Interesting....that you may think any tune has 'great' sound through your netbook PC speakers :)

no, a good song will be good even if played through a crap sound system

a bad song will be a bad on a million-dollar set-up

true; a bad song will always be 'bad' [which is 'personal taste' really]
but a quality rig .....makes a 'fabulous' song sound 'stellar' [just saying :)]

never believed in that, really

i'm a musician, i prefer music "dry" and "soft" - can hear the notes clearer that way

now...

as you may see, the first line says exactly what you said in all that. I got the point and you just repeated the point I made back to me.

Nice try though.

So it can be concluded that Rammstein sound crap, regardless of whether the listener has a super stereo system or Howard's netbook speakers.

not going to lie though, i like this song...... but only cause i like that bass line



and it kinda sounds like he says cum in my butt in the start of it.

No, some songs are dependent upon good sound reproduction in order to be fully appreciated.
Try listening to some audiophile equipment and you will immediately realise that this is the case.
You will hear a 'sound stage', you will hear instrument placement, the breathing of the vocalist, the finger of the musicians moving and more.....
If you listen to the Alan Parsons Project you can actually hear Alan fingers moving the sliders on the mixing desk.
Your argument supposes that going to listen to a top orchestra playing in the Albert Hall is the same as listening to it over the telephone. Clearly the two experiences are diametrically opposed.

Seaman Staines?

Rammstein ****ing rule!