Bob Dylan Vs Neil Young - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Rock & Metal > Rock N Roll, Classic Rock & 60s Rock
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-27-2011, 02:28 PM   #31 (permalink)
Groupie
 
newmen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 46
Default

dylans songs changed a generation, they were at the figure head of new movement during the early to mid sixties, hell he even played after martin luther kings speech. at that monolith thing near whitehouse with all those people gathered there.
His songs are timeless and whilst he produced alot of crap songs he also produced some of the best songs ever written. The number of times blowin in the wind was covered is insane. I think its unfair to compare neil young to the most influencial musical artist of the last century. He is undoubtedly mroe refrenced as being an inspriation to musicsians and celebrities in general over the beatles and even elvis.
newmen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2011, 04:22 PM   #32 (permalink)
Buzz Killjoy
 
BastardofYoung's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,692
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by newmen View Post
dylans songs changed a generation, they were at the figure head of new movement during the early to mid sixties, hell he even played after martin luther kings speech. at that monolith thing near whitehouse with all those people gathered there.
His songs are timeless and whilst he produced alot of crap songs he also produced some of the best songs ever written. The number of times blowin in the wind was covered is insane. I think its unfair to compare neil young to the most influencial musical artist of the last century. He is undoubtedly mroe refrenced as being an inspriation to musicsians and celebrities in general over the beatles and even elvis.
Well, I think saying Bob is THE most influential artist of the last century is pretty debatable. He is one of them, but I would not go as far as to say he is THE most influential.
__________________
last.fm

‎"I hope that someday we will be able to put away our fears and prejudices and just laugh at people." - Jack Handey.
BastardofYoung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2011, 06:24 PM   #33 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,538
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BastardofYoung View Post
Well, I think saying Bob is THE most influential artist of the last century is pretty debatable. He is one of them, but I would not go as far as to say he is THE most influential.
It's not infeasible to me, Like a Rolling Stone was pretty revolutionary. I'm a little unsure of it, but I could definitely see it.
someonecompletelyrandom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2011, 12:05 AM   #34 (permalink)
Groupie
 
newmen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 46
Default

i think the difference between bob dylan and 99% of other artists is that he came at exactly the right time, people dont understand the times that he appeared on the scene of music. He was only 20, he couldnt really sing and he was singing folk music. Something that was never played on the main radio stations and never signed to major labels. Dylan was the first folk singer to sign onto a large label like Columbia records. He was also the first popular artist that would admit he couldnt sing, giving hope to those who couldnt also sing but could play instruments or had something to say.

His music at first was political, yet he was not a political person. During the early 60s few artists spoke out against the goverment and nobody had whilst signed to a major label until dylan came along. During those times racisim was a big problem in america and Dylan was one of the figure heads against it, many couldnt understand why a young white boy was singing for equal rights.

I think the main difference here is the world of music would be a very different place today without dylan. However if you take away neil young (a very talented artist) i doubt it would be all that different Regardless of what your individual tastes are theres no denying dylan is up there with both elvis and john lennon.
Its just a shame that alot of people who dont know about what dylan did during the 60s and 70s will only find out once he dies and hes all over the news once again
a sample of people i know were influenced by dylan during their careers..
Jimi hendrix, wyclef jean, syd barret, john lennon, paul mcartney, johnny cash, paul simon

Last edited by newmen; 06-28-2011 at 12:28 AM.
newmen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2011, 12:15 AM   #35 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,538
Default

Nice, informative post there. It'll be a very sad day when he dies.
someonecompletelyrandom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2011, 06:55 PM   #36 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
William Zanzinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: The Wasteland
Posts: 77
Default

Neil is great, but he just is not in the same league as Dylan.
To put his career into perspective, you have to realise that in 1965 or thereabouts, at the (then) peak of his career as a folk singer, he turned his back on his core audience.
Dylan didn`t "sell out"-work such as "Like a rolling stone" or "It`s alright Ma" were totally uncommercial.
It was like nothing else which had gone before-to this day, I consider lyrics like-

"Disillusioned words like bullets bark
As human gods aim for their mark
Make everything from toy guns that spark
To flesh-colored Christs that glow in the dark
It’s easy to see without looking too far
That not much is really sacred"
- to be both relevant and ground breaking.
(From the same song-"He not busy being born is busy dying"!)

It`s not a fair comparison-Neil is a brilliant singer/songwriter.
Dylan is a genius.
William Zanzinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2011, 06:56 PM   #37 (permalink)
Live by the Sword
 
Howard the Duck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Posts: 9,075
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by William Zanzinger View Post
Neil is great, but he just is not in the same league as Dylan.
To put his career into perspective, you have to realise that in 1965 or thereabouts, at the (then) peak of his career as a folk singer, he turned his back on his core audience.
Dylan didn`t "sell out"-work such as "Like a rolling stone" or "It`s alright Ma" were totally uncommercial.
It was like nothing else which had gone before-to this day, I consider lyrics like-

"Disillusioned words like bullets bark
As human gods aim for their mark
Make everything from toy guns that spark
To flesh-colored Christs that glow in the dark
It’s easy to see without looking too far
That not much is really sacred"
- to be both relevant and ground breaking.
(From the same song-"He not busy being born is busy dying"!)

It`s not a fair comparison-Neil is a brilliant singer/songwriter.
Dylan is a genius.
it would if it made any sense
__________________


Malaise is THE dominant human predilection.

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Virgin View Post
what? i don't understand you. farming is for vegetables, not for meat. if ou disagree with a farming practice, you disagree on a vegetable. unless you have a different definition of farming.
Howard the Duck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2011, 07:09 PM   #38 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
William Zanzinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: The Wasteland
Posts: 77
Default

Well, usually interpreted as an attack on commericalism, the insincerity of politicians and the corruption of religion, it`s generally acknowledged as reasonably sensible.
Can you name anything comparable?
Maybe you prefer Gary Glitter?
William Zanzinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2011, 07:50 PM   #39 (permalink)
Live by the Sword
 
Howard the Duck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Posts: 9,075
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by William Zanzinger View Post
Well, usually interpreted as an attack on commericalism, the insincerity of politicians and the corruption of religion, it`s generally acknowledged as reasonably sensible.
Can you name anything comparable?
Maybe you prefer Gary Glitter?
just like anything in the Bible, anybody can ascribe any kind of meaning to it

like when I was so into The Wall, I came up with a million explanations of the lyrics

at the end, i came to the conclusion it's just about Roger masturbating, and The Wall is the bathroom wall blocking him from his mother's view
__________________


Malaise is THE dominant human predilection.

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Virgin View Post
what? i don't understand you. farming is for vegetables, not for meat. if ou disagree with a farming practice, you disagree on a vegetable. unless you have a different definition of farming.
Howard the Duck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2011, 07:53 PM   #40 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
William Zanzinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: The Wasteland
Posts: 77
Default

Yup.Just like the Bible.
William Zanzinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.