Great Debate: Are eSports sports? - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > Community Center > Sport & Recreation
Register Blogging Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-18-2012, 07:09 AM   #101 (permalink)
killedmyraindog
 
TheBig3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Posts: 11,172
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBig3 View Post
You know the more I thought about the "definition" argument, the more I realized it didn't make any sense. Given that we say things like "old sport" and "Give it a sporting chance", the word doesn't seem to really come from actions as we'd define it today.

So then I asked my old friend entomology about it and he said:

[Middle English sporte, short for disporte, from Old French desport, pleasure, from desporter, to divert; see disport.]

Which loosely translated means eSports are the very definition of sport.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MoonlitSunshine View Post
It's probably worth noting that if one takes pure etymological meaning, one also has to take etymological context. The word sport initially found its meaning before there were computers, so the ability for high mental exertion without physical exertion was relatively limited - there was no need when the word was defined to include or exclude activities you don't even have to stand up for or more your hands more than a foot (or even your feet) for hours on end. Personally, I do not consider bar games like snooker or darts sports, but there is an argument for them being included, based on the dual-meaning of sport.

Sport, as a word, carries two connotations. The first is the physical exertion that has been mentioned so many times. Now, sport is an ever evolving word, and as I've already shown initial definitions can lose context in modern society, so it does not always work to simply apply the definition and have at. In this case, the simple fact that one has to argue that the definition technically doesn't exclude eSports as sports makes it abundantly clear that, for the average person, the old definition of sports doesn't really hold. How is this "lay-person definition" defined? Who knows! One thing seems to stand out though, and that is that playing sports is good for your general fitness and improves the wellbeing of your body. eSports on the other hand are almost entirely mental activities - yes, they do require some physical ability at high levels, but there is a reason why the greatest Startcraft players do not have well-toned bodies at peak fitness.

The second meaning of sport however, seems to relate to competitiveness. At a fundamental level, anything with rules that people initially play for fun is a Game. Once it becomes competitive, it starts changing into a "Sport". So using competitiveness as a marker, eSports, Darts and Snooker are all most certainly sports.

Where does this leave us? Possibly, some redefinitions are needed. It is true that eSports need a moniker that differentiate them from couch gaming for fun - there are untold levels of skill and dedication between them. "eSports" in itself carries derogatory tones, and such new word or adaptation would then for me include other "games" played at professional level, like Chess, Darts and Snooker.

At the same time, the meaning of the word Sport as something you can tell people to do that's fun but also increases their general physical wellbeing and health needs to be preserved - I would be entirely against the branding of eSports as Sports because of the excuses it would then bring to rise. With a new word to define the competitive aspect, the subset of competitive games which are considered physically (and probably more accurately, cardio-vascularly) exerting enough to be defined a Sport by the lay-person can remain defined so, thus preventing a perversion of an old word applied to new contexts.


As an aside, I can totally understand why one would want to remove the stigma of "eSports" from something which does require a lot of skill and training of (a veeeeeeery small amount of) muscles. IF it is being done to professionally justify their playing. NOT if it is being done in order to justify the replacement of other "Sports" in the regimen of well-being.
I agree with you Sunshine.

Also, it auto-corrected to entomology though this obviously isn't about bugs.
TheBig3 is offline  
Old 04-18-2012, 08:10 AM   #102 (permalink)
D-D-D-D-D-DROP THE BASS!
 
GuitarBizarre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,730
Default

I'm not sure I really agree on a minor point here. I think you're mostly right, but I don't see why we shouldn't integrate low impact sports into the general definition of sports, and simply recognise them as a low impact, low physical exertion subcategory. I don't think its much of an argument to redefine a term like sports in order to exclude a thing that has all the qualifying criteria but is applying them in a new fashion.


I don't see a stigma to the word eSports. I think its a fine name for them, I just think they should be thought of as a subsection of traditional sports rather than a separate thing entirely.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pedestrian View Post
As for me, my inbox is as of yet testicle-free, and hopefully remains that way. Don't the rest of you get any ideas.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trollheart View Post
I'll have you know, my ancestors were Kings of Wicklow! We're as Irish as losing a three-nil lead in a must-win fixture!
GuitarBizarre is offline  
Old 04-18-2012, 08:44 AM   #103 (permalink)
killedmyraindog
 
TheBig3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Posts: 11,172
Default

eSport to me says "This is equally as worthless as regular sports, we just do these electronically."

All sports are games - they exist to pass the time. We've just found a market for them at the highest level. eSports, too, are pastimes and now, at the highest level, people are making money.

We've just got a century of human-livestock equating sports with a 21st version of a 15th century war. I don't mind that they did that, but they don't have domain over the word.
TheBig3 is offline  
Old 04-18-2012, 08:53 AM   #104 (permalink)
Dat's Der Bunny!
 
MoonlitSunshine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,088
Default

I wouldn't integrate them, because they aren't a subsection of traditional sport. In many ways, they are a separate thing entirely, as different as Chess and Boxing. Like I was saying, the only reason they could be considered a "sport" is to distinguish the professionally played form from the amateur "game". So why not remove the ambiguity, and re-brand that alternate, second definition of sport to a word that everyone can then agree on as NOT having any connotations of physical exercise and fitness?

