No punk today - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Punk
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-13-2013, 04:57 PM   #1 (permalink)
Lord Larehip
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You mean you didn't know punk was dada?? You've heard of the band Cabaret Voltaire, right? You know what that is? It was a gallery where dada anti-art was first exhibited to the public in Zurich 1916. One of the founders, Marcel Janco, explained, “At the Cabaret Voltaire, we began by shocking common sense, public opinion, education, institutions, museums, good taste, in short, the whole prevailing order.” That's punk, man! The word "dada" is meaningless but is also Romanian for "yeah yeah" as in our "yeah whatever."

But the idea that dada is essentially meaningless or random is quite fitting for Dada itself as it rejected art with deeper meanings and rejected such concepts as a “masterpiece.” Dada art was deliberately superficial. What you saw was what you got. Whatever meaning you got from it was your interpretation alone. Another interpretation was just as valid. And if you got no meaning from it, that was just as valid as any meaning one found. Dada artists never tried to explain their pieces and often because they couldn’t, it was often randomly generated. While traditional art laughs at the child who paints a random image and, when asked it is, replies, “I won’t know until I’m done with it,” Dada embraced this attitude as the very core its philosophy and even adding, “And I probably still won’t know.”

People don't think very much about how important art is in political philosophy and discourse--not to mention war. There's a reason dada was embraced among the anarchists but despised by the Nazis. Max Ernst was even imprisoned by the Nazis for his art. The Nazi vision for Europe and the world was not political but aesthetic, artistic. They didn't view Jews so much as a political danger as they did vermin, an infestation, in need of liquidation for the good of all. They had no place in Hitler's perfectly ordered vision.

Look at Nazi art and buildings. Always neat, clean, orderly. Always perfect specimens of Aryan superiority. All the buildings Albert Speer designed for Hitler were grand, majestic, lots of marble and tall, sturdy columns with floors so clean and uncluttered they looked uninhabited. There was a place for everything and everything was in its place. And if you didn't fit in--Jew, Gypsy, non-white, retarded, homosexual, disabled, even old--the only place for you was a mass grave.





What did the Nazis use to gas inmates? Zyklon B, a prussic acid, used for what? As insecticide. Again, they were killing vermin. No political justification needed. There was simply no place for them in the Third Reich. They were not part of Hitler's aesthetics.

In 1937, the Nazis removed all dada art from Germany. Here, they list what they called entartete kunst or degenerate art and one can read "dada" and "Ernst." Another name listed is George Grosz, another big dadaist.



Grosz depicted his fellow Germans as cruel, unfeeling, unthinking automatons driven only by greed and lust:


Ernst depicted "The Angel of Hearth and Home" as it danced across the barren European landscape bearing a striking resemblance to a swastika:


Dada was mostly anti-war and anti-politics, largely atheistic and anarchistic. Likewise were the punkers. One need only listen to DRI or Discharge (before the horrible "Grave New World") for proof. And who became the punks' biggest enemy? The Nazi skins. Remarkable how history repeats itself.

While punk might be over, the dada spirit lives on. Wherever there are conservatives and liberals--both cowards and hypocrites full of hate and cut from the exact same cloth--there will be war. And war there is war, there will be dada to rebel against it.

“…a phenomenon bursting forth in the midst of the postwar economic and moral crisis, a savior, a monster, which would lay waste to everything in its path. [It was] a systematic work of destruction and demoralization...In the end it became nothing but an act of sacrilege.”

Ah but isn't that how it always goes?


Anti - What Do You Do - YouTube
Anti was founded by Gary Kail who also founded a punk-noise unit called Zurich 1916.


Naked City - Thrash Jazz Assassin - YouTube


Naked City - Kaoru - YouTube
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2013, 06:30 PM   #2 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
hip hop bunny hop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,381
Default

Anyone else a fan of Lord Larehips rather rambling & contradictory statements on war?



Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord Larehip View Post
You mean you didn't know punk was dada?? You've heard of the band Cabaret Voltaire, right? You know what that is? It was a gallery where dada anti-art was first exhibited to the public in Zurich 1916. One of the founders, Marcel Janco, explained, “At the Cabaret Voltaire, we began by shocking common sense, public opinion, education, institutions, museums, good taste, in short, the whole prevailing order.” That's punk, man! The word "dada" is meaningless but is also Romanian for "yeah yeah" as in our "yeah whatever."

But the idea that dada is essentially meaningless or random is quite fitting for Dada itself as it rejected art with deeper meanings and rejected such concepts as a “masterpiece.” Dada art was deliberately superficial. What you saw was what you got. Whatever meaning you got from it was your interpretation alone. Another interpretation was just as valid. And if you got no meaning from it, that was just as valid as any meaning one found. Dada artists never tried to explain their pieces and often because they couldn’t, it was often randomly generated. While traditional art laughs at the child who paints a random image and, when asked it is, replies, “I won’t know until I’m done with it,” Dada embraced this attitude as the very core its philosophy and even adding, “And I probably still won’t know.”

People don't think very much about how important art is in political philosophy and discourse--not to mention war. There's a reason dada was embraced among the anarchists but despised by the Nazis. Max Ernst was even imprisoned by the Nazis for his art. The Nazi vision for Europe and the world was not political but aesthetic, artistic. They didn't view Jews so much as a political danger as they did vermin, an infestation, in need of liquidation for the good of all. They had no place in Hitler's perfectly ordered vision.

Look at Nazi art and buildings. Always neat, clean, orderly. Always perfect specimens of Aryan superiority. All the buildings Albert Speer designed for Hitler were grand, majestic, lots of marble and tall, sturdy columns with floors so clean and uncluttered they looked uninhabited. There was a place for everything and everything was in its place. And if you didn't fit in--Jew, Gypsy, non-white, retarded, homosexual, disabled, even old--the only place for you was a mass grave.

What did the Nazis use to gas inmates? Zyklon B, a prussic acid, used for what? As insecticide. Again, they were killing vermin. No political justification needed. There was simply no place for them in the Third Reich. They were not part of Hitler's aesthetics.

In 1937, the Nazis removed all dada art from Germany. Here, they list what they called entartete kunst or degenerate art and one can read "dada" and "Ernst." Another name listed is George Grosz, another big dadaist.
=

Grosz depicted his fellow Germans as cruel, unfeeling, unthinking automatons driven only by greed and lust:

Ernst depicted "The Angel of Hearth and Home" as it danced across the barren European landscape bearing a striking resemblance to a swastika:


Dada was mostly anti-war and anti-politics, largely atheistic and anarchistic. Likewise were the punkers. One need only listen to DRI or Discharge (before the horrible "Grave New World") for proof. And who became the punks' biggest enemy? The Nazi skins. Remarkable how history repeats itself.

While punk might be over, the dada spirit lives on. Wherever there are conservatives and liberals--both cowards and hypocrites full of hate and cut from the exact same cloth--there will be war. And war there is war, there will be dada to rebel against it.

“…a phenomenon bursting forth in the midst of the postwar economic and moral crisis, a savior, a monster, which would lay waste to everything in its path. [It was] a systematic work of destruction and demoralization...In the end it became nothing but an act of sacrilege.”

Ah but isn't that how it always goes?


Anti was founded by Gary Kail who also founded a punk-noise unit called Zurich 1916.
&

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord Larehip View Post
We're talking about Muslims. You can't expect logical thinking from these people. Who will they gas next? That's exactly the problem--who the f-uck knows??

You can't attribute logical motives into the heads of people who are encouraged if not mandated to think irrationally at least I sure wouldn't recommend it.
(^^^ in that thread Lord Larehip strikes an exceptionally hawkish, pro-war stance)

&

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord Larehip View Post
That's other countries. America is a scam. That's all it is. Nothing is implemented unless some fatcat at the top is making big money off it. Single payer works in the military because people in the military are driven by duty not money. Nobody who wants to make money joins the military. In the civilian world, money is all there is. If it doesn't make somebody some money, it's not going to happen. A civilian single payer system in America is just a scam. Underneath, it's the same old s-hit going on--the rich getting richer.


