Should rock be considered prog just because it's technical? - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Rock & Metal > Prog & Psychedelic Rock
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 11-16-2011, 12:55 PM   #20 (permalink)
Groupie
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tore View Post
That was sort of my point. None of the points you mention are unique to prog rock. Fantasy elements are abound in metal, classical music for example has very long songs, folk rockers have been playing around with old instruments, concept albums can be found in most genres .. and theatrical performances, although it's not something I think of as typical of prog, is also found in other genres.

The point is that a band is prog when it falls within a certain range of possible combinations of certain musical characteristics. That's how useless genres are sometimes. You telling me that a band needs to possess "some elements" in order to be prog only confirms what I wrote.
I feel that the characteristics I have set out are some of the things that people like Roine Stolt, phideaux xavier, Andy Tillison and others like Steven Wilson and Michael Akerfeldt amongst others, are pushing to ensure that the prog genre is a definable music genre. They have helped to make the prog scene what it is today, with it's own monthly magazine.
ericbfg is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.