, without the darkness associated with the Floydians. Thistle and Weeds features some quality melancholic piano from Ben Lovett, which mixes nicely with the harsh vocal pleadings of Mumford ("IIIIII will hoooolllllldddd on!").


Awake My Soul's best feature is a brilliant vocal hook outro which makes attaches itself to the country banjo twang in a pleasant manner. Dust Bowl Dance is an interesting anomaly on this album in that it contains the hardest rocking part in the whole record. The song starts steadily, with soft piano chords and a little banjo, before the vocals go harsh and reasonate with religious overtones which makes it dark and brooding. And then the song bursts into raw chaos with pumping electric guitars, heavy piano chords, zooping bass and thumping metallic drums. Just before it starts to stick out too much, the storm of sound drops off back into the style of the intro. This Folk stuff isn't too bad then hey? The finale After the Storm fills it's brief to the letter; it represents an island of calm after the heavy storm of Dust Bowl Dance. The death fearing lyrics are quite fascinating, as they start off dark and scared before ending in an uplifting and life loving manner. For this album it represents an appropriate way to finish the record off.


And so yet again the hype that is given to bands that I have doubts about is well deserved. The pop sensibilites here keep it accessible and yet it sounds as if it was made in an English meadow such us it's natural and un-processed nature. My only hope is that Mumford & Sons can project this excellent album's quality in to future work, but I'm sure if they stay in that meadow they'll be alright.



13/15

Trollheart 01-21-2012 06:08 PM

Cool. I love making up words too. Zooping banjo? Excellent, as my new avatar would no doubt say. I like chingling myself. Hey, sometimes you just can't find the words, so make some up: who's gonna know, or care?

Great review, by the way...
:thumb:

TheNiceGuy 01-21-2012 10:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trollheart (Post 1144940)
Cool. I love making up words too. Zooping banjo? Excellent, as my new avatar would no doubt say. I like chingling myself. Hey, sometimes you just can't find the words, so make some up: who's gonna know, or care?

Great review, by the way...
:thumb:

Thankyou very much. As for "zooping" that's what I thought it actually sounded like! Onomatopeia is a wonderful thing sometimes...


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:43 AM.


© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.