10 Reasons Why The Rolling Stones Were Better Than The Beatles (lyrics, blues) - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Rock & Metal > Rock N Roll, Classic Rock & 60s Rock
10 Reasons Why The Rolling Stones Were Better Than The Beatles 10 Reasons Why The Rolling Stones Were Better Than The Beatles (lyrics, blues)
Register Blogging Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
Page 20 of 60 « First 101819 20 212230 Last »
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-17-2008, 10:26 PM   #191 (permalink)
dac
MB's Biggest Fanboy
 
dac's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Cloud Cuckoo Land
Posts: 2,852
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Urban Hatemonger View Post
1. Keith Richards , coolest guitarist on the planet

2. Mick Jagger , greatest frontman of all time

3. Yoko Ono or Marianne Faithful ,back in the 60s who would you rather have been seen on the arm with ?
how is that not an opinion?

but seriously if one wants to prove the stones were better you're not convincing anyone with points like that^... otherwise its just trolling
__________________
dac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2008, 10:33 PM   #192 (permalink)
Unrepentant Ass-Mod
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,921
Default
Lols. Of course its subjective. When Urban made the thread he knew there would be a lotta backlash so he used off-banter reasons rather than creating a retardedly long argument. If you wanna argue with him, go for it. But he certainly wasn't trying to convince you of anything.
__________________
first.am
lucifer_sam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2008, 10:45 PM   #193 (permalink)
Reformed Jackass
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,964
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by dac View Post
how is that not an opinion?

but seriously if one wants to prove the stones were better you're not convincing anyone with points like that^... otherwise its just trolling
Cat got your sense of humor?
ProggyMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2008, 11:52 AM   #194 (permalink)
The Sexual Intellectual
 
Urban Hat€monger ?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,605
Default
Another one fell for it
__________________



Urb's RYM Stuff

Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave.
Urban Hat€monger ? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2008, 10:03 PM   #195 (permalink)
Meanie McFeany
 
Wifey Boozer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Troy side'ah the dirt, NY
Posts: 455
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by dac View Post
how is that not an opinion?

but seriously if one wants to prove the stones were better you're not convincing anyone with points like that^... otherwise its just trolling
Dude, didja not hear me? A debate is several conflicting opinions constructed in an intelligent way (that can be comical, depending on the individuals in which are partaking in thee debate). No one can prove anything, ever. It's all subjective. That's the point. If it bothers you, don't take part in it. Don't try to change the world with posts.
__________________


... Stalin had a FANTASTIC moustache.

Formerly known as the Prime Minister of Spain.

[backintheubbr]
Wifey Boozer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2008, 03:37 AM   #196 (permalink)
Later on...
 
FireInCairo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,235
Default
the beatles were a pop band
basically the same as one of todays boy bands...
their image and early sound was dictated by their manager
and all the experimentalism that they are purported as having pioneered was already old news it was just popularised by them.
Vs
the stones
maybe less experimental but definitely twee free
just a really good rock band
a logical progression
__________________
O G MUDBONE: Only You can prevent forest fires.
FireInCairo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2008, 08:00 AM   #197 (permalink)
sleepe
 
Double X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: boston
Posts: 1,140
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by FireInCairo View Post
the beatles were a pop band
basically the same as one of todays boy bands...
their image and early sound was dictated by their manager
and all the experimentalism that they are purported as having pioneered was already old news it was just popularised by them.
Vs
the stones
maybe less experimental but definitely twee free
just a really good rock band
a logical progression
Except no boy band could ever write as a good lyrics as the Beatles did. And there manager was pretty smart then because 'Help!' and 'Hard Day's Night' are very good albums.

Beatles used the 'old news' and did it better than anyone else and the time, even the creators.
Double X is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2008, 06:27 PM   #198 (permalink)
Later on...
 
FireInCairo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,235
Default
dressed up nursery rhymes about psychedelic drugs and pop songs about holding hands....
towards the end they were a bit more interesting
i love abbey road
but the majority of their catalogue bores me

you're point about their "old news" being used better is valid, but still, they shouldnt be credited with it for experimentalism.
__________________
O G MUDBONE: Only You can prevent forest fires.
FireInCairo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2008, 07:41 PM   #199 (permalink)
The Stain Specialist
 
WeeLittleHobbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Maryland
Posts: 312
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by FireInCairo View Post
dressed up nursery rhymes about psychedelic drugs and pop songs about holding hands....
towards the end they were a bit more interesting
i love abbey road
but the majority of their catalogue bores me

you're point about their "old news" being used better is valid, but still, they shouldnt be credited with it for experimentalism.

You love Abbey Road AND hate the Beatles? That's a little conflicting, is it not?
__________________
Tommy: I'm funny how? Funny like a clown? I amuse you? I'm here to f*cking amuse you? What do you mean, funny? How am I funny?
Henry: You know, how you tell a story.
Tommy: I don't know. You said it. You said I'm funny. How am I funny?
WeeLittleHobbit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2008, 07:48 PM   #200 (permalink)
Later on...
 
FireInCairo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,235
Default
thats the exception...
i hate the majority of their catalogue
__________________
O G MUDBONE: Only You can prevent forest fires.
FireInCairo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 20 of 60 « First 101819 20 212230 Last »

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Similar Threads


Terms & Privacy - Contact Us - Music Banter - Archive - Top

© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.