Originally Posted by ShadowSurfer

in your opinion.

Originally Posted by judas_priest

yeah, I like KISS. I prefered them with their make-up. After that they kind of sold out and their music wasn't very good. The make-up was entertaining too. :)

Originally Posted by ShadowSurfer

No, the point is, Kurt's ripped jeans and flannel shirt was every bit the costume as anything KISS wore.

Originally Posted by hiu

Not really. Kurt wore these things as everyday casual clothing, there is nothing more to it.

Originally Posted by ShadowSurfer

yes, the only KISS worth bothering with is from 1974-1978. The rest is hit or miss.

But they revolutionized the rock concert experience. Just look at the history books and count the number of things KISS did - including the first band to break attendance records held by The Beatles at Budkoan.

Originally Posted by ShadowSurfer

wrong. it became his image, which became the same kind of costume KISS wore. Kurt's grunge look was every bit the costume KISS was.

disagree? that's okay.

Originally Posted by bungalowbill357

But The Beatles were actually able to set that record based on musical talent.
KISS had to rely on theatrics.

Originally Posted by Urban Hatemonger

:laughing:

Oh yeah because I can just imagine Gene Simmons walking around his house in the morning getting his breakfast in full costume & make up.