The English Football Thread - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > Community Center > Sport & Recreation
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-13-2007, 10:18 AM   #631 (permalink)
Atchin' Akai
 
right-track's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Unamerica
Posts: 8,723
Default

http://www.footymedia.com/videos/Soc...eestyle_Soccer

A must see. ^
right-track is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2007, 12:08 PM   #632 (permalink)
The Sexual Intellectual
 
Urban Hat€monger ?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,605
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by right-track View Post
Call my cynical but I was just dying for someone like Stuart Pearce to come along & take someone`s legs out.
__________________



Urb's RYM Stuff

Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave.
Urban Hat€monger ? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2007, 02:39 PM   #633 (permalink)
Slavic gay sauce
 
adidasss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Abu Dhabi
Posts: 7,993
Default

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-keC9GymLpI

What ever happened to fair play aye? I suppose dirty tricks are allowed as long as the English do it, but when the Portuguese do it it's an outrage?
__________________
“Think of what a paradise this world would be if men were kind and wise.” - Kurt Vonnegut, Cat's Cradle.

Last.fm
adidasss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2007, 02:41 PM   #634 (permalink)
Atchin' Akai
 
right-track's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Unamerica
Posts: 8,723
Default

What do you mean?
right-track is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2007, 02:42 PM   #635 (permalink)
Slavic gay sauce
 
adidasss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Abu Dhabi
Posts: 7,993
Default

I mean it was a dirty trick and the goal should not have been recognized if the judge had any sense. Not to mention that the French were totally robbed because there was no foul.
__________________
“Think of what a paradise this world would be if men were kind and wise.” - Kurt Vonnegut, Cat's Cradle.

Last.fm
adidasss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2007, 02:47 PM   #636 (permalink)
The Sexual Intellectual
 
Urban Hat€monger ?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,605
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by adidasss View Post
I mean it was a dirty trick and the goal should not have been recognized if the judge had any sense.
Why?

The rules of free kicks are pretty simple , the ref asks the player if he wants 10 yards , if he says no he can take the free kick straight away.
One of the things I was taught was if you concede a foul just outside the area you stand over the ball & block any quick free kicks being taken while your goalkeeper sets up a wall & wait for the referee to tell you to go back 10 yards.

You don`t have to wait for the ref to tell you to take a free kick in any other areas of the pitch.

If you give away a foul then the other team gets the advantage , plain & simple.
__________________



Urb's RYM Stuff

Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave.
Urban Hat€monger ? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2007, 02:48 PM   #637 (permalink)
Atchin' Akai
 
right-track's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Unamerica
Posts: 8,723
Default

Edit: You beat me to it Urb. ^ See Marijan...

*sighs heavily*

If by judge you mean referee, then he did the right thing.
Nowhere in the rules (which you should read by the way) says anything about having to wait for a whistle.
The only time a game is restarted by the whistle is for a retake (Starting the match/2nd half/a penalty/ after a goal is scored). A player can take the free kick at any time he chooses, unless he asks for the wall to be a full 10 yards away. The referee will then tell the kick taker to wait for the whistle while he makes sure the wall is a full 10 yards.

Giggs told the ref to go away and he got on with the game...GOAL.
Cue mardarse Frenchmen spitting out their dummies and throwing their toys around. They should, like you, read the rulebook.
right-track is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2007, 02:53 PM   #638 (permalink)
Inexplicably Back
 
_Spinning_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 830
Default

I saw this on the news last night.

Personally, I see nothing wrong with it.
Little girls getting all antsy because they conceded a goal.
Jesus.
_Spinning_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2007, 02:53 PM   #639 (permalink)
Slavic gay sauce
 
adidasss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Abu Dhabi
Posts: 7,993
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Urban Hatemonger View Post
Why?

The rules of free kicks are pretty simple , the ref asks the player if he wants 10 yards , if he says no he can take the free kick straight away.
One of the things I was taught was if you concede a foul just outside the area you stand over the ball & block any quick free kicks being taken while your goalkeeper sets up a wall & wait for the referee to tell you to go back 10 yards.

You don`t have to wait for the ref to tell you to take a free kick in any other areas of the pitch.

If you give away a foul then the other team gets the advantage , plain & simple.
Ever heard of fair play? It doesn't say the players have to throw the ball out if someone is injured, but they do it anyway because of fair play. That free kick was the equivalent of a surprise punch while the guy is not looking. It's disgraceful, but then again, football is far from being a gentleman's game now is it? Anything is allowed, surprise free kicks as well as faking a foul and getting the other team's player thrown out. What bothers me is the utter hypocrisy of it all. If those players had a shred of dignity they wouldn't have tried winning that way. It's not very honorable...Man. U. was clearly the better team and if not in this game, they would have proven it in the next one.
__________________
“Think of what a paradise this world would be if men were kind and wise.” - Kurt Vonnegut, Cat's Cradle.

Last.fm
adidasss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2007, 03:01 PM   #640 (permalink)
Atchin' Akai
 
right-track's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Unamerica
Posts: 8,723
Default

I suppose you think it's ungentlemanly to put a goalkeeper in the goals after conceding a penalty too?
The biggest sour face was the keeper, of all the players on the pitch he knew the score. He got caught napping and it embarrassed him.
Maybe next time he won't be foolish enough to stand at his post farting around with his wall, when the ball is active.
right-track is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.