What do you think of Chinese Democracy?
Guns N' Roses is often times--on and off--within my Top 5 favorite bands. I view the original lineups of the band as the next logical succesors to the torch carried by The Rolling Stones and Aerosmith. Appetite for Destruction is a great rock album, if overrated; Lies is a fun little stop gap; The Use Your Illusions as flawed masterpieces, The Spaghetti Incident is downright fun, a great time. I love their cover of Sympathy for the Devil.
Having followed the history of Chinese Democracy's creation for years, we were led to believe Axl was crafting something truly epic in those years locked away in the studio. Insiders described the album as a mix of the Wall and Physical Graffiti in sound, remixed by Trent Reznor and produced by Beck....As such I came to expect sonic masterpieces, pieces that brought the epic back to rock. Pieces similar to Achille's Last Stand, Queen, and the best of the Wall--an album of epics that would electrify the rock world--An experimental album, a perfect marriage of the clasic Hard Rock sound of the original Guns N' Roses and all the best sounds of the '90s--Grunge, industrial and so on. Ten minute long magnum opuses similar to Estranged and Coma in their complexity. Instead, we got 14 fairly straight forward songs. For all the hype by the media and Axl himself about the album's complexity, it's a fairly straight forward album made artificially complex by adding hundreds of layers upon simple songs. It's a decent album but not at all what I expected. What about you? What do you feel about it? |
The singing style reminded me too much of Avenged Sevenfold and not enough of GnR.
I stopped listening after 10 minutes of trying to hold back the PTSD flashbacks. |
|
I listened to it once when they had it streaming for free when it came out, then never listened to it again. That pretty much sums up my feelings about it.
|
This aint too bad, but then I am a bit biased:
|
I'm all for the people of China having a say in their government.
|
I thought it was massively overproduced. I thought the songs were good but there were too many years of influences from popular culture mixed into the multiple layers of music. I've said before elsewhere that eventually someone will, in the future, take those tapes, and break them down into bare-bones rock tracks and an entirely different album will emerge.
|
I can't believe people still talk about it. Must be that GnR name attached to it, because the music isn't what's keeping it relevant
|
Heard way worse 'comeback albums' from other bands. Also heard a lot better. Album for me had some enjoyable songs, If The World being my favorite and showcased that Axl could still use his voice in a powerful way.
But I'll let people keep talking about how a band isn't relevant anymore but somehow manages to pull in huge revenue with touring once in a blue moon. If people didn't care. Nobody would show up to the shows. It may have took Chinese Democracy a few good years to do it, but it's still a platinum selling record. So stick that in your know it all blow holes and spin on it. The way people look at a bands relevance in the world here on the forum is just odd. Does anyone even know what it means and how to apply it to a band, or anything??? You don't think they have importance so you file them away in irrelevance? Doesn't make sense. Want an example of a proper way to apply irrelevance to a band? Poison. A huge band for a period in the 80's fizzled out in the 90's, then died slowly in the 2000's with spurts of success here and there before people stopped caring enough to keep them around. That didn't happen with GNR, in whatever incarnation Axl Rose resurfaced the band in. You just can't say a band isn't relevant anymore until the demand for them to tour or make any music it all is just plain and simple, gone. The figure of money thrown and Axl and Slash for this somewhat of a classic GNR reunion is ridiculously huge. Irrelevance does not bring forth a check like that folks. That is one hundred percent relevance right there. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
You know I'm right Frownland. I'm completely right. I don't understand though how it is that people that have never really been a fan of some band or whatever, can so easily throw around the word relevant, like at almost anything they don't care much for or hasn't been a band that has continued to tour and have positive interest their entire career. GNR goes away for this long, comes back, puts an album out, goes away for a few years, comes back. Money was involved. But you can't tell me the demand has never been there. It has always been there. You could try telling me that the demand was not from thousands or millions of fans. Just people wanting a nostalgia run. But that wouldn't discredit anything I've said about relevance or GNR. So me being wrong in maybe your eyes if you don't agree, that to me does not make what I said not factual and it also doesn't matter to me. Because like I said. I'm right. I just don't see people applying the term or word relevant correctly a whole lot here to an artist or band. It's used so loosely that I have no other way to view it other than they don't exactly know how to use the term, rather they just enjoy slapping it on whatever they care to and the people that agree with them only enable their behavior to do so. Do I like this band? No. NOT A RELEVANT BAND. That seems to be the thought process. What's relevance to you Frownland? |
And blind nostalgia makes them relevant, not taste or anything of that sort. You asked why anyone would go to their shows and I gave you an answer.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
@CN not really disagreeing with that anywhere in my posts, just taking it as an opportunity to **** on GNR.
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Sh*t on them all you like man. I don't care about that. I'm talking about relevance. Not about how much you think they're sh*t. @Fred And just so it's out there Fred. I like my music with more complexity as well. But I also enjoy the simpler stuff that's out there too. |
*avoids grammar nazi comment with every fiber of his being*
|
Quote:
|
they're
Damn you fixed it before I could check. |
Quote:
Just write it in a really small font. That'd probably be less dickish. EDIT: Sneaky. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I also commented on your post about it though. So I went back and found nothing. Confusion struck. But then I stopped caring due to already fixing the mistake before reading your post about it...so, yeah. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
If you just wanna say that people still like GNR, then fine, obviously they do, but who cares? People like lots of ****ty ****, even years after they should have stopped. |
I'll let you're grammar slide, Fred, because you're not a dick.
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Oh, dear god, no!
|
Quote:
Don't waste time arguing relevance- it's a meaningless term. has nothing to do with the quality of the music or the performance of it. Nada. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
The actual substance of the album is pretty good i.e the lyrics, the melodies. But the production and timbres of the instruments completely ruin it. Axl's voice sounds like its been filtered through windows '95 and the widdly-woo guitar tone on most of the solos is headache inducing. It's a breath of relief any time a piano breaks through the hundreds of layered tracks. What made Appetite (and other bands like Oasis when they first came out) so refreshing was how unashamedly traditional rock n' roll they were. Chinese Democracy is Axl trying to fit the GNR sound through a dozen subgenres that were all long done with by the time the album came out.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:24 PM. |
© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.