Why is "Post-Punk" even considered "Punk"? - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Punk
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-01-2016, 09:08 AM   #61 (permalink)
SOPHIE FOREVER
 
Frownland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East of the Southern North American West
Posts: 35,548
Default

How many albums did they listen to though? I only need an estimate.
__________________
Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth.

Frownland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2016, 08:44 AM   #62 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,366
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by elphenor View Post
The amateuristic DIY thing IS punk

You're getting it wrong thinking punk ever even referred to a specific sound

What do The Damned, Television, and Ramones have in common sound wise?

Basically nothing.
Amateuristic, Simple, (often rather monotone), fast paced, raw, straight to the point/brief music inspired by amateuristic Rock N' Roll bands in order to go back to basics?

I know the DIY and amateuristic thing IS a Punk thing, that's why I said ''still has going on'', you don't need to clarify it. I mean, the amateurism is even in the name. But Punk Rock definitely has a general sound, often with very similar riffing. Hardcore Punk has a sound. Skate Punk has a sound, etc. That those early bands sound different (I think at least, I wasn't there) has more to do with that the genre wasn't fully established yet. I mean, Talking Heads were considered as Punk as the Ramones, despite sounding completely different. What you're doing is almost (It's not the exact same) like saying Powerviolence has no specific sound because Man is the Bastard sounds nothing like Charles Bronson.

Last edited by Dylstew; 07-02-2016 at 08:53 AM.
Dylstew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2016, 09:14 AM   #63 (permalink)
one-balled nipple jockey
 
OccultHawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Dirty Souf Biatch
Posts: 22,033
Default

I know the Talking Heads were part of that NYC scene and you can say as punk as Television but not the Ramones. I don't think that's true.
OccultHawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2016, 11:25 AM   #64 (permalink)
one-balled nipple jockey
 
OccultHawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Dirty Souf Biatch
Posts: 22,033
Default

I respect that opinion. But when defining origins all must bow. The Ramones are the Creator. The best. The purest. The hooks that remain. Most High. All Praise.
OccultHawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2016, 11:42 AM   #65 (permalink)
one-balled nipple jockey
 
OccultHawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Dirty Souf Biatch
Posts: 22,033
Default

No. They're deity. I worship them because they are Gods. So should you.
OccultHawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2016, 01:26 PM   #66 (permalink)
SOPHIE FOREVER
 
Frownland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East of the Southern North American West
Posts: 35,548
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by elphenor View Post
I love Ramones but the holding them up on a pedestal is ironic when we're talking about bands who's whole goal was to burn the sacred cows of their time

Death to the cliches of rock music
Death to punk cliches?
__________________
Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth.

Frownland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2016, 01:29 PM   #67 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,366
Default

I got to admit I quickly wrote that and have never listened to television, but I tink the Ramomed and the Damned have quite a bit in common, at least their early work, which admittedly is their only work I actually listen to. But I just heavily disagree punk doesn't have sounds, it has them just like metal. In fact, if there's one genre with a bajillion bands that sound the same, it's Punk.

Last edited by Dylstew; 07-02-2016 at 01:37 PM.
Dylstew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2016, 01:38 PM   #68 (permalink)
one-balled nipple jockey
 
OccultHawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Dirty Souf Biatch
Posts: 22,033
Default

Metal has splintered into an infinity of diversity

Punk had its brilliance up front

But metal has had its brilliance in perpetuity
OccultHawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2016, 09:33 PM   #69 (permalink)
Jacob Sartorius
 
Blank.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Dank memes
Posts: 4,034
Default

I don't know enough about post-punk to comment on that.

But punk definitely has a sound. I don't think it's an attitude. I mean, you could match that same attitude to some metal bands and rock bands. Godsmack did a bit of the DIY in their early days. Would you call the early Godsmack stuff punk? I wouldn't. And if you said they are, I'd say your ****ing dumb for claiming they are.

Punk rock is without a doubt a sound. To claim it's not is absurd to be frank.
Blank. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2016, 09:51 PM   #70 (permalink)
one-balled nipple jockey
 
OccultHawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Dirty Souf Biatch
Posts: 22,033
Default

I agree. It's a sound. Like any major genre it covers a wide spectrum. On the other hand, it does have a definitive core.
OccultHawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.