NHL Thread - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > Community Center > Sport & Recreation
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 06-10-2014, 04:34 PM   #11 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Thom Yorke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,848
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ninetales View Post
Why is it always stats vs watch the games as if theyre mutually exclusive. It's like you think i just read spreadsheets and have never seen a game in my life.

I think what makes people love quick so much is the way he makes saves. He's very good at extending across the crease and making saves that look incredible whereas Rask or Lundqvist make them look more routine. Just a theory but Quick is more likely to make a highlight real save than the other two, but that doesnt mean hes better.

I havent been able to see a lick of these finals unfortunately, so I cant really comment on it, but no generally I wont change my opinion of a player based on 1 shutout they had. Anyone can look good in small sample sizes.
That's how Quick plays though. While Rask/Lundqvist shouldn't be discredited for being positional goalies, Quick shouldn't be criticized for being aggressive. For Quick, that's what it's all about, coupled with using his unbelievable lateral movement to cover up for being so far out. Either way though, Quick is just way better when it matters most. Lundqvist and Rask have a reputation for fizzling out, whereas Quick elevates his game.
Thom Yorke is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Similar Threads



© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.