Dr_Rez

I am not going to go into naming individual qualities, but i feel there overall sound is somewhat different than other bands.

To that im sure you will reply "Well they sound like every other mainstream band now."

In retort to that, i will just say this. I have not listened o many other bands in which I enjoy there lyrics as much as i do Chevelle's. Also i can not think of ONE of band that has that same sound as they do. The closest i can think of is Tool/Perfect circle, which is similar sounding because it is there main influence.

edit: Also i like there broad ariety of sounds throughout there albums/songs. Songs like Panic Prone, Bend the Bracket are a nice hange from the usual faster heavier sound. Then there are faster moving songs with what i think are very good drum beats such as Another Know It All and Brainiac. There are many other different varieties which i will not go into now, but i encourage you to give them another chance if you are judging them based soley off thre single or bigger songs such as the Rd and Vitamin R which are by far not the best songs they have put out.

__________________
*Best chance of losing virginity is in prison crew*
*Always Checks Credentials Crew*
*nba > nfl crew*
*Shave one of my legs to pretend its a girl in my bed crew*

sleepy jack

You know if you're going to bother backing up your opinion on why they're original why say it all? I hear nothing original in their sound, they're your typical nu-metal/hard rock band. List the reasons to their originality or don't call them original.

__________________

Dr_Rez

I think you can figure that out for your self. The same reason i would call another other band original. If you want a list here it is:

1. Many of the beats in here last 3 records are very creative. (at least in my opinion, coming from 8 years of drumming) gallops..etc

2. The singing/vocals are thought out much more than most other bands. ex: The singer NEVER rhymes because he feels that takes away from the lyrics creating only a catchy song that has no sustenance.

3. Have not directly copied any other bands in there sound. And i don't think labeling them as "just another numetal band" is fair or does them any justice at all.

If you'd like i will make this list even longer. But for times sake i will stop.



edit: And to reverse it and put you in my position, how about Elliott Smith. I think he is just another average singer/songerwriter/multi instrumentalist. There were people such as Conor Oberst that came out with music before him that sound VERY similar, therefore making Elliott Smith just another average musician.

And keep in mind this isnt trying to Bash your taste or anything like that, just to help clear up the point i am trying to make

__________________
*Best chance of losing virginity is in prison crew*
*Always Checks Credentials Crew*
*nba > nfl crew*
*Shave one of my legs to pretend its a girl in my bed crew*

sleepy jack

Good drumming doesn't make a band original, we don't call Slipknot original and Jordinson is frequently hailed as a good drummer even from people who don't listen to Slipknot.

Hahaha

Thats a rhyme, even if its a shitty one to rhyme me with me.

Doubt/Out

Aside/Behind/Cry

And this is just taking them from their hits, in Red they rhyme again with again. Chevelle not only rhyme, but they rhyme in a very standard format and uncreative manner. So far your points have amounted to nothing. The Vocals aren't original in any manner, he's just borrowing Maynard's quiet/loud vocal style.

Then why do they sound like Three Days Grace, Finger Eleven, Staind, Cold, Breaking Benjamin, Trapt (who have very similar vocals to this band with supposedly original vocals) and several other bands I could list?

I would because only one point is valid (the first one) which I didn't even check on because I won't subject my ears to them more than I have to and that point really had nothing to do with originality.

For one Conor Oberst didn't come before Elliott Smith and they sound nothing alike. Elliott borrows his acoustic styling more from artists like Nick Drake, or even closer some of Big Star's acoustic stuff (it really depends on which era) while Conor was more influenced by Daniel Johnston and Bob Dylan. Completely different influences and they had completely different sounds. Their acoustic stuff sounded nothing alike, you don't even have to be familiar with folk or acoustic music to realize that. The vocal stylings are totally opposite, Conor screams and has a very unsteady voice while Elliott is once again, on the other end of things with very hushed whispered vocals. When Conor started diving into alt-country later in his career Elliott was diving into very unique baroque pop with slight psychedelic influences. How many songs have you heard that sound like King's Crossing or Shooting Star? I've never hailed Elliott as being original until his later days when he became original. You need to actually listen to something and make sure you know what you're talking about before you go and make completely ignorant comments.

