(New)Metallica VS KoRn, SlipknoT VS Cradle Of Filth
 

Hey People, This is My frist Thread, And i Just Want to Know What u Think Of these Bands.
I Like All of Them.


:band: :drummer: :banghead:

I like KoRn and some of the new Metallica.

New Metallica sux. Traditional Metallica kicks @$$. They completely lost the plot with their latest album which took them ages to make and lost a large chunk of their fan base. KoRn rocks, they always will. Slipknot are sort of dying and i havent heard much of Cradle of Filth

All of the bands you like are ugly.


Uuuuh Korn are the best there, but they're not even great these days

How can you compare Korn to Cradle of Filth. There not even close to the same genre. Besides, you would have never heard of them if it weren't for their shirt being at HOT TOPIC. Lame.

Dude this is my Therad, go make your own or something.

Korn are cool, Slipknot are dead, never heard of Cradle of Filth (I think that's a bad thing) and I don't like the new mettalica.

If you don't want people to post in your thread (and yes, everyone will not always agree with you or like the same type of music as you) than don't make anymore. Forums are meant to express opinions, so I suggest you don't don't get all ansy when someone has something to say that you don't agree with. Just some constructive critism.

I'm torn between slipknot and Cradle of Filth......

but altiamtly I choose slipknot, I cant wait for their new CD may 25. As for you people they are not dead they just went away for a bit. Cradle is amazing Danni is my hero, offends more people every minuite then I could in a week. Metallica sucks and should go away, Korn needs to get back into their metal roots and stop with this Linkin Park rap blend crap

COF beats the crap outa all those other bands .. they are freakin awsome :ar_15s:

ive never listened to any cradle of filth, but i have heard of them, and as for slipknot, metallica, and korn, i like all of thier older cds, thier newest ones are a HUGE let down :)

I am not a huge fan of the new metallica but I LOVE KoRn!!! I've been listening to them since I was like 6. What would a world be without KoRn
:bowdown:

im not really overly keen on any of them to be honest but i like slipknots new song "duality"...

i like slips new song too, i dont like koRn because i think they are way overrated and only became popular de to the 13 year old persuasive kids that own 5 of their shirts, and none of their cd's. i feel they lack musical talent because all their songs start off in drop d bar chords and have the same rhythm and tempo...

Metallica and korn cannot be compared they both own too much to choose one but slipknot over cradle of filth as i dont like cradle of filth.

none of these bands have anything in common. Cradle of Filth is horrible. Just outright horrible. The definition case of horrible. But they're still better than the rest. They get my vote.

Slipknot and Cradle of Filth YES!!!!!!!1

Can`t you at least put Spinal Tap on that list?

all of those bands need some serious work, i think they have all gone downhill since "blowing up" Metallica has more good albums than the rest of the bands mentioned but they have just as many bad ones, i thought since they got Robert Truillo the band would rock a little harder, not the case.but i dont think its because of Robert. and newstead went on to join voivod which are better than any of the bands listed.

Cradle of filfth is talented but the singing sucks dude he needs to i dunno quit or something :soapbox:

Wow KoRn are winning, I didn't expect them to be in the lead. I agree with kornslayer, the singing in Cradle Of Filth is absolutely terrible. Saying that though Manson can't sing, but there is a talent to screaming and making it sound good. CoF don't have that talent. At all.

Isn`t Cradle of Filth from Suffolk?

Country bumpkin Satanists

Whatever next?

Uh, they all suck... The only band worthy of praise is MAYBE KoRn, only because they did something very risky and made it big... Slipknot never really made radio status, and New Metallica sux Hardcore... And personally, I hate Cradle of Filth... The band, and the vocals especially.

I absolutly hate new Metallica! KoRn is the SHIIT!!!

KoRn Rock!!
New Metallica as in St Anger sux.
But load an re-load are ok for a ocational listen.

I Love KoRn's cover of the Tallica song ((ONE)) It's great!

all these bands suck on my balls :finger: all you ****ing tools

Metallica beat Korn (notice I used past-tense). Now i'd have to say Korn beats Metallica...*sigh* Never thought I'd have to say that one...

CoF beats Slipknot, except the singing. Grossssssss.

Actually I changed my mind. Slipknot and CoF suck equally.

hate cradle of filth, can put up w/ slip knot, and new metallica sux major. old metallica way better.
as for korn i like korn out of all those choices. old metallica is better than korn but since thats not an option i go w/ korn. and even for korn i perfer the old stuff.
peace

Thank you for pretty much saying exactly what I just said, honestly, congratulations...

