The Rolling Stones - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Rock & Metal > Rock N Roll, Classic Rock & 60s Rock
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-29-2011, 02:08 PM   #61 (permalink)
The Sexual Intellectual
 
Urban Hat€monger ?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,605
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mighty Salami View Post
You don't need to say things like that. If he was a prick, why did they keep him in the band for so long?
Because originally it was his band.

You should read Andrew Loog Oldham's autobiography. Jones was given chance after chance after chance to sort himself out, by the end the rest of the band were carrying him. And that was why they eventually got rid of him.
__________________



Urb's RYM Stuff

Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave.
Urban Hat€monger ? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2011, 02:15 PM   #62 (permalink)
Get in ma belly
 
Salami's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 1,385
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Urban Hatemonger View Post
Because originally it was his band.

You should read Andrew Loog Oldham's autobiography. Jones was given chance after chance after chance to sort himself out, by the end the rest of the band were carrying him. And that was why they eventually got rid of him.
I won't deny that he was a really difficult person to get on with! Surely there's some case, though, for him being a great musician? I know he could be a real dick at times, but at the end of the day when we are talking about how musically talented he was, his personal life isn't relevant?
I'm not trying to defend the man, I just think that there must be some things about him that make his comparison with John Paul Jones an interesting one, perhaps especially the fact that John Paul Jones was quite a mild mannered person.
Salami is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2011, 03:17 PM   #63 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
blastingas10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,126
Default

I didn't say anything about him as a person. Nor did I say anything about his songwriting ability. I'm talking about instrumental prowess. And his was very strong. His personal character Is completely irrelevant.
blastingas10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2011, 03:23 PM   #64 (permalink)
Get in ma belly
 
Salami's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 1,385
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blastingas10 View Post
I didn't say anything about him as a person. Nor did I say anything about his songwriting ability. I'm talking about instrumental prowess. And his was very strong. His personal character Is completely irrelevant.
You always turn up and say what I was saying in about half the words yet articulate it a lot better. Sadly Urban has hit the hay for tonight, so we'll have to postpone this argument. We can't be fighting when the mod isn't around.
Salami is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2011, 03:43 PM   #65 (permalink)
Groupie
 
CitySlickCaptain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 15
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mighty Salami View Post
You don't need to say things like that. If he was a prick, why did they keep him in the band for so long? Anyway, the question here is about talent. Both men were good at many different instruments, and this is what the question concerns.
I was just pointing out why he was overshadowed. If we're going to say he was overshadowed, we may as well know why.

He was a nasty little man and I believe it cost him his life.
CitySlickCaptain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2011, 03:44 PM   #66 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
blastingas10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,126
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mighty Salami View Post
You always turn up and say what I was saying in about half the words yet articulate it a lot better. Sadly Urban has hit the hay for tonight, so we'll have to postpone this argument. We can't be fighting when the mod isn't around.
Haha, well you pretty much said all there was to be said. I just felt the need to repeat it.

What he said may be true, but it was a little off topic.
blastingas10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2011, 03:50 PM   #67 (permalink)
The Sexual Intellectual
 
Urban Hat€monger ?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,605
Default

How is it off topic? this is a thread about the Rolling Stones.

If he was too ****ed up to do anything constructive then I would say that his personal life has everything to do with his musical ability.
__________________



Urb's RYM Stuff

Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave.
Urban Hat€monger ? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2011, 03:51 PM   #68 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
blastingas10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,126
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CitySlickCaptain View Post
I was just pointing out why he was overshadowed. If we're going to say he was overshadowed, we may as well know why.

He was a nasty little man and I believe it cost him his life.
You might be right. He just about made a baby everywhere he went and kept moving on, never being a part of their lives. But he did take care of some of his kids I believe. He sold his record collection in order to help take care of one.

But nonetheless, I never said anything about his personal. And even if he wasn't a nasty little man, he still would have been overshadowed.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Urban Hatemonger View Post
How is it off topic? this is a thread about the Rolling Stones.

If he was too ****ed up to do anything constructive then I would say that his personal life has everything to do with his musical ability.
It's a little off topic because I was talking about his ability as a musician, not his personal life. And I disagree, he contributed. He played slide guitar on many songs, organ, marimba, trumpet, appalachian dulcimer, harpischord, accordion, saxaphone, oboe, mellotron, harmonica, and autoharp.

Last edited by blastingas10; 11-29-2011 at 04:02 PM.
blastingas10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2011, 04:24 PM   #69 (permalink)
Groupie
 
CitySlickCaptain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 15
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blastingas10 View Post
What he said may be true, but it was a little off topic.
Not really because it was implied that Brian was overshadowed because of his playing abilities, which simply wasn't the case. He was a much more talented musician than Keith.
CitySlickCaptain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2011, 04:35 PM   #70 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
blastingas10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,126
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CitySlickCaptain View Post
Not really because it was implied that Brian was overshadowed because of his playing abilities, which simply wasn't the case. He was a much more talented musician than Keith.
How was that implied? I just said he was overshadowed. He certainly was. Jagger is always going to overshadow him even though he was way more talented in his 27 years than Mick will ever be. Maybe it was implied by someone else, but not by me. I've always seen Brian as the most talented member. At least when it comes to instrumental ability.
blastingas10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.