Paul McCartney - The REAL King of Pop? - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Pop
Register Blogging Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-03-2011, 12:43 PM   #51 (permalink)
The Sexual Intellectual
 
Urban Hat€monger ?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,605
Default

We have history
__________________



Urb's RYM Stuff

Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave.
Urban Hat€monger ? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2011, 12:46 PM   #52 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Nosferatu Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 264
Default

Intriguing......
__________________
Wild men who caught and sang the sun in flight,
And learn, too late, they grieved it on its way,
Do not go gentle into that good night.
Nosferatu Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2011, 01:18 PM   #53 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Lord Dweedle's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 127
Default

Micheal Jackson is way better, how could you compare a Rocker to a PopStar??? its like comparing Viagra to Oranges
Lord Dweedle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2011, 01:35 PM   #54 (permalink)
Mate, Spawn & Die
 
Janszoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Rapping Community
Posts: 24,593
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by starrynight View Post
Surely. He must have wrote many more great melodies than Michael Jackson. The whole Michael Jackson as 'king of pop' was just a record company idea in the early 90s.
I'm sure there are quite a few people who would be reasonable contenders for the crown over Michael Jackson, but Paul McCartney isn't one of them.
Janszoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2011, 01:48 PM   #55 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 937
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord Dweedle View Post
Micheal Jackson is way better, how could you compare a Rocker to a PopStar??? its like comparing Viagra to Oranges
Michael Jackson got called the King of Pop. Anyway it is funny that someone who hails The Spice Girls dismisses McCartney who wrote many standards across a whole range of styles (rock, pop or whatever).
__________________
non-cliquey member of every music forum I participate on
starrynight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2011, 04:41 PM   #56 (permalink)
Divination
 
Necromancer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,655
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by starrynight View Post
Michael Jackson got called the King of Pop. Anyway it is funny that someone who hails The Spice Girls dismisses McCartney who wrote many standards across a whole range of styles (rock, pop or whatever).
I hate the Spice Girls and I still just don't care that much about McCartney either, for one thing he's very overrated as a bass player, Jermaine Jackson is a better bassist in my opinion. I actually like George Harrison's solo material verses McCartney. And Harrison, nothing to write home about.

Last edited by Necromancer; 07-06-2011 at 04:48 PM.
Necromancer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2011, 05:43 PM   #57 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Lord Dweedle's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 127
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by starrynight View Post
Michael Jackson got called the King of Pop. Anyway it is funny that someone who hails The Spice Girls dismisses McCartney who wrote many standards across a whole range of styles (rock, pop or whatever).
oh no no, im not dismissing Paul, he is very good, but I think that comparing Paul and Micheal is too out of place, on 1 hand you have a guy who basicly invented rock with the beatles, on the other hand you have a very talented dancer, singer and song writer.. its just too different to compare
Lord Dweedle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2011, 02:25 AM   #58 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 937
Default

Arguably McCartney has done more as a songwriter, and I judge musicians by that more than anything.
__________________
non-cliquey member of every music forum I participate on
starrynight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2011, 05:48 AM   #59 (permalink)
Horribly Creative
 
Unknown Soldier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: London, The Big Smoke
Posts: 8,265
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by starrynight View Post
Arguably McCartney has done more as a songwriter, and I judge musicians by that more than anything.
As influential as he is, I can`t really say I`ve ever enjoyed any of his solo material or stuff with Wings etc. I`d put him in the same category as David Bowie and Mick Jagger as icons who were always at their best when working with the bands that made them famous, or in Bowie`s case in his golden era of the 70`s. These artists as well, have usually tarnished their reputation by working with just about anybody. Does it get any worse than Jagger and Bowie singing "Dancing in the Street" or McCartney and Jackson singing "Say Say Say" and Elton John and George Michael with "Don`t Let the Sun Go Down on Me." Personally, I`d sooner listen to Lionel Richie at least he was up front with the mediocre material he put out and made it reasonably listenable.
Unknown Soldier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2011, 08:19 AM   #60 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 937
Default

Can't Slow Down was a good album, not mediocre to me or many others. Not sure if the rest of Lionel Richie's work is as good though.

I don't really care about the duets. I think he has done enough good and popular songs to be above Jagger or Bowie.
__________________
non-cliquey member of every music forum I participate on
starrynight is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.