....srsly guise
__________________
Have mercy on the poor.
hip hop bunny hop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2013, 06:55 PM   #3 (permalink)
The Music Guru.
 
Burning Down's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Beyond the Wall
Posts: 4,858
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hip hop bunny hop View Post
Anyone else a fan of Lord Larehips rather rambling & contradictory statements on war?


&



(^^^ in that thread Lord Larehip strikes an exceptionally hawkish, pro-war stance)

&


....srsly guise
What does any of that have to do with this thread?
Burning Down is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2013, 10:13 PM   #4 (permalink)
GuD
Dude... What?
 
GuD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,322
Default



Does this sound ANYTHING like punk rock from the 70s? Does it sound like it wants to just make money by rehashing old sounds and filtering them through a poppy-lense to sell records, aided by swag-a-licious skinny jeans and a perfectly teased haircut?

What about this:



Or this:



Three completely different sounding punk bands with more or less the same ideoliges/values between each other as well as Television, The Ramones, or The Clash. These songs were released less than 5 years ago and are still relevant today, as are songs from punk's birth in the 70s.

You're attempting to discredit and diminish something pretty ****ing important to a lot of people and being straight up disrespectful in the process. You're contradicting yourself left and right, to the point where it's like you're trying to draw lines from 'Q' to '#4'. Punk Rock never died, it can't, it never even had a unified credo in the first place.

Dadaism? Really? You think a band like the Ramones or Buzzcocks gave a **** about DADA? Like, 90% of their songs are just about having a good time and girls. ****, Johnny Ramone was a REPUBLICAN WHO SUPPORTED REAGAN AND GEORGE BUSH (Sr. & Jr.). Granted, plenty of the more artsy punk bands such as BAUHAUS did love Dada, but that's not even close to being a defining attribute for every punk band ever. Even Peter Murphy says it was all BS:

Quote:
We were anti-rock 'n' roll and that might be pretentious but there's pretense in every aspect of art. It's all an act.
In the end, Punk means different things to different people and saying it's "dead" is akin to saying that what punk bands and their fans are doing is pointless. If that's your opinion, fine, but you really don't deserve to know anything about punk at all then.
__________________
I spit bullets in my feet
Every time I speak
So I write instead
And still people want me dead
~msc

Last edited by GuD; 10-13-2013 at 12:08 AM. Reason: maybe i took it too personally. toned it down a bit.
GuD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2013, 01:21 PM   #5 (permalink)
Master, We Perish
 
Surell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Havin a good time, rollin to the bottom.
Posts: 3,710
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord Larehip View Post
I don't know!! But you're talk as though you do know and I am asking you--DO YOU KNOW? Quit trying to change the subject and just answer the question: Do you know any of the guys in the Ramones?
Nope, but I learned about them. Same way you learned about them. Any less relevant? No. Moving on.


Quote:
Yeah and? Doesn't mean they can't be influenced by anything. I was friends with the wife of Frank Discussion of Feederz and he was a total Situationist at that time. I don't know about now. Liking what you like and bowing down to authority are not exactly the same thing.
Dada is a pretty embracing movement to take on when you're trying to counter the previous movements. It actually traces back to some of the Beatles' and Bowie's songwriting, which doesn't seem like their biggest points of inspiration; though Bowie helped the Stooges out and the Beatles took from Phil Spector, they highlighted proggier elements of music that I don't think Punk rock would have exactly wanted to take cues from.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord Larehip View Post
But I asked him point-blank if he knew these guys and i can't get a straight answer. H enever said anything about documentaries or anything else. If that's where he learned what he clams to know about these guys then he would have said so. He's making an assumption and stating it as though it is fact. And he knows he overstepped his boundaries and got called on it.
Hey, if you want to sit here and lie, that's fine, but I did point you to a source, go look back at my reply before last. But you're actually the one getting called on bullshit here, I'd like to not be projected upon.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord Larehip View Post
I never said they were!
Oh, you didn't, my bad, I just misunderstood you when you said:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord Larehip View Post
You mean you didn't know punk was dada??
Quote:
The other guy was saying they were too anti-intellectual to be influenced by something like dada. I asked him how he knows that and it seems that he doesn't.
How do you figure? Is it because I didn't agree?

