The Pixies vs Nirvana - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Punk
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

View Poll Results: Which band is better?
Pixies are way better 67 23.93%
I prefer The pixies 62 22.14%
I like them about the Same 40 14.29%
I prefer Nirvana 56 20.00%
Nirvana is way better 55 19.64%
Voters: 280. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 12-29-2010, 11:20 AM   #11 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,219
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Janszoon View Post
I've heard a lot of funny things claimed about Nirvana but this is the strangest by far. In what possible way would you describe Nirvana as death rock? They have way more in common with the Pixies than with someone like Christian Death.
Cobain classified himself as a death rocker. I think the notion pretty much sums up the band.

To downwardspiral:

Two pieces of work by a single artist may not be directly comparable. This occurs where the goals differ and the outcomes are substantially different. I feel that this is the case where the two albums in question are concerned.

In terms of an overall cohesive statement and the notion of conceptual unity, I'll say that In Utero certainly accomplishes a great deal more than Nevermind. But then, Nevermind was not supposed to. In terms of high hitting pop moments, Nevermind wins. But then, In Utero wasn't trying to compete. Thus, the differing aims and outcomes prevent the two records from truly being directly comparable.
Rainard Jalen is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Similar Threads



© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.