|
|||||||
| Register | Blogging | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| View Poll Results: Which vocalist do you prefer? | |||
| Bon Scott |
|
55 | 79.71% |
| Brian Johnson |
|
14 | 20.29% |
| Voters: 69. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#35 (permalink) |
|
Groupie
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 14
|
As an Australian this is a huge topic, best export we ever had musically :P
Personally I do think Bon Scott has to take it, he was the original and AC/DC would never have happened without him but in saying that I quite like Brian. AC/DC wouldnt have existed or become the phenominon they are today without them |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 (permalink) | |
|
\/ GOD
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Nowhere...
Posts: 2,179
|
Quote:
Bon Scott just for that whole grunty voice going "Done Dirt Cheap" is one of the most awesome noises ever created with human voice. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 (permalink) | |
|
Divination
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,655
|
Quote:
."Dirty Deeds, And They're Done Dirt Cheap!". .
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 (permalink) |
|
Groupie
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cairns, Australia
Posts: 33
|
For me I just bring up the two albums that I think define both eras.
For Bon: T.N.T. For BJ: Back in Black. For me there is no contest. I prefer T.N.T over Back in Black. Also Bon always sounded passionate about what he was doing and could put on a way better show. Bon Scott it is. |
|
|
|
|
|
#40 (permalink) |
|
killedmyraindog
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Posts: 11,246
|
This is one of those sucky comparisons because Scott had the better voice but Johnson sang on the better material (imo). I couldn't ever choose.
__________________
I've moved to a new address |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|