Quote:
All I said was that they could have been since when you're playing an underground band in a big city you WILL meet a lot of people and make a lot of connections and get turned on to a lot of stuff you didn't know about before.
Yeah, like Hip Hop. And since I'm not listing enough documentaries for you, here.

Quote:
I'm speaking from personal experience and if it happened to me, why wouldn't have happened to the Ramones?
You didn't play when or where the Ramones played, as the Ramones or their peers. That's possibly why.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhateverDude View Post
Laser beams, psychedelic hats, and for some reason kittens. Surrel reminds me of kittens.
^if you wanna know perfection that's it, you dumb shits
Spoiler for guess what:
|i am a heron i ahev a long neck and i pick fish out of the water w/ my beak if you dont repost this comment on 10 other pages i will fly into your kitchen tonight and make a mess of your pots and pans

Last edited by Surell; 10-14-2013 at 01:27 PM.
Surell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2013, 03:07 PM   #6 (permalink)
Lord Larehip
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Surell View Post
Nope, but I learned about them. Same way you learned about them. Any less relevant? No. Moving on.
If you learned about them the same way I did then how can you know their artistic predilections if I didn't?

Quote:
Dada is a pretty embracing movement to take on when you're trying to counter the previous movements. It actually traces back to some of the Beatles' and Bowie's songwriting, which doesn't seem like their biggest points of inspiration; though Bowie helped the Stooges out and the Beatles took from Phil Spector, they highlighted proggier elements of music that I don't think Punk rock would have exactly wanted to take cues from.
No, you're thinking of Magritte. Paul is a big Magritte fan. That's not dada, I hope you know. Magritte was not a dadaist. There's a big difference between:



and:



Now, gee, which picture would you be more likely to see on a punk album cover? We already know which one appeared on a prog band's album cover (although not a very good prog band IMO),
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2013, 09:40 PM   #7 (permalink)
Master, We Perish
 
Surell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Havin a good time, rollin to the bottom.
Posts: 3,710
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord Larehip View Post
If you learned about them the same way I did then how can you know their artistic predilections if I didn't?
I was highlighting the fact that you believed that your learning was somehow superior to mine, or that mine was irrelevant. I don't believe what you're saying is irrelevant, I just don't agree with it.



Quote:
No, you're thinking of Magritte. Paul is a big Magritte fan. That's not dada, I hope you know. Magritte was not a dadaist.
I was actually talking about George, though it may be pretty loose, but he picked "While My Guitar Gently Weeps" out of a random page of a book, essentially, if I remember a part of Living in the Material World correctly.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhateverDude View Post
Laser beams, psychedelic hats, and for some reason kittens. Surrel reminds me of kittens.
^if you wanna know perfection that's it, you dumb shits
Spoiler for guess what:
|i am a heron i ahev a long neck and i pick fish out of the water w/ my beak if you dont repost this comment on 10 other pages i will fly into your kitchen tonight and make a mess of your pots and pans
Surell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2013, 11:43 PM   #8 (permalink)
carpe musicam
 
Neapolitan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Les Barricades Mystérieuses
Posts: 7,710
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord Larehip View Post
If you learned about them the same way I did then how can you know their artistic predilections if I didn't?



No, you're thinking of Magritte. Paul is a big Magritte fan. That's not dada, I hope you know. Magritte was not a dadaist. There's a big difference between:



and:

Now, gee, which picture would you be more likely to see on a punk album cover? We already know which one appeared on a prog band's album cover (although not a very good prog band IMO),
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by mord View Post
Actually, I like you a lot, Nea. That's why I treat you like ****. It's the MB way.

"it counts in our hearts" ?ºº?
“I have nothing to offer anybody, except my own confusion.” Jack Kerouac.
“If one listens to the wrong kind of music, he will become the wrong kind of person.” Aristotle.
"If you tried to give Rock and Roll another name, you might call it 'Chuck Berry'." John Lennon
"I look for ambiguity when I'm writing because life is ambiguous." Keith Richards
Neapolitan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.