Music Banter
Page 83 of 85 « First 33738182 83 8485
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Music Banter (https://www.musicbanter.com/)
-   Rock N Roll, Classic Rock & 60s Rock (https://www.musicbanter.com/rock-n-roll-classic-rock-60s-rock/)
-   -   The Rolling Stones vs. The Beatles (https://www.musicbanter.com/rock-n-roll-classic-rock-60s-rock/8302-rolling-stones-vs-beatles.html)

khfreek 07-11-2009 04:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vote With A Bullet (Post 702179)
^ I was just wondering that, and so many people in favour of the Stones as well which is interesting.

I think Beatles cultural impact that transcended their music gives them much more merit than the Stones. However, that's just my opinion.
lul

A mod changed the results because this thread was getting stale, I believe.

Vote With A Bullet 07-11-2009 04:05 PM
Oh fair enough. He was a Stones fan then, I take it lol.

Dr.Seussicide 07-11-2009 04:08 PM
Yeah, I know what you mean, I kinda prefer The Beatles over the Stones, but that's just my opinion. Even rolling stones magazine gives Beatles their props. Four of their albums in the top 10 albums of all time, including the number one spot with Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band...gotta count for something. Plus number one greatest artist of all time. Even the number one spot for best songwriting duos ever... then again, people would say the rolling stones magazine ****ride The Beatles over The Rolling Stones...oh the irony...

Dr.Seussicide 07-11-2009 04:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by khfreek (Post 702182)
lul

A mod changed the results becuse this thread was getting stale, I believe.
Seriously? Lol... ah well XD

Neapolitan 07-12-2009 09:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr.Seussicide (Post 702184)
Even rolling stones magazine gives Beatles their props.... then again, people would say the rolling stones magazine ****ride The Beatles over The Rolling Stones...oh the irony...
The magazine is called "Rolling Stone"
The band is called "The Rolling Stones"
one has nothing to do with the other...oh the irony...

Dr.Seussicide 07-12-2009 09:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neapolitan (Post 702670)
The magazine is called "Rolling Stone"
The band is called "The Rolling Stones"
one has nothing to do with the other...oh the irony...
Hmmm... then maybe it's name has absolutely no connection with the band... even despite the magazine coming under publication in the late 1960's... and the fact that one of Jann Wenner's heroes was Mick Jagger... oh well

boo boo 07-13-2009 08:03 AM
Urban changed the Stones to 1,000,068 or whatever it was, and then I changed the Beatles to match but be one vote higher, and then he changed the Stones to what it is now.

Fanboism at it's worst. :laughing:

Urban Hat€monger ? 07-13-2009 11:05 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by boo boo (Post 702841)
Urban changed the Stones to 1,000,068 or whatever it was, and then I changed the Beatles to match but be one vote higher, and then he changed the Stones to what it is now.

Fanboism at it's worst. :laughing:
Actually it wasn't me the 2nd time

annapurna 07-13-2009 05:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr.Seussicide (Post 702683)
Hmmm... then maybe it's name has absolutely no connection with the band... even despite the magazine coming under publication in the late 1960's... and the fact that one of Jann Wenner's heroes was Mick Jagger... oh well
The magazine and the band got their name from the Muddy Water's song "Rollin' Stone."

Dr.Seussicide 07-13-2009 06:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by annapurna (Post 703095)
The magazine and the band got their name from the Muddy Water's song "Rollin' Stone."
Oh ok


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:52 PM.
Page 83 of 85 « First 33738182 83 8485
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page


© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.