Sport as a word already has a plethora of meanings, as is evident by this thread, it already has connotations that go far beyond the definition. Why make it more confusing by trying to extend it, when it could be simplified?

Similarly, why is it so necessary that eSports be given the same Title as physical Sports?
__________________
"I found it eventually, at the bottom of a locker in a disused laboratory, with a sign on the door saying "Beware of the Leopard". Ever thought of going into Advertising?"

- Arthur Dent
MoonlitSunshine is offline  
Old 04-18-2012, 09:15 AM   #105 (permalink)
D-D-D-D-D-DROP THE BASS!
 
GuitarBizarre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,730
Default

Because its the seperation, not the differentiation, that leads to the kind of bullcrap attempts to delegitimise the concept of eSports that we've seen in this thread. At the very least if we could agree they were a subcategory, that **** could be pointed towards a rather more simple end result than the 11 page thread we've had to go through here, and we wouldn't have to deal with people like Il Duce, the worst poster ever, trying to troll by bringing up **** that very clearly has nothing to do with any of this discussion. We'd end up a much more inclusive end result where people can do what they want and nobody need get butthurt about the lack of x thing or y aspect in a given sport, (And in so doing, people would be less likely to argue that recognised sports like curling, darts, snooker, and chess, aren't sports), because it would be understood that the umbrella covers one set of stipulations, and the subcategories the others.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pedestrian View Post
As for me, my inbox is as of yet testicle-free, and hopefully remains that way. Don't the rest of you get any ideas.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trollheart View Post
I'll have you know, my ancestors were Kings of Wicklow! We're as Irish as losing a three-nil lead in a must-win fixture!
GuitarBizarre is offline  
Old 04-18-2012, 09:30 AM   #106 (permalink)
Dat's Der Bunny!
 
MoonlitSunshine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,088
Default

Yes but, why do they need to be called sports. Noone that I have seen has tried to "delegitimise" them. They require great amounts of skill to play professionally, noone has denied that from what I have seen. Why are they a subcategory? A Sub category has to, by definition, contain ALL the aspects of the parent group. We've argued over and over that eSports don't require the same level of fitness as the set of "games" that most people will agree are "Sports". It would be more true to say that "Sports" under this same majority-definition, are a subcategory of Professionally-Played Games, which is why I am saying it would be better to give a term to define Professionally-played games, rather than applying yet another ambiguous and confusing definition to the already over-defined "Sport".
__________________
"I found it eventually, at the bottom of a locker in a disused laboratory, with a sign on the door saying "Beware of the Leopard". Ever thought of going into Advertising?"

- Arthur Dent
MoonlitSunshine is offline  
Old 04-18-2012, 09:55 AM   #107 (permalink)
D-D-D-D-D-DROP THE BASS!
 
GuitarBizarre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,730
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MoonlitSunshine View Post
Yes but, why do they need to be called sports. Noone that I have seen has tried to "delegitimise" them. They require great amounts of skill to play professionally, noone has denied that from what I have seen. Why are they a subcategory? A Sub category has to, by definition, contain ALL the aspects of the parent group. We've argued over and over that eSports don't require the same level of fitness as the set of "games" that most people will agree are "Sports". It would be more true to say that "Sports" under this same majority-definition, are a subcategory of Professionally-Played Games, which is why I am saying it would be better to give a term to define Professionally-played games, rather than applying yet another ambiguous and confusing definition to the already over-defined "Sport".
Are you reading the same thread I'm reading? The entire ****ing thread has been people trying to delegitimise the whole concept of eSports. It was started for EXACTLY THAT REASON.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pedestrian View Post
As for me, my inbox is as of yet testicle-free, and hopefully remains that way. Don't the rest of you get any ideas.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trollheart View Post
I'll have you know, my ancestors were Kings of Wicklow! We're as Irish as losing a three-nil lead in a must-win fixture!

Last edited by GuitarBizarre; 04-18-2012 at 10:28 AM.
GuitarBizarre is offline  
Old 04-18-2012, 09:59 AM   #108 (permalink)
killedmyraindog
 
TheBig3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Posts: 11,172
Default

If you're going to put a qualifier in front of what these people do for fun, why not in front of all things people do for fun.

The derivations would have to be broken down to the nth degree just so a bunch of vodka-swilling ego-maniacs can pretend their "accomplishments" are worth a damn. Track and boxing are wildly different. Tennis and baseball are wildly different.

Bowlings a sport and its the least physical thing I can imagine. I've worked up more of a sweat playing Starcraft than I have bowling.
TheBig3 is offline  
Old 04-18-2012, 12:05 PM   #109 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Thom Yorke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,848
Default

This is the thread that blows up on the sports board? I want Dirty back.
Thom Yorke is offline  
Old 04-18-2012, 12:37 PM   #110 (permalink)
killedmyraindog
 
TheBig3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Posts: 11,172
Default

Whats to argue about in hockey? Bruins are keeping the cup. And New England hired Ann Romney for Defensive Line so the Jets can suck on it this year too.
TheBig3 is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.