Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Rock & Metal
Register Blogging Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-19-2006, 05:30 PM   #11 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
bungalow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hot-lanta
Posts: 3,140
Default

You always agree...
bungalow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2006, 05:31 PM   #12 (permalink)
isfckingdead
 
sleepy jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 18,969
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bungalowbill357
You always agree...
Would you rather I post the exact same thing she said, except with different words?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by METALLICA89 View Post
Ive seen you on muiltipul forums saying Metallica and slayer are the worst **** you kid go suck your **** while you listen to your ****ing emo **** I bet you do listen to emo music
sleepy jack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2006, 05:31 PM   #13 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
bungalow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hot-lanta
Posts: 3,140
Default

Yes.
bungalow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2006, 05:35 PM   #14 (permalink)
butt say x
 
mosesandtherubberducky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: so i read the question as "Where YOU live" which was kinda funny instead of "Where you live"
Posts: 1,649
Default

I would say live is better, because it can have those extended songs (not like the Allman Brothers) and covers. When I saw The White Stripes, Jack went into a slide solo out of nowhere and it was great. But if the band sucks live then studio is better. I guess that is just common logic.
__________________
Can I have a youtube video for a sig? There's a thing that says "Wrap [YOUTUBE] tags around selected text"
mosesandtherubberducky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2006, 08:54 PM   #15 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
boo boo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Where the buffalo roam.
Posts: 12,137
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by one_more_atrocity
iagree with the part how bands sound better in the studio cus if you listen to the album version of thesong and then hear the same song done live the album is far better but your not taking into account the experience of live music which, although not as good or usually as precise as a studio song actually standing there in the crowd can not be beaten by just slaping on an album in your bedroom, so i would go for live.
I have been to some concerts, i couldnt stand the noise, i literaly had to cover my ears the whole time, too loud for me.


I have OCD and i have claustophobic tendencies, so i also have a problem with large groups of people.
boo boo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2006, 10:10 PM   #16 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Muzak Geek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Wake Forest, NC
Posts: 87
Default

I'd have to say that it totally depends on the band - Although, in general, I enjoy listening to artists live more than I do a CD… I think it allows you to appreciate the creation of the music more when you see it performed in front of you.

I don't necessarily subscribe to the idea that certain genres sound better in the studio - due to lack of being able to reproduce studio "wizardry", tricks, or whatever. I've seen lots of so-called "studio bands" (Radiohead, Gradaddy, Pink Floyd, Yes, etc.) who put on fantastic live shows, and sound just as good live (if not better) than on CD. If the band sucks live, then to me that just says that all that "studio wizardry" I heard on their CD was nothing more than a producer's cover-up for a mediocre band or artist.
__________________
Up, up, down, down, left, right, left, right, B, A, Start… Just because we use cheats, doesn't mean we're not smart.
Muzak Geek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2006, 10:23 PM   #17 (permalink)
Groupie
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 8
Default

studio is good. but when a band is simply amazing live, there's nothing like that. Some bands, like black sabbath, actually sound BETTER live in my opinion. which is really weird. Especially when you hear a solo and you're like "there's no way your fingers would fall off" then you see it happen. also the studio sometimes gives the illusion of this thing called "talent". if you can't pla it live, then don't play it. i've seen this too often.
__________________
Hai bambini? Da Mangiare?
"it's not rape, it's surpise sex."- Nick
PaWp_tarHTs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2006, 10:12 PM   #18 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
fidelityfiend's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Tampa FLA
Posts: 80
Default

and remember y'all - the artists get PAID for playing live. CD sales pay the lawyers and the Execs - not the artists!!!!!
__________________
is it 4:20 yet?
fidelityfiend is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2006, 07:50 PM   #19 (permalink)
Groupie
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 14
Default

Studio recordings for sure for most music. The exception being artists like Kurt Cobain who's music was so much based on raw emotion. For artists like that, I find the live experience is often better.
bzbee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2006, 10:24 PM   #20 (permalink)
Crazyyyyyy Train
 
Celladorina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,831
Default

Live is the shizzle, it's louder, hotter and it's just damn wicked.
Celladorina is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads



© 2003-2019 Advameg, Inc.