The Official Nirvana/Kurt Cobain Thread (lyrics, country, fan, review) - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Rock & Metal
Register Blogging Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

View Poll Results:
0 0%
Voters: 0. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-10-2006, 09:11 PM   #1191 (permalink)
Groupie
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 14
Default

the death of capitilism: What a very compelling reply. If anything, you're the one who should be shutting the *** up. Get lost, we don't need ignorance like yours here.

Crowquill: They didn't revolutionize anything of the 90's. All they did was take a genre which has existed since the early eighties into public eye. As far as the band itself went, they brought nothing to the sound that hasn't been done before.
Untitled_00 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2006, 09:22 PM   #1192 (permalink)
isfckingdead
 
sleepy jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 18,965
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crowquill View Post
Probaly 'cause nirvana revolutionized mainstream music during the 90s..
Did I say music? Nope, all you did was repeat what I said, genus.

Tons of bands havn't brought anything new to a sound, does it make them bad? Not really, just because a band is mind blowingly original doesn't make them bad.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by METALLICA89 View Post
Ive seen you on muiltipul forums saying Metallica and slayer are the worst **** you kid go suck your **** while you listen to your ****ing emo **** I bet you do listen to emo music
sleepy jack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2006, 09:24 PM   #1193 (permalink)
ashes against the grain
 
tdoc210's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: new hampsha
Posts: 2,617
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Untitled_00 View Post
the death of capitilism: What a very compelling reply. If anything, you're the one who should be shutting the *** up. Get lost, we don't need ignorance like yours here.

Crowquill: They didn't revolutionize anything of the 90's. All they did was take a genre which has existed since the early eighties into public eye. As far as the band itself went, they brought nothing to the sound that hasn't been done before.
lmao two words search funtion

im not ignorant seems as though you are though
__________________
We went back there and they had come and hacked off every inoculated arm. There they were in a pile. A pile of little arms. And I remember... I... I... I cried. I wept like some grandmother. I wanted to tear my teeth out. I didn't know what I wanted to do. And I want to remember it. I never want to forget it. I never want to forget. And then I realized... like I was shot... like I was shot with a diamond... a diamond bullet right through my forehead. And I thought: My God... the genius of that.
tdoc210 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2006, 09:29 PM   #1194 (permalink)
Groupie
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 14
Default

Ha! What irony you showcase. If you're going to try to sarcastically mock me with the word genius, the least you could do is spell the word right.

But that's besides the point. Yes, bands don't necessarily need to be innovative to be good. But when you call a band revolutionary for causing something which was enevidable for the music industry? Er, no. You'll need much more reason than that.
Untitled_00 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2006, 09:32 PM   #1195 (permalink)
isfckingdead
 
sleepy jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 18,965
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Untitled_00 View Post
Ha! What irony you showcase. If you're going to try to sarcastically mock me with the word genius, the least you could do is spell the word right.

But that's besides the point. Yes, bands don't necessarily need to be innovative to be good. But when you call a band revolutionary for causing something which was enevidable for the music industry? Er, no. You'll need much more reason than that.
Contradiction much? "But when you call a band revolutionary for causing something which was enevidable for the music industry?". Point remains, they did cause it making them revolutionary in that way.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by METALLICA89 View Post
Ive seen you on muiltipul forums saying Metallica and slayer are the worst **** you kid go suck your **** while you listen to your ****ing emo **** I bet you do listen to emo music
sleepy jack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2006, 09:32 PM   #1196 (permalink)
Inexplicably Back
 
_Spinning_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 830
Default

Pwned. Foo'
_Spinning_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2006, 09:35 PM   #1197 (permalink)
Groupie
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 14
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by the death of capitilism View Post
im not ignorant seems as though you are though
Hahaha... really? You don't consider telling someone to shut the **** up, saying a band like Nirvana is revolutionary because we've made so and so said threads about them, then finishing the reply by calling that person a noob ignorant?

Untitled_00 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2006, 09:37 PM   #1198 (permalink)
isfckingdead
 
sleepy jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 18,965
Default

Continue your little bitch fight via PMs.
Also, look up ignorant in your dictionary, I swear thats the most overused 'insult' ever and barely anyone knows what it actually means.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by METALLICA89 View Post
Ive seen you on muiltipul forums saying Metallica and slayer are the worst **** you kid go suck your **** while you listen to your ****ing emo **** I bet you do listen to emo music
sleepy jack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2006, 09:40 PM   #1199 (permalink)
Groupie
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 14
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crowquill View Post
Contradiction much? "But when you call a band revolutionary for causing something which was enevidable for the music industry?". Point remains, they did cause it making them revolutionary in that way.
But that's not revolutionary. It's just being successful.
Untitled_00 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2006, 09:42 PM   #1200 (permalink)
isfckingdead
 
sleepy jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 18,965
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Untitled_00 View Post
But that's not revolutionary. It's just being successful.
To revolutionize something, would be to change it in a radical manner. Which nirvana did do for 90s mainstream music.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by METALLICA89 View Post
Ive seen you on muiltipul forums saying Metallica and slayer are the worst **** you kid go suck your **** while you listen to your ****ing emo **** I bet you do listen to emo music
sleepy jack is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes



© 2003-2022 Advameg, Inc.