Who Sux More? NickleBack or Puddle Of Mudd (lyrics, alternative)

Inuzuka Skysword · 01-22-2007, 07:26 PM

Pom is definately grunge. The only other place you could put POM in would be Alt rock if not grunge. Their sound, however, is heavilly influenced by other grunge artists and their work shows it.

gottaSCREM · 01-23-2007, 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Inuzuka Skysword

Pom is definately grunge. The only other place you could put POM in would be Alt rock if not grunge. Their sound, however, is heavilly influenced by other grunge artists and their work shows it.

POM aren't grunge they are alt. rock, I agree that their music is influenced by many grunge bands or artists and it does sound alike. But it's not only them many other bands are the exact same way where people ofter confuse bands with the same sound or similar sound as grunge. I have to admit it's difficult to spot but POM is definatley missing parts in their music that is related with grunge.

ZeppelinAir · 01-22-2007, 09:43 PM

uh......hits must have somthing to do with how good the music is, if they dont get hits then consider them a sucky band. otherwise i dont see how they can be conisdered crappy.

Nickelback is more of a pop-rock kinda band more than a grunge band in my opinion

sleepy jack · 01-22-2007, 09:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZeppelinAir

uh......hits must have somthing to do with how good the music is, if they dont get hits then consider them a sucky band. otherwise i dont see how they can be conisdered crappy.

So Brittney spears isn't sucky, but Sigur Ros is?

Inuzuka Skysword · 01-23-2007, 04:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZeppelinAir

uh......hits must have somthing to do with how good the music is, if they dont get hits then consider them a sucky band. otherwise i dont see how they can be conisdered crappy.

Nickelback is more of a pop-rock kinda band more than a grunge band in my opinion

Nickelback is defined as grunge......by about every source I know

Mainstream popularity should be thrown out the window when it comes to talent. I know people who can play guitar than any other pop-rco, grunge, whatever band you can think of. And according to the music they play it really isn't that hard. Not only that, but the creativity in mainstream music has died to the point where every song there is a major rip from something. Nobody mainstream plays music to advance music, they lay to get fans, money, and women. Now their are some circumstances (Tool, classic rock bands, etc,) which are talented mainstream, but lets not got here.

Quote:

to someone no she aint, its a matter of taste and personality and opinion. its just the same as me saying the Beatles suck, i hate em, but that doesnt mean they suck

Talent is not a matter of taste and opinion

Quote:

no no, i was just sayin that me sayin the Beatles suck is matter of my personal opinion, that doesnt mean they do. i was just answering your question that Brittney Spears isnt sucky to someone
Yesterday 11:54 PM

You do know they influenced just about every band you probably listen to.

Quote:

they're both sh*tty bands in a huge pile of mediocre musicians fronted by an eddie vedder clone. theory of a dead man, creed, POM, and a ton of others, all sound the same, all have the same formula of catchy, bland lyrics and repetitive riffs. comparing them is like comparing falling to your death or getting shot. You can argue all you want about which is better, but in the end, they both suck horrible for all the same reasons.

I would agree with you on almost everything, but the lyrics part. Not all of theirs are like that, but either way the lyrics aren't good anyways.

gottaSCREM · 01-23-2007, 04:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Inuzuka Skysword

Nickelback is defined as grunge......by about every source I know

What are those sources?

ZeppelinAir · 01-22-2007, 09:53 PM

to someone no she aint, its a matter of taste and personality and opinion. its just the same as me saying the Beatles suck, i hate em, but that doesnt mean they suck

sleepy jack · 01-22-2007, 09:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZeppelinAir

to someone no she aint, its a matter of taste and personality and opinion. its just the same as me saying the Beatles suck, i hate em, but that doesnt mean they suck

Did you just compare the Beatles to Brittney spears?

ZeppelinAir · 01-22-2007, 09:58 PM

no no, i was just sayin that me sayin the Beatles suck is matter of my personal opinion, that doesnt mean they do. i was just answering your question that Brittney Spears isnt sucky to someone

jibber · 01-23-2007, 12:21 AM

they're both sh*tty bands in a huge pile of mediocre musicians fronted by an eddie vedder clone. theory of a dead man, creed, POM, and a ton of others, all sound the same, all have the same formula of catchy, bland lyrics and repetitive riffs. comparing them is like comparing falling to your death or getting shot. You can argue all you want about which is better, but in the end, they both suck horrible for all the same reasons.

01-22-2007, 09:43 PM	#3 (permalink)
ZeppelinAir Long time no see Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: somewhere in Michigan Posts: 513	uh......hits must have somthing to do with how good the music is, if they dont get hits then consider them a sucky band. otherwise i dont see how they can be conisdered crappy. Nickelback is more of a pop-rock kinda band more than a grunge band in my opinion __________________ not that old signature

01-22-2007, 09:53 PM	#7 (permalink)
ZeppelinAir Long time no see Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: somewhere in Michigan Posts: 513	to someone no she aint, its a matter of taste and personality and opinion. its just the same as me saying the Beatles suck, i hate em, but that doesnt mean they suck __________________ not that old signature

01-22-2007, 09:58 PM	#9 (permalink)
ZeppelinAir Long time no see Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: somewhere in Michigan Posts: 513	no no, i was just sayin that me sayin the Beatles suck is matter of my personal opinion, that doesnt mean they do. i was just answering your question that Brittney Spears isnt sucky to someone __________________ not that old signature

01-23-2007, 12:21 AM	#10 (permalink)
jibber Freeskier Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Istanbul was Constantinople now it's Istanbul not Constantinople... Posts: 1,544	they're both sh*tty bands in a huge pile of mediocre musicians fronted by an eddie vedder clone. theory of a dead man, creed, POM, and a ton of others, all sound the same, all have the same formula of catchy, bland lyrics and repetitive riffs. comparing them is like comparing falling to your death or getting shot. You can argue all you want about which is better, but in the end, they both suck horrible for all the same reasons. __________________ What you've done becomes the judge of what you're going to do -- especially in other people's minds. When you're traveling, you are what you are right there and then. People don't have your past to hold against you. No yesterdays on the road. William Least Heat Moon, Blue Highways Your toughest competitor lives in your head. Some days his name is fear, or pain, or gravity. Stomp his ass. HOOKED ON THE WHITE POWDER

01-22-2007, 07:26 PM	#1 (permalink)
Inuzuka Skysword Existential Egoist Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Pennsylvania Posts: 1,468	Pom is definately grunge. The only other place you could put POM in would be Alt rock if not grunge. Their sound, however, is heavilly influenced by other grunge artists and their work shows it.