|
|||||||
| Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
| View Poll Results: Favorite? | |||
| King Crimson |
|
9 | 7.26% |
| Yes |
|
13 | 10.48% |
| Pink Floyd |
|
35 | 28.23% |
| Genesis |
|
4 | 3.23% |
| Jethro Tull |
|
8 | 6.45% |
| Emerson, Lake & Palmer |
|
3 | 2.42% |
| Rush |
|
8 | 6.45% |
| Can |
|
11 | 8.87% |
| Gentle Giant |
|
2 | 1.61% |
| Van Der Graaf Generator |
|
2 | 1.61% |
| Hawkwind |
|
1 | 0.81% |
| Caravan |
|
1 | 0.81% |
| Magma |
|
0 | 0% |
| Uriah Heep |
|
0 | 0% |
| Henry Cow |
|
1 | 0.81% |
| Mahavishnu Orchestra |
|
3 | 2.42% |
| Gong |
|
3 | 2.42% |
| Camel |
|
3 | 2.42% |
| The Strawbs |
|
1 | 0.81% |
| Focus |
|
0 | 0% |
| Hatfield and the North |
|
0 | 0% |
| Barclay James Harvest |
|
0 | 0% |
| Renaissance |
|
0 | 0% |
| Eloy |
|
1 | 0.81% |
| Premiata Forneria Marconi |
|
0 | 0% |
| Comus |
|
5 | 4.03% |
| Soft Machine |
|
2 | 1.61% |
| Traffic |
|
2 | 1.61% |
| The Moody Blues |
|
1 | 0.81% |
| Procol Harum |
|
1 | 0.81% |
| Wishbone Ash |
|
0 | 0% |
| Other |
|
4 | 3.23% |
| Voters: 124. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Groupie
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 31
|
Can, with Pink Floyd as a close second.
Can: they were experimental but also extremely smart. All the member were western art music students, but they never lost their time trying to make Rock music akin to Classical or bring Classical conventions into Rock (unlike that godawful E.L.P. group). Instead they merged a truck load of genres in into one package taking into account all the properties of rock music: simplicity, repetition, minimalism. Pink Floyd: Because they were the less prog of all the english prog bands. And actually had a good songwriter. Ignoring the post-Syd, pre-Darkside period they always knew how to trim the fat and drop all the pointless demostration of "talent" in over long, over the top compositions. I do love Echoes and Carefull with that Axe, Eugene. I guess I'm not to big on prog. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |||
|
Dr. Prunk
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Where the buffalo roam.
Posts: 12,156
|
Quote:
Quote:
![]() Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Groupie
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 31
|
I mean I can listen to Yes or Rush but not for the songwriting. I mean is Jon Anderson actually saying anything?
Okay, Genesis also know how to write songs. I was being unfair. Mate, pretension music critics? The only critics I read is Mark Prindle and Starostin, because they are both funny (Prindle because he is and Starostin because he's opinions are truly laughable). I did visit Piero Scaruffi web site once so that may be it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | ||
|
Dr. Prunk
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Where the buffalo roam.
Posts: 12,156
|
Quote:
Nor do I think you have to be a good lyricist to be a good songwriter. Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | ||
|
Groupie
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 31
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | ||
|
Certified H00d Classic
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Bernie Sanders's yacht
Posts: 6,129
|
Well, just for future reference Tchock, not all progressive rock is made up of albums with forty minutes suites and such, lol.
__________________
Anteater's 21 Fav Albums Of 2020 Anteater's Daily Tune Roulette Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Dr. Prunk
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Where the buffalo roam.
Posts: 12,156
|
Yes they are.
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
Dr. Prunk
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Where the buffalo roam.
Posts: 12,156
|
Quote:
But yeah, I'm pretty sure 90% of Jon's lyrics are made up on the spot and used just because they fit well with the music, I think he just uses words he really likes, like "River" and "Mountain". ![]() Of course that's not to say there aren't prog bands with emphasis on lyrics, Ian Anderson, Peter Garbiel, Richard Sinclair and Peter Hammill are pretty tight lyricists IMO, and have a great sense of wit and humor that people often overlook. And Waters of course. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|