- - The Rolling Stones vs. The Beatles
(https://www.musicbanter.com/rock-n-roll-classic-rock-60s-rock/8302-rolling-stones-vs-beatles.html)
Neapolitan
07-08-2009 10:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmfmr
(Post 699289)
Stones are genious, Beatles are a band of pussy boys, but they dont sound bad.
Do you mean The Beatles are a band of Teddy Boys?
Gavin B.
07-08-2009 11:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmfmr
(Post 699289)
Stones are genious, Beatles are a band of pussy boys, but they dont sound bad. Anyway, Stones are the best band ever, they own Beatles alot, they bold much better the rock songs and they still do it, all generations love them and they continue spreading magic, they will rock till the day they die, for sure
And the Who owned the Stones when both bands were in their prime. Watch the documentary Rock and Roll Circus where the Who blew the Stones away when they both played on the same television special live. In fact the Stones looked so bad compared to the Who that they shelved the project and didn't release the video of the show for 25 years.
I posted each band's performance so you can see it for yourself.
The Who: The Who always gave a great performance even if the song was A Quick One, which kinda sucked. The Who always had difficult time finding a decent band to play on the same bill with them because no matter what band it was, the Who would always blow the other acts away. I went to a Who show in 1969 in St. Louis and the newly formed Led Zeppelin backed out of the top billing on the show because the Who was blowing them off the stage night after night on the tour. The only band that ever managed to look good on the same bill with the Who was the Jimi Hendrix Experience in 1967 at Monterey.
The Stones: Except for Keith it looked like the entire band wanted to be somewhere else. Brian Jones already looks dead and actually died a few months after this performance which was his last with the Rolling Stones. They're playing Jumping Jack Flash which was their take no prisoners song in 1968. I saw them the following year after Mick Taylor replaced Brian Jones on guitar and they were playing with a lot more passion and a sense of vision than this half baked performance.
boo boo
07-09-2009 01:30 AM
The Beatles > The Who > The Kinks >>> The Stones
Neapolitan
07-09-2009 09:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by boo boo
(Post 700888)
The Beatles > The Who > The Kinks >>> The Stones
The Beatles = The Rolling Stones > The Yardbirds > The Kinks > The Dave Clark 5 > The Hollies > The Tremolos >>> The Bee Gees >>>>>> The Who
boo boo
07-09-2009 09:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neapolitan
(Post 701276)
The Beatles = The Rolling Stones > The Yardbirds > The Kinks > The Dave Clark 5 > The Hollies > The Tremolos >>> The Bee Gees >>>>>> The Who
No.... just, no.
Son of JayJamJah
07-09-2009 10:57 PM
The Who>St. Elmo's Fire>Tickle Me Elmo>Apathy>Rabies>Herpes>Al Sharpton> This Thread Still getting more hits then any Members Journal or Editors Picks.
crash_override
07-11-2009 02:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by boo boo
(Post 700888)
The Beatles > The Who > The Kinks >>> The Stones
This. I couldn't have drawn it up better myself.
Neapolitan
07-11-2009 01:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by boo boo
(Post 701288)
No.... just, no.
Boo,
How about if I add them together, and throw in STP, would you agree then?
The Beatles = The Rolling Stones > The Yardbirds > The Kinks > The Dave Clark 5 > The Hollies > The Tremolos >>> The Bee Gees >>>>>>Stone Temple Pilots>>>>>>The Who>St. Elmo's Fire>Tickle Me Elmo>Apathy>Rabies>Herpes>Al Sharpton> This Thread Still getting more hits then any Members Journal or Editors Picks