Maiden or Priest (jazz, metal, single, albums, beatles)

Music Is Pwnage · 07-10-2005, 10:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SATCHMO

Yeah, RATM aren't good at all. They're F**king FANTASTIC !

any generic rapper is better than RATM.

SATCHMO · 07-10-2005, 07:03 PM

I don't know about that, but they're definitely better than any generic metal band, besides I don't think that Zach DeLaRocha's focal point was in putting himself over as a rapper, but rather to vocally deliver his anger about the truth of the socio-political system in which we live in a blatantly bold and relentless manner, hence the name: Rage Against the Machine. His primary influence was Chuck D of Public Enemy, One of the most legendary and powerful "rappers" that ever held a microphone, and you can definitely hear it in his work, but I think anyone would be hard pressed to call it imitation. In addition Tom Morello Is probably the most innovative guitarists of this generation. Its one thing to be able to play ten billion notes a second, any metal wanker who focuses hard enough can do that, but to be able to make a guitar sound like a multitude of different instruments takes a degree of talent that most haven't achieved. Put simply RATM is probably the most innovative original bands to come out of the 90's.

Music Is Pwnage · 07-10-2005, 07:04 PM

whatever dude. i hate them. that's all that matters.

EDGE · 07-12-2005, 03:09 AM

its do0d

07-12-2005, 09:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Music Is Pwnage

whatever dude. i hate them. that's all that matters.

not really......

EddyEdwards · 07-13-2005, 05:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Urban Hatemonger

Do you have any sort of clue as to what the hell you are on about?

Im 16, not 40 - I assume your 40.

I've always thought Juda's Preist began in the 1980's and haven't heard much at all about them, I live in Australia and half the people I ask, more I bet - don't know who this band is... Iron Maiden on the other hand are gods.

Urban Hat€monger ? · 07-13-2005, 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EddyEdwards

Im 16, not 40 - I assume your 40.

Nowhere near , if you assume that because I know what i`m talking about I reccommend these things they have , they`re called books & they`re full of useful information.

Quote:

Originally Posted by EddyEdwards

I've always thought Juda's Preist began in the 1980's and haven't heard much at all about them, I live in Australia and half the people I ask, more I bet - don't know who this band is... Iron Maiden on the other hand are gods.

All you had to do was scroll up this thread a bit & read my first post & you`ll see exactly WHY Iron Maiden are more well known these days than Judas Priest.

Honestly does it really hurt to read some infomation before you start crying when i say you`re wrong.

Sneer · 07-13-2005, 02:49 PM

neither band is worth arguing about.

deadkennedysmeetstheclash · 07-14-2005, 05:34 AM

Whoever said that Cobain was better than van Halen needs to be shot. Van halen basiclaly invented hammering on a guitar, he could hammer like no other. yeah, Nirvana had better songwriting but then again there ar emany 80's bands with better songs than nirvana. U2 for instance, Alice Cooper, Queen, AC DC, the Cure..Don't you understand that a lot of 80's stuff was pure gold?? Yeah, a lot of it was cheese like motley crue, bon jovi, posion, but every era has it's achilles heel. 80;s music was better than modern day dribble.. Iron Maiden own Judas Preist. JP were a lot more heavy rock for lengths of thier career than heavy metal, Maiden were always heavy metal. ****inson was eaisly their best singer though..What about metallica?? they were 80's!! Just because wham and lot sof other cheap, horrible bands were around doesn't mean every 80's abnd were bad..Niravana were a lot of rubbish, I am afarid to say, Pearl jam and AIC were far more talented..Niravan kind of killed the talented music playing bit..

07-14-2005, 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by deadkennedysmeetstheclash

80's music was better than modern day dribble..

someones living in the past....

View Poll Results: Iron Maiden or Judas Priest?
Iron Maiden	25	80.65%
Judas Priest	6	19.35%
Voters: 31. You may not vote on this poll

07-13-2005, 02:49 PM	#78 (permalink)
Sneer Let it drip Join Date: Nov 2004 Posts: 5,430	neither band is worth arguing about. __________________ LastFM Sneer's Emporium of Sound Fright Team radio show

07-10-2005, 07:03 PM	#72 (permalink)
SATCHMO Al Dente Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Texas Posts: 4,708	I don't know about that, but they're definitely better than any generic metal band, besides I don't think that Zach DeLaRocha's focal point was in putting himself over as a rapper, but rather to vocally deliver his anger about the truth of the socio-political system in which we live in a blatantly bold and relentless manner, hence the name: Rage Against the Machine. His primary influence was Chuck D of Public Enemy, One of the most legendary and powerful "rappers" that ever held a microphone, and you can definitely hear it in his work, but I think anyone would be hard pressed to call it imitation. In addition Tom Morello Is probably the most innovative guitarists of this generation. Its one thing to be able to play ten billion notes a second, any metal wanker who focuses hard enough can do that, but to be able to make a guitar sound like a multitude of different instruments takes a degree of talent that most haven't achieved. Put simply RATM is probably the most innovative original bands to come out of the 90's.

07-10-2005, 07:04 PM	#73 (permalink)
Music Is Pwnage Follower of The FSM!!!!!! Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Nowhere you've heard of Posts: 285	whatever dude. i hate them. that's all that matters.

07-12-2005, 03:09 AM	#74 (permalink)
EDGE accidental genius Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Boston, MA Posts: 1,161	its do0d

07-14-2005, 05:34 AM	#79 (permalink)
deadkennedysmeetstheclash Music Addict Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 89	Whoever said that Cobain was better than van Halen needs to be shot. Van halen basiclaly invented hammering on a guitar, he could hammer like no other. yeah, Nirvana had better songwriting but then again there ar emany 80's bands with better songs than nirvana. U2 for instance, Alice Cooper, Queen, AC DC, the Cure..Don't you understand that a lot of 80's stuff was pure gold?? Yeah, a lot of it was cheese like motley crue, bon jovi, posion, but every era has it's achilles heel. 80;s music was better than modern day dribble.. Iron Maiden own Judas Preist. JP were a lot more heavy rock for lengths of thier career than heavy metal, Maiden were always heavy metal. ****inson was eaisly their best singer though..What about metallica?? they were 80's!! Just because wham and lot sof other cheap, horrible bands were around doesn't mean every 80's abnd were bad..Niravana were a lot of rubbish, I am afarid to say, Pearl jam and AIC were far more talented..Niravan kind of killed the talented music playing bit..