Why is "Post-Punk" even considered "Punk"? - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Punk
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-04-2016, 10:14 AM   #1 (permalink)
Jacob Sartorius
 
Blank.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Dank memes
Posts: 4,034
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TechnicLePanther View Post
Okay, so attitude of punk is [see above], and sound of punk is 4/4 tempos, simple and repetitive chord patterns, general loudness, and bad vocalists. Anybody have any counter-examples that will force us to add to the list?
I can agree with this entirely. The punk bands that don't meet these qualifications I don't consider punk. I think that's when they start moving into the punk rock surgenres like post-punk and new wave. Maybe not those ones specifically, but i think you get my point.
Blank. is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.