Music Banter

Music Banter (https://www.musicbanter.com/)
-   Sport & Recreation (https://www.musicbanter.com/sport-recreation/)
-   -   The BCS (https://www.musicbanter.com/sport-recreation/34250-bcs.html)

ProggyMan 10-04-2009 07:58 PM

1. I think Cal bounced back reasonably well from their awful performance against Oregon, they were just outmanned.
2. Auburn is for real.
3. Next year is Boise State's year for a legit title run, barring every other team in the country losing two games they have no shot. But next year they return twenty starters and have two OOC games against what should be very good teams from BCS conferences (Va. Tech and Oregon State).
4. Miami and Oklahoma are both not very good.
5. The Big Ten is awful. See Iowa barely beating Arkansas State a week after crushing PSU. OSU looks to be trending up though (So long as they get rid of Pryor).
6. The SEC has two top 10 teams this year, the Tide and the Gators. But they might just be the top two squads in the country.
7. BSU is lucky they got Oregon week 1.
8. Notre Dame is looking at 9-3 with losses to USC and...Stanford.
9. The only legit team in the MWC this year is TCU.
10. Texas isn't that good. I think they lose two game in the regular season.
11. The Big 12 is probably tied with the Pac-10 for second best conference.
12. Virginia Tech and the ACC as a whole are frauds. Isn't that the Duke team that lost to Richmond?
13. LSU is gonna prove a lot of people, in a bad way.

gotjuice 10-05-2009 12:14 AM

I did not know Boise State plays Virginia Tech next year. Virtual home game for Virginia Tech, last time BSU went on the road versus a major opponent it didn't wind up too well for them (stomped by Georgia between the hedges). That should be a great game though. My major beef with the non-BCS teams is that they don't schedule anybody pre-conference (and I know the argument about it being a lose-lose for a major conference team, but that's obviously being proven false), it's good to see teams like BYU and BSU trying to buck that trend. If you want to be able to say you deserve to play for a title, you have to play some solid teams outside of your conference.

IamAlejo 10-05-2009 01:18 AM

VT was bound for a let down game...and the score to that game was much closer than it actually was. In fact we got the passing game together a bit which is a positive moving forward. When you play Alabama, NU, and Miami in 3 out of 4 before hand and head down to Durham it's going to be a let down [especially with a young team].

We lose virtually nothing next year as long as Worilds stays...Boise will be in big trouble. Last time we played in DC we had USC on the ropes til a completely horrible phantom offensive pass interference call. Carroll called it the loudest environment he's ever been in. We're loud when we fit 65,000 in at Lane. When we go 100,000+, we'll be giving Boise nightmares.

YouTube - Hokies Entrance vs. USC

Proggy you are way too high on the Pac-10. That's soft football all the way around outside of SC.

ProggyMan 10-05-2009 08:24 PM

Something tells me you haven't seen UCLA, Stanford, Arizona, Arizona State, Oregon, Oregon State and Washington play.

IamAlejo 10-05-2009 10:12 PM

I've seen all those except Arizona and Stanford play.

ProggyMan 10-05-2009 10:55 PM

Ok, explain how they're soft.

debaserr 10-14-2009 02:59 PM

I think Alabama and Florida are the best teams in the country. Hopefully they run the table and meet in the SEC championship AND BCS Title game. This would require no other team but them to run the table either(save boise/tcu). We'll see.

ProggyMan 10-14-2009 08:09 PM

Nah, USC gets in against the loser if they win out.

debaserr 10-14-2009 09:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ProggyMan (Post 752505)
Nah, USC gets in against the loser if they win out.

and that would be bull****e

ProggyMan 10-14-2009 09:53 PM

Why? USC's schedule would be twice as difficult as Florida's.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:41 PM.


© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.