Paul McCartney - The REAL King of Pop? - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Pop
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 08-05-2011, 04:50 AM   #11 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 937
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neapolitan View Post
That is true about anything in music, you can even say that in regards to The Beatles. What they meant in their own time and what they mean now are entirely different. Even the art music that has survived and is played today has changed its audience over the course of the few hundred years since it first was created.



You are totally missing the point, of course it's not a apples to apples comparison that is clear, saying that about The Beatles was to draw a conclusion for the purpose of showing their importance - when considering both creativity and popularity.
I think there is a big difference between something written 40 years ago and something wrote 300 years ago, the whole world has changed in the way music is produced and consumed.

'Importance' is a very subjective term, popularity rises and falls with fashion. Mozart for example wasn't so popular in the second half of the 19th century. So I'd rather just base it on how much good music I think someone has done irrespective of fashion or anything else.
__________________
non-cliquey member of every music forum I participate on
starrynight is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Similar Threads



© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.