Why is "Post-Punk" even considered "Punk"? - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Punk
Why is "Post-Punk" even considered "Punk"? Why is "Post-Punk" even considered "Punk"?
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 07-07-2016, 05:50 PM   #11 (permalink)
Primo Celebate Sexiness
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 2,662
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frownland View Post
And I'm saying that you can connect quite a few albums that are definitely not prog to prog rock classics, which is what happens to Pink Floyd. Long form psychedelic jams can be found outside of prog, like in psychedelic music.

Pink Floyd is not prog.
If there are a lot of sensible connections to make, I think connecting them to it is logical.

Pink Floyd is prog.
__________________
I'm a pretty nice troll if you ask me.
JGuy Grungeman is offline   Reply With Quote
 

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Similar Threads


Terms & Privacy - Contact Us - Music Banter - Archive - Top

© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.