 
| 
 | |||||||
| Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search | 
|  | 
|  | Thread Tools | Display Modes | 
|  | 
|  04-12-2010, 10:55 PM | #1 (permalink) | 
| "Hermione-Lite" Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: New York. 
					Posts: 3,084
				 |  New Capo 
			
			I don't have a capo. I need it to be cheap, I don't mind if it's an elastic one or anything. It's an acoustic. The fretboard is flat. It's a Jasmine Takamine. I was about to buy one just now on Amazon, but decided against it until I had some valid opinions. Does anyone have recommendations for good, cheap capos for an acoustic guitar? | 
|   |   | 
|  04-12-2010, 11:47 PM | #2 (permalink) | 
| nothing Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: everywhere 
					Posts: 4,315
				 |   
			
			they're generally all cheap.  kyser is the most common brand i've seen.  good quality but a little pricey ($20-$40), but they're all metal and solid pieces of hardware.  and they come in a variety of colours too.   | 
|   |   | 
|  04-13-2010, 12:04 AM | #3 (permalink) | |
| Unrepentant Ass-Mod Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Pennsylvania 
					Posts: 3,921
				 |   Quote: 
 Every capo I've seen, and I mean EVERY one has some sort of curvature to the barring arm, I would imagine a flat fretboard would hinder the capo's ability to barre the D/G strings and might lead to buzzing. It's also good to choose a capo that's spring-loaded rather than preloaded (like a set-screw) so that the capo naturally counteracts the spring tension and you don't need to worry about going out of tune as a result. But yes, I own the Kyser one that mr dave posted, works like a dream but it's relatively expensive (around $20). 
				__________________ first.am | |
|   |   | 
|  04-13-2010, 12:19 AM | #4 (permalink) | ||
| "Hermione-Lite" Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: New York. 
					Posts: 3,084
				 |   Quote: 
 It's just casual, you know? Casual recording, casual everything. There's nothing special I need it for. ^_^ Thanks for the recommendations. Quote: 
 Yeah, it's a flat fretboard according to what I see here. xD I didn't really think to get a screw capo, cause I feel like it'd be more difficult to deal with. It's either spring or elastic, I think. Thanks for the info and everything. [= | ||
|   |   | 
|  04-13-2010, 12:24 AM | #5 (permalink) | |
| nothing Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: everywhere 
					Posts: 4,315
				 |   Quote: 
  i've owned both kinds. the screw kind sucks. the leather backing fell off so i had to use a tissue or go bare metal on wood. no idea where that thing is now probably in a bunch of pieces. the kyser on the other hand is in the acoustic case. it'll last a lifetime and well worth the $20. mine's black   | |
|   |   | 
|  04-13-2010, 12:30 AM | #6 (permalink) | |
| Unrepentant Ass-Mod Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Pennsylvania 
					Posts: 3,921
				 |   Quote: 
 I believe (don't quote me on this) that the Takamine knock-offs almost all follow a similar body shape to my Ibanez AEG20E so your fretboard should be somewhat thinner than a Seagull or Yamaha. That being said any number of capos should work for you and I imagine you won't have any issues with them. A bit more about what I said about capos that use set screws -- they tend to be more temperamental because they're affected tremendously by thermal expansion. What I mean by that is that your fretboard and capo expand at different rates due to temperature gradients, which can actually result in accidentally INCREASING the load on your fretboard and risking the possibility of damaging it. Whereas a spring-loaded capo induces a (relatively speaking) constant force on the fretboard making it nearly impossible for it to send your guitar out of tune. Sorry if I wrote a lot there but this is one part of music technology that I actually understand and understand well.   
				__________________ first.am | |
|   |   | 
|  04-13-2010, 01:01 AM | #7 (permalink) | ||
| "Hermione-Lite" Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: New York. 
					Posts: 3,084
				 |   Quote: 
 Quote: 
 It's important that I find a capo specific to my needs, even if the needs are only casual. I understand what you mean about the different capos, and it won't be a problem since I wouldn't consider a capo with a screw anyway. That explanation draws me even further away from the decision, though, so it did help. | ||
|   |   | 
|  04-13-2010, 01:15 PM | #8 (permalink) | |
| D-D-D-D-D-DROP THE BASS! Join Date: Jan 2008 
					Posts: 1,730
				 |   
			
			Sugar -   The radius is exaggerated on that pic. Look from the bottom of the guitar up towards the headstock. You will be able to see a slight curve. Better yet, look at the bridge saddle. You'll be able to see that certain strings are higher than others. The only guitars with perfectly flat fingerboards are custom jobs and classical guitars 
				__________________ Quote: 
 | |
|   |   | 
|  04-13-2010, 02:46 PM | #9 (permalink) | |
| "Hermione-Lite" Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: New York. 
					Posts: 3,084
				 |   Quote: 
 Does this really change things as much? | |
|   |   | 
|  04-13-2010, 03:00 PM | #10 (permalink) | 
| Unrepentant Ass-Mod Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Pennsylvania 
					Posts: 3,921
				 |   
			
			Yep. Radial fretboards allow for easier barre chords among other ergonomic uses. Think action & force required to depress a string when your index finger doesn't actually fold flat. Classical guitars can get away with using flat fretboards because they use nylon strings, which are under tremendously lower tensile loads. Still harder to use barre chords though. 
				__________________ first.am | 
|   |   | 
|  | 
|  |