Music Banter

Music Banter (https://www.musicbanter.com/)
-   Rock & Metal (https://www.musicbanter.com/rock-metal/)
-   -   KoRn or Disturbed? (https://www.musicbanter.com/rock-metal/366-korn-disturbed.html)

Necromancer 11-11-2010 08:46 AM

Your above comment shows intellect that carries weight, I guess your intangible asset to MB consists of human knowledge and ideas that are prominent to the forums.

Janszoon 11-11-2010 07:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VocalsBass (Post 955061)
Your above comment shows intellect that carries weight, I guess your intangible asset to MB consists of human knowledge and ideas that are prominent to the forums.

http://www.hennessy.id.au/quentingeo.../gibberish.jpg

Popsicle Season 11-11-2010 08:35 PM

KoRn because I've actually heard them. I hear some good things about Disturbed, but until I hear them, I can't say anything otherwise.

duga 11-11-2010 08:38 PM

I think Korn can retire happy knowing people actually still bother talking about them.

Violent & Funky 11-12-2010 11:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duga (Post 955516)
I think Korn can retire happy knowing people actually still bother talking about them.

I'm not one to be concerned with a band starting off with a few solid releases and then dive-bomb into complete and utter mediocrity. My library reflects that... :laughing:

Raust 11-12-2010 12:35 PM

Not really the biggest fan of either. Disturbed's songs sound the same and musically I'm not a fan of there music. Korns music also sounds the same, but there more musically talented except for there drummer disturbed's drummer is really good. Overally I prefer Korn mainly for the nostalgic value of listening to them as a kid.

someonecompletelyrandom 11-12-2010 02:57 PM

*they're - contraction of they and are.

*there - as in "over there"

*their - possessive, as in "their first record was good".

:rolleyes:

Raust 11-13-2010 02:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Conan (Post 955737)
*they're - contraction of they and are.

*there - as in "over there"

*their - possessive, as in "their first record was good".

:rolleyes:

Thanks for the english lesson!
:finger:

PinkCigarette 11-14-2010 02:06 PM

Korn used to be awesome back in the day but they have since really gone down the sh!tter, imo. Disturbed only has a few songs I like.


I'd still go with Korn, though I don't even bother with them anymore.

leetonitus 11-15-2010 10:31 AM

Korn definitely. I'm judging their first 4 albums only, but in my opinion they were enough. Judging by raw emotion and energy, korn definitely has the edge with jon as the singer. disturbed is good, but you can feel the anger and pain in jons voice and connect with that. he relived his experiences in the studio that fueled the lyrics for his songs. while david is a good singer, he sings off of technicality and skill, jon sings from pure emotion and heart, there is a huge difference there for me, i like something i can connect with.
next thing is that korn's first 4 albums were completely different from each other. self titled was more metal, pure rock, nothing else really. life is peachy seemed like more of an experimental record, just throwing stuff to see what works. follow the leader had more of a hip hop feel to it in general. and issues was more melodic by far and had a smoother sound while still remaining korn. disturbed put out one good album, their first, and the rest in my opinion sound exactly the same.
not to mention that korn started the nu metal scene, they automatically get points for being that much more original. so yeah, korn all the way. and notice the opinions expressed here are just that, opinions and everyone has one.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:13 AM.


© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.