Paul McCartney - The REAL King of Pop? - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Pop
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 07-19-2011, 06:42 PM   #11 (permalink)
Divination
 
Necromancer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,655
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Urban Hatemonger View Post
I think you're giving record companies too much credit.
Quote:
Originally Posted by starrynight View Post
Maybe, it could be someone in the media sometimes who sees it as a way to make a group or singer more interesting. But it's definitely something record companies would very enthusiastically take up whether they invented it or not.
I guess if I was planning a career in Musicology, instead of just being a music enthusiast/fan. All the image, popularity, and record sales might matter.

Or of course, if I was a record producer at the record company itself, I might care. I agree with Urban, some people give record companies to much credit. And in my opinion why be over concerned and put so much emphasis on image and all that crap?

Just listen to the music for your own pleasure, all the other **** doesn't really matter.
Necromancer is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Similar Threads



© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.