CoNtrivedNiHilism |
10-08-2014 08:40 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wpnfire
(Post 1494741)
Well the leader for Korn would vehemently disagree with you about them not changing, and Linkin Park practically has no fans anymore because they no longer play the genre.
|
Nine basically said what I was going to about this. John was meaning that bands like his, and others that are still around that were once thought of, or are still thought of as nu-metal bands...how they supposedly changed their sound and aren't what should be called nu-metal anymore. John isn't an idiot...but he's not exactly a music guru either. Either way. Nu-Metal from its hay day years, it was stunted from the start. Not a lot of bands cared to sit their band apart from others in the genre. Got pretty boring.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Janszoon
(Post 1494804)
There are some things I like about nu-metal—like its emphasis on rhythm and the fact that it eschewed the guitar wanking so common in a lot of metal that preceded it—and there is some nu-metal I enjoy—like Soulfly, early Korn and early Papa Roach—but even the stuff I like isn't exactly mind blowing and I find that I rarely listen to it these days.
I'm definitely with you there.
|
I agree man. But there are a lot of people here on the forum, and outside of the forum in our day to day lives that just say nu-metal had absolutely no good qualities about the genre. They're wrong but to each their own...
I listened to early Korn a lot, early Papa Roach a lot...I'd say that I don't really listen to a lot of either band anymore though, what with my change in taste of music as I got older. You ever listen to Simon Says? They were a diamond in the rough in my opinion, as far as a nu-metal band went. They had some neat little qualities to their music that most other nu-metal bands were oblivious to.
|