Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Rock & Metal
Register Blogging Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-13-2006, 02:49 PM   #1 (permalink)
Groupie
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 12
Default Metallica Sucks

Why does Metallica suck so bad these days?
vmixer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2006, 02:51 PM   #2 (permalink)
isfckingdead
 
sleepy jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 18,969
Default

St. Anger wasn't that bad of an album. People just compare it to their early work and then dismiss it off as crap instead of listening to the album for what it has.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by METALLICA89 View Post
Ive seen you on muiltipul forums saying Metallica and slayer are the worst **** you kid go suck your **** while you listen to your ****ing emo **** I bet you do listen to emo music
sleepy jack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2006, 03:47 PM   #3 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Muzak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,050
Default

They don't suck, their new stuff is just alot simpler than there older stuff.
Muzak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2006, 03:47 PM   #4 (permalink)
killedmyraindog
 
TheBig3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Posts: 9,252
Default

best question ever
TheBig3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2006, 07:00 PM   #5 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
boo boo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Where the buffalo roam.
Posts: 12,137
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crowquill
St. Anger wasn't that bad of an album. People just compare it to their early work and then dismiss it off as crap instead of listening to the album for what it has.
True.

But they are nowhere near as good as they were 15 years ago.
boo boo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2006, 07:32 PM   #6 (permalink)
angel of tragic days
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 924
Default

its not offten that once big bands always stay on top.. this band fell apart and still came out stronge.. no there not as great, and what crowqill said made loads of sense.. but like with most bands after a while they just lose there touch or change there direction a little bit and fans in stead of looking at it that way, they just think they went from great awesomeness to crap.
explosions-in-my-pants is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2006, 07:38 PM   #7 (permalink)
butt say x
 
mosesandtherubberducky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: so i read the question as "Where YOU live" which was kinda funny instead of "Where you live"
Posts: 1,649
Default

Sorry but this had to be said...


in your opinion
__________________
Can I have a youtube video for a sig? There's a thing that says "Wrap [YOUTUBE] tags around selected text"
mosesandtherubberducky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2006, 11:37 AM   #8 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
PostPsychosis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 172
Default

Why the hell can't people leave 'tallica alone? Load sucked, and St. Anger really sucked, but at least they are trying something new, even if it is horrible. I think if a band like Metallica can have 2 crappy albums because they tried something new and strayed from the same old same old, then they deserve more respect than a band who releases 10 "good" albums with the same formula over and over again.
__________________
Descending from Heaven
The Angel Sworn to bring them down
The Hunter, The Thunder
The Wrath of Heavens Coming Down
PostPsychosis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2006, 12:28 PM   #9 (permalink)
dontcareaboutyou
 
swim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 5,188
Default

cliff burton dying is why metallica fell apart. and they dont suck. theyre different. Their first four albums were metal and, their past four (not counting garage inc because they didnt do any writing) have been rock. lars said that when cliff died they lost their soul. he knew the most music theory and what everyone else knew they pretty much learned from him. as a bassist i really doubt he did most of the writing he did something more important he arranged it. the music metallica is making isnt bad it's just not put in the best order. no band can possibly expected to be the same after they lose a musician as great as cliff.
swim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2006, 12:33 PM   #10 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
PostPsychosis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 172
Default

Actually Cliff did a lot of the writing, especially on MOP. But if Cliff had still been around then I doubt 'tallica would have worked with Bob Rock, who as a producer had a negative effect on their music. Fortunately they aren't having him on the next album.
__________________
Descending from Heaven
The Angel Sworn to bring them down
The Hunter, The Thunder
The Wrath of Heavens Coming Down
PostPsychosis is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads



© 2003-2019 Advameg, Inc.