Is it still possible to be innovative in Pop music?

DriveYourCarDownToTheSea · 09-17-2013, 07:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Surell

Yes were arty rock in their day, being a Progressive band, but I think this was usually signified in their compositional expertise as opposed to their embrace of harsher or unfamiliar sounds. It can be hard to get into because of this, such as a disorienting time signature or a melody so complex it's hard to decipher, but overall their sound was based in rock/pop with superb composition and playing. In its day, though, it may have been fairly difficult for the audience, but this was the era when people really loved Sgt. Peppers for being a concept album and having classical undertones - though they really don't stack up compared to Yes' themes and classicism. So it could have to do with the era your siblings/generation came from, with their acceptance of a certain degree of experimentation (do you guys dig Captain Beefheart or Velvet Underground as well?) or perhaps it is age that engrains you in a certain mindset/familiarity with the sounds you know, and anything new is hard to accept. When I'm older, I'm sure I'll have some issue with my children's favorite band just because I'm so comfortable with what i know, it's precious to me and i've known it for too long, I suppose.

BTW: AC shows, from what I've seen, are usually people around my age, late teens to early 20s, but usually i'm all in the zone of the show. I saw some older people around the festival i recently saw them (and Grizzly Bear) at, but there were also older acts at the show, such as McCartney and ZZ Topp, the same night as those bands.

Haven't heard of Captain Beefheart until you mentioned them/him/it right now. I'm sure I've heard some Velvet Underground but nothing pops in my head right away.

BTW, since you're young, at some point in your life you might experience something like what I did: Somewhere around 1990 I mostly stopped paying attention to new music, because that's when Grunge came out. I had a roommate who was into Nirvana and the like, and he used to play them all the time, and I thought to myself, "What's the big deal? This sounds just like Neil Young's hard rock version of 'My My Hey Hey.'" Some guys moaning into a microphone. So I thought, if the latest and greatest thing was something that sounded just like something that was already more than 10 years old, then rock/pop music must be going downhill, and it wasn't worth the bother anymore. Couple that with the fact that that's when rap started becoming really popular, which I couldn't stand. The only time between then and in June (when you got me listening to AC) that I payed attention to anything "new" was a brief period about 10 years ago when I started listening to some Brazilian music (some guy on another forum encouraged me to listen to this, which is really great stuff). Anyway, the point is, I think there might be a point in a lot of people's lives when they run across some "new" stuff they don't think is all that great, and figure that means music is going downhill, so they stop paying attention to new stuff. That might be a natural inclination anyway - most people only have so much time to listen to music, and can't spend so much time checking out every new band that comes along, so the slightest excuse to tune out new stuff means they'll do just that and stick with their own true-and-tried material.

EDIT: It was also shortly after 1990 that I really started getting into some Classical music as well. That probably distracted me from paying attention to anything new as much as my disinterest in grunge and rap.