So not only does the point you're making hold no ground because I've only talked about certain points in their careers being original but they don't even sound alike and you obviously had no clue what you were talking about.

__________________

Dr_Rez

I did not say "good drumming" do not misquote me. I said creative also known as original. I will say it again many of the beats used are not found in any of these bands you stated "Three Days Grace, Finger Eleven, Staind, Cold, Breaking Benjamin, Trapt".

Except for the few instances where there is "ryhmes" which i hardly consider that, you have not proved anything. I do not feel the singing is at all similar to ANY of the bands you listed, all of which i have heard much of. (i think rarely having this happen is almost unavoidable anyways)

Also you did not address the point made about Elliot Smith... which puts you in the EXACT same boat as me, left trying to defend yourself against someone who has completely different musical tastes.


edit: You are one of the few people on here i do enjoy arguing/debating with. (Unlike a good deal of people with "superior" taste)

__________________
*Best chance of losing virginity is in prison crew*
*Always Checks Credentials Crew*
*nba > nfl crew*
*Shave one of my legs to pretend its a girl in my bed crew*

sleepy jack

Yeah creative drumming still doesn't make a band original, once again look at Slipknot. Jordinson's drumming isn't similar to any of his contemporaries from KoRn or System of a Down yet we still don't hail them as original. Why? Because drumming is a very small thing in the large scheme of your originality and so far it's the only thing this band has going for them.

Have you not heard Trapt or Tool? How aren't the vocals similar? And how aren't those rhymes? Do I need to define rhymes for you?

I didn't even understand what your point was.

__________________

Farfisa

i mean all the bull pies they are pushing out on the radio nowadays.....i like some mainstream bands but not many

Dr_Rez

First off you don't have to be a jack^ss while arguing your side of this. With that aside...

I strongly disagree with the Coner Oberst sounding different, and yes i have listened to almost everything they have both put out. I do not like Elliot Smith but i still have his first album from 1994 up till his recent 2007 release.

And yes Conor Oberst did come before him... His solo album was released a year before Elliot Smiths in 1993. (Water)


Example: YouTube - Elliott Smith - Whatever ( Folk Song in C ) LIVE < Elliot Smith

YouTube - Conor Oberst - Hubcap < Conor Oberst

Sounds very similar to me, and thats one of many examples. yes difference in singing, with more screaming aggression coming from Oberst. But nothing you couldn't say as a difference between bands such as Chevelle and Stained.


Edit: And to be honest, you obviously do not give bands such as Chevelle an even remotly fair chance before judging them right off the bat.

__________________
*Best chance of losing virginity is in prison crew*
*Always Checks Credentials Crew*
*nba > nfl crew*
*Shave one of my legs to pretend its a girl in my bed crew*

sleepy jack

You're making unfounded statements and not explaining your opinions, that isn't my fault.

How do they sound similar then?

You realize that unreleased solo "album" was a preteen Conor Oberst yelling into a friend's four track right? It sounded nothing like anything Elliott did and if it wasn't for the internet or Bright Eyes no one would even knew or cared it existed. So if you're going to consider that Conor started before Elliott than it should be pointed out Elliott also had an unreleased material from his high school days with a band called Stranger Than Fiction and there was also A Murder of Crows, The Greenhouse and Heatmiser all of which pre-dated Conor's "album."

__________________

Dr_Rez

Before i go off talking about this, which i most certanly will, in time, answer this question since it is the entire reason we are arguing in the first place.

How do Chevelle and Staind sound SO similar?

__________________
*Best chance of losing virginity is in prison crew*
*Always Checks Credentials Crew*
*nba > nfl crew*
*Shave one of my legs to pretend its a girl in my bed crew*