New Metallica suck, Korn are just average. Slipknot ROck as do Cof

I'm not going to grace new Metallica with a response, Korn are rubbish, Slipknot are pretty good and CoF are like a wanna be goths wet dream.

Dani Filth made Cradle of Filth, if anyone mentions COF , most peoples minds flick to him. The only problem is, he was an absolute prat. He made COF suck even more than they would have done without him. A hard task to achieve...

I vote between Slipknot and Korn. Not Korn's new "music" though, which I hate with a passion... I know I wanted them to do something new, but I would have prefered it to be good...

hahaha
 

holy ****, almost all of you are completly retarted. KORN... O MY FING LORD... must be none of you have heard there new cd evolution. that is prlly the weakest cd ive ever heard.. its up there with the hanson queers. metallica is the deepest and most original band ever.. PERIOD. st. anger did not suck. u have to listen and get used to it. it was not a normal metallica cd. compare it to korns new cd and you have something amazing. just wait for metallicas cd coming out with issss the 15 of this month i belive. ive read alot about it and james says that they have returned to the old style of metallica. and its heavy. james also says that there new cd is tonz better than st. anger . so for those of you who calls yourselvs fans.... and then ditched them because of one album. here you go now is your time to be a poser again. you can relate metallica to ANY aspect of your life. and you feel it rather than here it... so therefore... I VOTE FOR METALLICA 10 TIMES

Excellent first post, we are all really impressed.

Banned for 1 week

If you come back bring your manners. This is particularly fun for me because you are getting banned for slagging people off in a thread that is two years old

Firstly, you can compare any two albums from any two bands and of course one is going to sound better than the other. Doesn't mean that neither of them suck or not.

Secondly, I'm not a metallica fan, but I've heard some of there old stuff and heard some songs from St. Anger. I think the reason people lost interest in metallica was because THEY released it. If it was some nu-metal band or something, it would be somewhat acceptable. But it was metallica. It'd be like if Death, one of the pioneers of death metal, were to release something like St. Anger; dumbed down, more mainstream, easy-to-swallow sound. It just shot down any expectations people had with metallica. Personally, I think Metallica suck, both old and new, but going from thrash to more of a nu-metal sound, what do you expect?

Thirdly, and this is in reference to the sentence I enhanced; we shouldn't have to get used to an album if we think it sucks. We should give it a chance, sure, but if it sucks, it sucks. "getting used to it" isn't going to make it better.

This isn't in reference to your post, but I have to say, once again, awesome avatar.


Now, in reference to this thread; All four of those bands to me suck in some way;

Metallica- always hearing from fanboys "Oh, new metallica sucks, but old metallica is just straight up awesome thrash." No no no no. Kreator, Slayer, Lunatic, Venom, all better thrash bands.

Slipknot- Will admit that their third album had promise. Each member has some potential. But they don't fulfill it. They just spend their time writing out half assed repeated riffs and solos and it's just crazy to see good musicians wasting their time. The only possible conclusion that I could come to is that either they really aren't great musicians, which is kind of false after seeing some of the outside work some of them had done (Joey playing for Satyricon, Mick playing a guitar solo for Malevolent Creation, which I've yet to hear but expect something great), or they feel comfortable with the cash flow coming from the record sales.

Korn- 7 string guitars, 5 string bass, you could get rid of the higher 3 strings and you could play the same riffs. Nuff said.

Cradle of Filth- Used to LOVE them, but then discovered actual REAL black metal. I prefer Immortal. NEXT!
... nevermind, that's it.

In conclusion, they all are equals. They all have contributed to their genres in some way, they all have sucked in their genres in some way, and they all are getting... worse... every... second... even... as... you... read... this...


Edit- I know this thread is old, but why does the threat maker have a picture of Amon Amarth on here when they are totally irrelevant?

St. Anger was the least mainstream, easy-to-swallow thing Metallica's done since Justice. Not a great album, obviously, but it's a step in the right direction. Better St. Anger than more albums packed with watered-down Kyuss rip-offs and crappy country ballads.

Every band in this thread needs to get AIDS and die in a bus crash.

troof.

jesus, how about Metallica had a career that lasted longer than three years. They made albums large portions of earth cared enough about to own. They had the ability to play their instruments, and they told the dragons and vikings to leave the metal playhouse.

Sorry folks but someone around here needs to have some standards beyond the current trend. Or in this case the one that passed.