Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Rock & Metal > Rock N Roll, Classic Rock & 60s Rock
Register Blogging Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

View Poll Results: Classic Aerosmith(1973-1977) or classic Rolling Stones(1966-1973)?
Aerosmith (Aerosmith - Draw the Line) 3 13.04%
Rolling Stones (Aftermath - Goats Head Soup) 20 86.96%
Voters: 23. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-11-2017, 05:23 PM   #41 (permalink)
stay the |fvck| inside
 
Frownland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: North of Antarctica
Posts: 33,176
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chula Vista View Post
Nothing.
Phew, good. I was afraid that I just cost myself some sweet payola.
__________________
At a time like this, scorching irony, not convincing argument, is needed.

Frownland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2017, 05:24 PM   #42 (permalink)
.
 
grindy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: .
Posts: 6,791
Default

I'll never smug again.
__________________
A smell of petroleum prevails throughout.
grindy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2017, 05:24 PM   #43 (permalink)
stay the |fvck| inside
 
Frownland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: North of Antarctica
Posts: 33,176
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Plankton View Post
Amateurs.
The period that abbreviates credibility works doubly as a period, so expanding that was unnecessary. I considered it, though.
__________________
At a time like this, scorching irony, not convincing argument, is needed.

Frownland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2017, 05:25 PM   #44 (permalink)
Just Keep Swimming...
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: See signature...
Posts: 5,480
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frownland View Post
The period that abbreviates credibility works doubly as a period, so expanding that was unnecessary. I considered it, though.
shut up Your a period

Edited for effect
__________________
See location...
Plankton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2017, 05:25 PM   #45 (permalink)
Toasted Poster
 
Chula Vista's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: SoCal by way of Boston
Posts: 11,010
Default

Godwin's Law run completely amok.
__________________
General Rules:
• While debating and discussion is fine, we will not tolerate rudeness, insulting posts, personal attacks, trolling, purposeless inflammatory posts or members deliberately provoking another member into committing any of these acts. - Mods exempt.
Chula Vista is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2017, 05:31 PM   #46 (permalink)
.
 
grindy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: .
Posts: 6,791
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chula Vista View Post
Godwin's Law run completely amok.
Wrong grammar, wrong understanding of Godwin's law.
__________________
A smell of petroleum prevails throughout.
grindy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2017, 05:34 PM   #47 (permalink)
stay the |fvck| inside
 
Frownland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: North of Antarctica
Posts: 33,176
Default

Ja, I think it's the HuffPo law that says that as an online discussion grows longer, the probability of becoming a Nazi increases greatly. Godwin's law says that as an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Hitler approaches. Big difference.
__________________
At a time like this, scorching irony, not convincing argument, is needed.

Frownland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2017, 05:39 PM   #48 (permalink)
.
 
grindy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: .
Posts: 6,791
Default

And someone ran it amok.
__________________
A smell of petroleum prevails throughout.
grindy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2017, 06:06 PM   #49 (permalink)
Just Keep Swimming...
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: See signature...
Posts: 5,480
Default

And if you look at 'amok' closely, it's a spoonerism for "I am a Grammer Natzy and I amok with that".
__________________
See location...
Plankton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2017, 06:11 PM   #50 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Colorado
Posts: 480
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rubber soul View Post
This one's too easy. That's like saying who's better, the Beatles or Freddie and the Dreamers.


I voted Stones. I used to probably actually like Aerosmith just as much when all I was listening to was classic rock radio, but my opinion of them has faded probably as much as any other band that I've ever listened to. I can tolerate them, and that's about the best I can say about any of their songs at this point is that they're tolerable. Sweet Emotion is an alright song, but I've heard it so many times and I've listened to so much stuff that's better in the last 8 years of my life that I just don't care too much for it.

The Rolling Stones have actually become better in my eyes (or ears?) as I've gotten older. Albums like Now, 12x5, Aftermath, Beggars Banquet, Let It Bleed, and even in the 70s with Sticky Fingers, Exile, Goats Head and Some Girls, they made albums that I can come back to and play all the way through again and again. Goat's Head Soup isn't my favorite but it's not a bad album by any means.
Maajo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads



© 2003-2020 Advameg, Inc.