Who Sux More? NickleBack or Puddle Of Mudd (metal, rock)

ZeppelinAir · 01-22-2007, 09:58 PM

no no, i was just sayin that me sayin the Beatles suck is matter of my personal opinion, that doesnt mean they do. i was just answering your question that Brittney Spears isnt sucky to someone

jibber · 01-23-2007, 12:21 AM

they're both sh*tty bands in a huge pile of mediocre musicians fronted by an eddie vedder clone. theory of a dead man, creed, POM, and a ton of others, all sound the same, all have the same formula of catchy, bland lyrics and repetitive riffs. comparing them is like comparing falling to your death or getting shot. You can argue all you want about which is better, but in the end, they both suck horrible for all the same reasons.

~~The Unfan~~ · 01-23-2007, 11:52 AM

Falling beats being shot simply because you get that moment to think "Oh ****! I fell!"

gottaSCREM · 01-23-2007, 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Inuzuka Skysword

Pom is definately grunge. The only other place you could put POM in would be Alt rock if not grunge. Their sound, however, is heavilly influenced by other grunge artists and their work shows it.

POM aren't grunge they are alt. rock, I agree that their music is influenced by many grunge bands or artists and it does sound alike. But it's not only them many other bands are the exact same way where people ofter confuse bands with the same sound or similar sound as grunge. I have to admit it's difficult to spot but POM is definatley missing parts in their music that is related with grunge.

Inuzuka Skysword · 01-23-2007, 04:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZeppelinAir

uh......hits must have somthing to do with how good the music is, if they dont get hits then consider them a sucky band. otherwise i dont see how they can be conisdered crappy.

Nickelback is more of a pop-rock kinda band more than a grunge band in my opinion

Nickelback is defined as grunge......by about every source I know

Mainstream popularity should be thrown out the window when it comes to talent. I know people who can play guitar than any other pop-rco, grunge, whatever band you can think of. And according to the music they play it really isn't that hard. Not only that, but the creativity in mainstream music has died to the point where every song there is a major rip from something. Nobody mainstream plays music to advance music, they lay to get fans, money, and women. Now their are some circumstances (Tool, classic rock bands, etc,) which are talented mainstream, but lets not got here.

Quote:

to someone no she aint, its a matter of taste and personality and opinion. its just the same as me saying the Beatles suck, i hate em, but that doesnt mean they suck

Talent is not a matter of taste and opinion

Quote:

no no, i was just sayin that me sayin the Beatles suck is matter of my personal opinion, that doesnt mean they do. i was just answering your question that Brittney Spears isnt sucky to someone
Yesterday 11:54 PM

You do know they influenced just about every band you probably listen to.

Quote:

they're both sh*tty bands in a huge pile of mediocre musicians fronted by an eddie vedder clone. theory of a dead man, creed, POM, and a ton of others, all sound the same, all have the same formula of catchy, bland lyrics and repetitive riffs. comparing them is like comparing falling to your death or getting shot. You can argue all you want about which is better, but in the end, they both suck horrible for all the same reasons.

I would agree with you on almost everything, but the lyrics part. Not all of theirs are like that, but either way the lyrics aren't good anyways.

gottaSCREM · 01-23-2007, 04:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Inuzuka Skysword

Nickelback is defined as grunge......by about every source I know

What are those sources?

ZeppelinAir · 01-23-2007, 06:06 PM

talent is a matter of taste and opinion, i think they have talent, others think they dont, alot of it has to do with taste and opinion.

obviously you have no clue what i all listen to, so dont go and say they influence everything i listen to

Urban Hat€monger ? · 01-23-2007, 07:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZeppelinAir

talent is a matter of taste and opinion,

I really hate people that repeat this constantly.
I don`t see how two sh*tty generic MTV bands can be considered to have talent at all.

Did they do anything original? no.
Did they do anything groundbreaking? no.
Will they be remembered in the future for inspiring people to make interesting & thoughtful music? no.
Do people give a flying f*ck about 'hits' 2 or 3 years down the line? no

Are they bands that churn out middle of the road safe MTV grunge-lite crap that basically sounds like the worst excesses of 80s stadium rock repackaged as 'alternative rock' .......yes.

Seriously , save the word 'talent' for people who deserve it. Yes you do have the right to call anybody you want talented, but at least come up with something better than 'they had some chart hits' for your reasons or you will end up looking very very silly.

sleepy jack · 01-23-2007, 07:15 PM

My thoughts on the "lolz its an opinion!" arguement.

Quote:

Originally Posted by A_Perfect_Sonnet

The South won the civil cause I said so, and that's how I relate the civil war to myself, so it's obviously true, and history can blow me.

Inuzuka Skysword · 01-23-2007, 07:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZeppelinAir

talent is a matter of taste and opinion, i think they have talent, others think they dont, alot of it has to do with taste and opinion.

obviously you have no clue what i all listen to, so dont go and say they influence everything i listen to

Talent is a matter of taste and opinion to those who have a good ear that understands talent. When I listen to people talk about how talented those emo bands are I sit and laugh my butt off because they should not use talent in any sentence if they believe that.

Oh yeah and if you listen to these bands you have just accepted your music was influenced by the Beetles.

01-22-2007, 09:58 PM	#121 (permalink)
ZeppelinAir Long time no see Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: somewhere in Michigan Posts: 512	no no, i was just sayin that me sayin the Beatles suck is matter of my personal opinion, that doesnt mean they do. i was just answering your question that Brittney Spears isnt sucky to someone __________________ not that old signature

01-23-2007, 12:21 AM	#122 (permalink)
jibber Freeskier Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Istanbul was Constantinople now it's Istanbul not Constantinople... Posts: 1,536	they're both sh*tty bands in a huge pile of mediocre musicians fronted by an eddie vedder clone. theory of a dead man, creed, POM, and a ton of others, all sound the same, all have the same formula of catchy, bland lyrics and repetitive riffs. comparing them is like comparing falling to your death or getting shot. You can argue all you want about which is better, but in the end, they both suck horrible for all the same reasons. __________________ What you've done becomes the judge of what you're going to do -- especially in other people's minds. When you're traveling, you are what you are right there and then. People don't have your past to hold against you. No yesterdays on the road. William Least Heat Moon, Blue Highways Your toughest competitor lives in your head. Some days his name is fear, or pain, or gravity. Stomp his ass. HOOKED ON THE WHITE POWDER

01-23-2007, 06:06 PM	#127 (permalink)
ZeppelinAir Long time no see Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: somewhere in Michigan Posts: 512	talent is a matter of taste and opinion, i think they have talent, others think they dont, alot of it has to do with taste and opinion. obviously you have no clue what i all listen to, so dont go and say they influence everything i listen to __________________ not that old signature

01-23-2007, 11:52 AM	#123 (permalink)
~~The Unfan~~ Account Disabled Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Methville Posts: 2,116	Falling beats being shot simply because you get that moment to think "Oh ****! I fell!"